NausAllien Posted July 25 Posted July 25 6 minutes ago, Sannie said: You are a very gullible person lol. More proof you don't actually understand Americans and their political beliefs. What is your problem? Are you incapable of engaging with someone who has a different opinion without attacking them? Every single one of your responses is extremely hostile. There's something seriously wrong with you. 1
Sannie Posted July 25 Posted July 25 Just now, NausAllien said: What is your problem? Are you incapable of engaging with someone who has a different opinion without attacking them? Every single one of your responses is extremely hostile. There's something seriously wrong with you. Because you're a troll and you're not even American. We have lives to lose because of this election and it's just a joke for you. You always say this any time someone clocks you. Stop saying stupid **** and people will stop "attacking" you. You have no problem painting all Dems with a broad brush but then get mad when someone points out how stupid that is. That's a personal problem, imo. 4 8 1
NausAllien Posted July 25 Posted July 25 (edited) 2 minutes ago, Sannie said: We have lives to lose because of this election and it's just a joke for you. SEEK HELP! PS: Seriously, you are freaking scary. Edited July 25 by NausAllien 3 5
Sannie Posted July 25 Posted July 25 Serious question I would like someone else's opinion on. We know it's a fact Trump showed up on Epstein's flight log six or seven times. Why he was on Epstein's planes, we don't actually know, but he was on them nonetheless. Why does it seem like Biden, Harris, or really any Dem politician are afraid to touch this subject when it's something, if seen by a lot of people, could severely damage Trump? Am I missing something simple here?
Sannie Posted July 25 Posted July 25 1 minute ago, NausAllien said: SEEK HELP! PS: Seriously, you are freaking scary. Yeah, I'm the scary one and not the troll in another country cackling and laughing at the thought that there are vulnerable communities in the USA whose literal existence is at stake if Trump were to be elected again. 7 3
bunnyeyes Posted July 25 Posted July 25 (edited) 8 minutes ago, Vermillion said: Pretty much me after doing research but demote the billionaire Edited July 25 by bunnyeyes 1
ATRL Moderator Bloo Posted July 25 ATRL Moderator Posted July 25 26 minutes ago, NausAllien said: You sure about that? I remember Dems thinking "Texas" was in play, and it was nowhere near as close as they thought. In fact, Trump won in 56 of the 59 counties that rely on fracking, which offset the gains Dems made in larger cities. This... is why you're being called out. Democrats thinking "this is the year we take Texas" year after year is overly ambitious and delulu, yes. But, no one seriously thinks Texas is ever at play. If we did then we'd have less conversations about PA, MI, and WI because if TX was winnable then winning that alone would be enough to prevent a GOP win. Regarding the "county-by-county" breakdown in TX, Republicans will always win rural counties. That's not a metric that means anything. Dems always win because of cities. This is just a basic political scientific fact. Even the bluest states look like they're deep red if you look at the vote in some visuals if you look at a county-by-county level (one exception is Alaska which looks like a solidly blue state or, at least, a swing state but is very reliably red). 5 1
Sannie Posted July 25 Posted July 25 2 minutes ago, Vermillion said: slfjkdsfhldsfjkhdfsljdskfhdljsdkfh WHAT? Why is this the first time I'm seeing this?! 2
NausAllien Posted July 25 Posted July 25 4 minutes ago, Sannie said: whose literal existence is at stake The fact you even think this is what's truly scary SEEK HELP 4
Virgos Groove Posted July 25 Posted July 25 Sorry if this has been discussed already, but is there any reason Obama is taking longer to endorse Kamala? At first, I thought the Dem establishment didn't want it to look too much like a "coup", but then Pelosi endorsed her.
Sannie Posted July 25 Posted July 25 @Bloo When are we going to get a thread ban at this point? The GOP is threatening the existence of trans people, gay people, and immigrants and this person thinks it's a joke. This thread has multiple queer people and, surely, immigrants who browse it so being subjected to someone who thinks our existence is a joke, is bothersome. 1 minute ago, Virgos Groove said: Sorry if this has been discussed already, but is there any reason Obama is taking longer to endorse Kamala? At first, I thought the Dem establishment didn't want it to look too much like a "coup", but then Pelosi endorsed her. Sleepy Obama stuck in his basement. Doesn't know where he is! 3 1
WildAmerican Posted July 25 Posted July 25 ohhh that's nawt, i sure hope no opposing campaigns amplify this 3
Virgos Groove Posted July 25 Posted July 25 1 minute ago, WildAmerican said: ohhh that's nawt, i sure hope no opposing campaigns amplify this "Oh, so now the GOP's pick for Vice President can't write the foreword of a book written by the Project 2025 creator without that meaning he supports Project 2025??? Maybe he just liked the prose style. The woke left's gone mad!! " 1 4
Harrier Posted July 25 Posted July 25 The strong distaste for Buttigieg as a VP pick feels more like 2020 bitterness than anything substantive... like I get it he is a very cynical political actor. I have a negative view of him after 2020 too. But it probably isn't fair to put him in the same category of wacky Zionists like Shapiro or Fetterman, or somebody with a bad union record like Kelly Honestly he and Harris are cut from the same Obama cloth, ie say anything to get elected, policy is malleable, which unfortunately may work in his favour But the homosexuality is a liability it's not worth it
GraceRandolph Posted July 25 Posted July 25 4 minutes ago, Harrier said: The strong distaste for Buttigieg as a VP pick feels more like 2020 bitterness than anything substantive... like I get it he is a very cynical political actor. I have a negative view of him after 2020 too. But it probably isn't fair to put him in the same category of wacky Zionists like Shapiro or Fetterman, or somebody with a bad union record like Kelly Honestly he and Harris are cut from the same Obama cloth, ie say anything to get elected, policy is malleable, which unfortunately may work in his favour But the homosexuality is a liability it's not worth it Buttigieg adds nothing to a ticket. I really worry about a female/gay ticket turning off independent male voters. 1
RoseBud Posted July 25 Posted July 25 Until I know different Trump did not take a bullet for Democracy. He was merely winged by a bit of teleprompter....
Recommended Posts