Jump to content

Olivia Rodrigo "GUTS" Reviews Thread | MC: 91


Cloröx

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 116
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Baby Judas

    5

  • drivers license

    4

  • Letemtalk

    4

  • georgechxng

    4

Her blood sucker must be fuming - good for this young talented SINGER and song writer! 

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
  • Haha 12
  • Thumbs Down 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

new reviews:

 

consequence (prob a 4/5): compared the album to melodrama so that gotta be positive https://consequence.net/2023/09/olivia-rodrigo-guts-review/3/

 

new york times (maybe a 5/5?): was picked as the critic's pick of the week for favorite release https://www.nytimes.com/2023/09/08/arts/music/olivia-rodrigo-guts-review.html

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

52 minutes ago, Kh-Loud said:

Her blood sucker must be fuming - good for this young talented SINGER and song writer! 

And you seem to be fuming over that supposed bloodsucker even more. :cooldown:
 

Anyway, making the bed, get him back and pretty isn’t pretty pulling the weight. :clap3:

Edited by Lemon
Link to comment
Share on other sites

it got a 3/5 from the telegraph, so the fuming can stop now :redface:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, drivers license said:

it got a 3/5 from the telegraph, so the fuming can stop now :redface:

Damn Olivia’s team forgot to send the check.  :dies: 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I listened. I get it now.

 

The review that gave her a 60 is just plain wrong. Too harsh. I could see 70 being a more reasonable low-end score.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

94 with 10 reviews (including the telegraph 3/5 one) is lowkey mind blowing :WAP: i could see it staying over 90. +85 is def a lock at this point tho. 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's always bought and paid for if an artist you don't like is getting good reviews but never when one you like gets them, it seems. Get your ears checked if you cannot hear how good this album is.

  • Like 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, Digitalism said:

Oh you're one of those artsy fartsy girls. Not everything has to be like ftbc to be good

Yeah, a once-in-a-decade lyrical masterpiece cannot be compared to some extremely basic teenage songs. I mean, Lindsey Lohan’s “Speak” has more depth than this album. 

Edited by playwithme
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 9/9/2023 at 12:31 AM, highwind44029 said:

The fumes from the OOH

 

njaz3xklx.thumb.gif.265596515ba7f8d959c1

It will probably be under 90 by the time it gets to 20-25 reviews, so they probably just needed to wait for a couple of days and they could have saved embarrassing themselves.

 

Also, if Interscope is paying for reviews, does that mean that all of the Interscope artists are getting paid reviews?

Or are all the rich pop stars paying?

 

One of the best pop albums I've listened to in recent months. Best overall this year is still Desire, I Want to Turn Into You.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

people complaining how this is getting 90+ ratings, oh the fuming :fountain:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Please don't drop below 90. :dancehall2:

 

P4K better come through with their 9.0 score. :WAP:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Jude said:

Please don't drop below 90. :dancehall2:

 

P4K better come through with their 9.0 score. :WAP:

In b4 6.8, you know their tryhard ass will pull some Were Diferent;)) ****

 

794Pif5.gif

 

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, Komet blu said:

In b4 6.8, you know their tryhard ass will pull some Were Diferent;)) ****

 

794Pif5.gif

 

Hopefully not. They already gave this album two BNTs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.