Jump to content

Johnny Depp vs. Amber Heard Trial


Coma Baby
Bloo
Message added by Bloo,

Mentioning @ATRL Feedback or @ATRL Administration does nothing. No staff member sees those notifications. If there is a member that is breaking ATRL rules, please report them and provide any additional context you think would better inform how we should judge it.

Recommended Posts

8 minutes ago, Sparrow's Bride said:

There’s a reason why that person who made the original thread used only 10 seconds long audios instead of the full context :coffee2:

 

 

Holy crap this delusion. The way she thought she ate, but she didn't manage to disupute a single claim. This is what happens when you stan a rapist wife beater:bibliahh:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 4.4k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • NausAllien

    329

  • suburbannature

    225

  • Patient Zero

    187

  • Mobility Mary

    147

2 hours ago, Mobility Mary said:

Holy crap this delusion. The way she thought she ate, but she didn't manage to disupute a single claim. This is what happens when you stan a rapist wife beater

That’s your response to a thread full of evidences, MM?

 

And @Pans Labyrinth, see how two can play your lame game?

 

Speaking of the husbandbeater, she's now flying commercial:

 

hj8o2wvtr0991.jpg

 

That's Economy/Coach class no less — continuing her theme of Tjmaxx and the grocery store......... by the way word on the street is that AH's sugardaddy is one Anthony Romero of ACLU. He is the one who is permanently living in the area where AH is allegedly temporarily shacked up: the Hamptons (seaside stumping ground of filthy rich New Yorkers who never fly commercial, never mind Economy).

Edited by Raiden
Link to comment
Share on other sites

50 minutes ago, Raiden said:

by the way word on the street is that AH's sugardaddy is one Anthony Romero of ACLU. He is the one who is permanently living in the area where AH is allegedly temporarily shacked up: the Hamptons (seaside stumping ground of filthy rich New Yorkers who never fly commercial, never mind Economy).

At this point it’s evident that you don’t even care about Depp because your obsession with Amber’s every move, even after the trial, is disturbing. She keeps living rent free in your mind as you constantly formulate random theories about her :ahh:

 

Now I know why you constantly  ignore every post calling you out here. You’re too busy checking your google alerts on Ambers next move.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Weld_E said:

At this point it’s evident that you don’t even care about Depp because your obsession with Amber’s every move, even after the trial, is disturbing. She keeps living rent free in your mind as you constantly formulate random theories about her :ahh:

 

Now I know why you constantly  ignore every post calling you out here. You’re too busy checking your google alerts on Ambers next move.

 

The way you scalped this delusional mess and they kept trying it. :bibliahh:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Raiden said:

That’s your response to a thread full of evidences, MM?

 

And @Pans Labyrinth, see how two can play your lame game?

 

Speaking of the husbandbeater, she's now flying commercial:

 

hj8o2wvtr0991.jpg

 

That's Economy/Coach class no less — continuing her theme of Tjmaxx and the grocery store......... by the way word on the street is that AH's sugardaddy is one Anthony Romero of ACLU. He is the one who is permanently living in the area where AH is allegedly temporarily shacked up: the Hamptons (seaside stumping ground of filthy rich New Yorkers who never fly commercial, never mind Economy).

and tell me quickly what does her flying economy class have to do with anything ?? this is literally unhealthy like next level hating :ahh:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, simon_xcx said:

and tell me quickly what does her flying economy class have to do with anything ?? this is literally unhealthy like next level hating :ahh:

Is low IQ a requirement to support AH? Flying economy has ofcourse everything to do with the case and its aftermath — it's part and parcel of her attempt to counteract the initial post-verdict accusations that she is a hypocrite when she sent Elaine out to TV stations to claim that AH can't afford to pay what the judge ordered her to pay, while at the same time she was shacked up in a lavish mansion and being escorted all over the country by an executive jet. 

 

So obviously she and her team changed tactics after that. It's why TMZ was tipped off to take snaps of her at TJMAXX. That's what the other encounter at the grocery store or fish market was all about. Likewise that's what this flying economy is all about. It's all part of the show to pretend as if she is not an actress with millions of dollars at her disposal, but a broke ass who can't afford to pay the court ordered fine — coz AH is AH: she just can't help herself but try to cheat her way out of everything.

Edited by Raiden
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Omg this is DERANGED wtf am I reading :ahh:

 

Anyway, her team filled the motion to dismiss the verdict .

One of the reasons is that one of the jurors who was born in the 70s lied that he was born in the 1945. Smells like a FRAUD.

 

Also Amber wasn't allowed to mention the outcome of the UK trial cause he agreed to only ask for damages in between the publication of OP-ED and the UK trial, but his team was allowed to constantly mention the alleged damages outside of that time frame. He lost the Fantastic Beast role cause he lost the UK trial, not cause of the OP-ED. He wasn't entitled to damages from before OP-ED cause you can't sue someone for defamation over the claims they made in a legal proceeding. 

Edited by Mobility Mary
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oops — more work for Elaine :laugh:

 

Apparently her client is a global criminal fugitive suspect who may have been up to her old tricks (lyin in order to cover up somethin) on the other side of the planet as well:

 

 

 

On 7/2/2022 at 11:41 AM, Mobility Mary said:

Anyway, her team filled the motion to dismiss the verdict .

One of the reasons is that one of the jurors who was born in the 70s lied that he was born in the 1945. Smells like a FRAUD.

 

Also Amber wasn't allowed to mention the outcome of the UK trial cause he agreed to only ask for damages in between the publication of OP-ED and the UK trial, but his team was allowed to constantly mention the alleged damages outside of that time frame. He lost the Fantastic Beast role cause he lost the UK trial, not cause of the OP-ED. He wasn't entitled to damages from before OP-ED cause you can't sue someone for defamation over the claims they made in a legal proceeding. 

Weak sauce.

 

Team AH's point is undermined by this line in the Washington Post OP-ED by the ACLU AH: “Then two years ago, I became a public figure representing domestic abuse". In other words she herself gave the game away and presented on a platter for JD's team the license to go as far back as she did (2 yrs ago = the divorce period) if they wanted to provide context for some of their arguments. So there is no timeline faux-pas which invalidates the entire court case.

 

As to one of the jurors date of birth discrepancy, well I don't see how a clerical error could influence a jury's verdict one way or the other. A bit Republican of AH's team to insinuate that a typo is somehow automatically sinister, and therefore should invalidate everything it touches. Leave that mindset to the GOP thugs who invalidate black and Latino votes because of spelling errors, tiny scratches on the ballot and so forth.

 

Long story short, the motion will be tossed out.

 

Edited by Raiden
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah I'm sure she's getting locked up for the dog incident when there's literally a tape of them discussing the fact that it was his fault and he tried to make her take the blame :ahh:

 

Also Depp's team literally agreed to sue her just for the damages during the time period from the publication of OP-ED and the UK trial so let's not sis.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 7/1/2022 at 11:50 PM, Raiden said:

That’s your response to a thread full of evidences, MM?

 

And @Pans Labyrinth, see how two can play your lame game?

 

Speaking of the husbandbeater, she's now flying commercial:

 

hj8o2wvtr0991.jpg

 

That's Economy/Coach class no less — continuing her theme of Tjmaxx and the grocery store......... by the way word on the street is that AH's sugardaddy is one Anthony Romero of ACLU. He is the one who is permanently living in the area where AH is allegedly temporarily shacked up: the Hamptons (seaside stumping ground of filthy rich New Yorkers who never fly commercial, never mind Economy).

She's still trying it huh? :rip:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Still such an iconic L for true lovers of lies and abuse. I rewatch the verdict daily to this day. We won!! 

 

tiffany-pollard-laughing-hysterically.gi

 

It's a terrible year for abuse  supporters in between this and R. Kelly. Love seeing abuse stans suffer. 

 

tiffany-pollard-laughing-hysterically.gi

 

Turd is going to have her day in criminal court one day, she can't help her abusive ways. It just pains me what it takes is yet another victim. I keep her daughter in my prayers. 

 

Evil Unstable Wood and Shia LaBastard next! They're gonna get beaten down HARSHLY. We love you, Manson and twigs. :heart:

 

tiffany-pollard-laughing-hysterically.gi

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Coma Baby said:

Still such an iconic L for true lovers of lies and abuse. I rewatch the verdict daily to this day. We won!! 

 

tiffany-pollard-laughing-hysterically.gi

 

It's a terrible year for abuse  supporters in between this and R. Kelly.

 

tiffany-pollard-laughing-hysterically.gi

 

Turd is going to have her day in criminal court one day, she can't help her abusive ways. It just pains me what it takes is yet another victim. I keep her daughter in my prayers. 

 

Evil Unstable Wood and Shia LaBastard next! They're gonna get beaten down HARSHLY. We love you, Manson and twigs. :heart:

 

saying “Love seeing abuse stans suffer.” and “love you manson” in the same post… this level of delusion is incredible 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, simon_xcx said:

 

ddd come on now 

and he WILL pay

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oh yes girls. Grab back! Time to toss out this fraudulent trial. The justice better be served!

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Lulz the only grabbing happening here is at straws by AH's defense team.

 

These desperate motions will be zapped by the court, because it will be regarded as an insult of them. And by the way AH's team forgot to act upon this extra knowledge they must have known about much earlier, during the trial. Yer not allowed to withhold information, only to deploy it after the verdict as some sort of reserve ammo, in order to overturn the verdict on a technicality. That kinda transparent shite don't fly in a court, certainly not this court. Clearly miz Elaine is true to her words: she's TRYING. :laugh:

 

Meanwhile AH's insurance company just announced that they believe not her but he was telling the truth — and that therefore they're done covering her ass (will not pay AH to pay JD):

 

 

Edited by Raiden
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Even Amber’s own insurance company not believing her lies. I wouldn’t be surprised if her own family and friends don’t have faith in her either.

 

tiffany-pollard-laughing-hysterically.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Got an actual source of those claims other than TMZ who has been in Johnny's pocket since day 1 and published 8 (maybe even more, can't remember the exact number) pro-Johnny articles in two weeks after their divorce? :ahh:

 

Anyway this was a MISTRIAL

Link to comment
Share on other sites

to the “it doesn’t matter” crowd :ahh:

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 7/9/2022 at 11:46 AM, Mobility Mary said:

Got an actual source of those claims other than TMZ

Yes I have an actual source

 

https://www.latimes.com/entertainment-arts/business/story/2022-07-08/amber-heard-faces-lawsuit-insurance-company-johnny-depp-case

 

Apparently what happened seems to be that AH had a deal with two separate insurance companies covering her various legal fees (including paying lawyer counsel). Then one of her insurance company sued her other insurance company, which in turn is now suing AH in order to prove that it doesn't owe that other insurance company sh*t. That seem to be the chain of events if I'm reading that LA Times article correctly.

 

BTW doesn't this mean Elaine was not honest when she made AH testify that AH couldn't fulfil her "pledge" because she paid 6 or 7 million in legal fees (which we now know is not true since it was an insurance company that was independently paying Elaine, Rotten & co, something Elaine could not have been unaware of since one can literally read on the cheque or whatever transfer document who is paying

 

 

Edited by Raiden
Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.