terrijoe Posted January 14 Posted January 14 Britney fans grasping for straws like beyonce fans pretending she can emote like the grand divas of music. 7
Eternium Posted January 14 Posted January 14 On 1/12/2025 at 7:10 PM, Kimi said: I think the biggest tour in the history of humanity might check that box That doesn't make a performance famous. Music of the Spheres had no famous performance. Goodbye Yellow Brick Road had no famous performance. On 1/12/2025 at 7:48 PM, DevilsRollTheDice said: One of the most delusional posts and users I've ever encountered on this website, no point continuing You can literally view the trend data yourself that is linked. 2001 searches were 1.7% of 2024 total searches btw! Also Taylor's media peak was when she had the biggest music consumption year in history and the largest tour in history which was far more covered than her personal life press! Enjoy la la land, sis! You should have given up a long time ago. You cannot make a convincing argument on why Taylor Swift, who couldn't even make the top 10 for musicians for 2023, let alone top 10 for people, is a bigger search topic than the #1 person of, say, 2007. Britney dominated media in a way that hasn't been seen since and even created a massive paparazzi industry (worth $7-8M per magazine yearly) that had to be legislated out of existence because it was too massive. You're comparing metrics of their time - units have grown exponentially because all consumption is counted now and inflation has caused all tours to grow in size. Morgan Wallen has moved more units in the U.S. in the 2020s and grossed more on tour than Michael Jackson did at his peak. Guess who was bigger? You just have no concept of relativity and cannot fathom the fact that Taylor Swift is not #1 at something. It's weird ass behavior. 12 hours ago, swissman said: I think if we are going to compare the different eras we need to do that in both directions. If we are measuring the rate of coverage of person, it's not a good comparison to use someone whose "peak" was at the start of the internet-news era when blogs mainly ran things (and there were no smart phones with which people could access the news anywhere they went) to someone whose "peak" is today, an era where basically all news is primarily consumed online. A news site could publish 5 articles about Taylor in a day now if they want. It would be highly unlikely that they would publish 5 articles in print about the same person. Also, the "general interest" in Britney Spears pre-dates Google. So using stats from after that is disregarding the fact that prior, since her debut, she was largely the most famous woman in the world, so much so that her public breakdown is exactly what got her all those Google searches in 2006. You can diminish how much interest there was in her even if it was for something deeply personal and negative about her by saying it wasn't interest in her work, her career, or her as a person, but she could not have had such massive interest in her personal life if people were not so interested in her work, her career and her as a person. Drag her a bit 42 minutes ago, terrijoe said: Britney fans grasping for straws like beyonce fans pretending she can emote like the grand divas of music. It's funny because a quick look at your post history (Sonic outgrossing Mufasa, Wicked flopping, etc.) shows that you are literally wrong about everything. Another L for you, sis. 3
Terylee Posted January 14 Posted January 14 Britney was so big that they had to „create" the so called Anti-Britneys. 6
Robyn. Posted January 14 Posted January 14 She literally has one of the biggest career album sales with Adele & Taylor. How is she just vibes 9
Kimi Posted January 14 Posted January 14 8 hours ago, Eternium said: That doesn't make a performance famous. Music of the Spheres had no famous performance. Goodbye Yellow Brick Road had no famous performance. the whole concert is a famous performance, also neither mots or gybr had record breaking music film, like girl, come on.
Pedro Posted January 14 Posted January 14 (edited) Y'all taking a Billboard ranking seriously is literally insane. Britney Spears shaped all of your faves and you have the audacity of coming at her. Edited January 14 by Pedro 1 4
Onyxmage Posted January 14 Posted January 14 Her family almost killed her and she still managed to make the top 6 greatest artists of the 21st century. If thats not a legend I don't know what is.
VioletsandRoses Posted January 15 Posted January 15 (edited) Yeah for the most part. Her peak is overrated. In the 90s/00s many albums were selling in the 25-35m range and also had more/bigger hits. Her run only lasted until 2004. Her albums and hits after that have mediocre sales and certs/year ends. Out of her peers Beyoncé and Pink had the most longevity. Her career lasted slightly longer than jlo/xtina I guess. Edited January 15 by VioletsandRoses 2 3
Eternium Posted January 15 Posted January 15 12 hours ago, Kimi said: the whole concert is a famous performance, also neither mots or gybr had record breaking music film, like girl, come on. No, it isn't. Ask someone on the street to recreate the performances. A famous performance is almost always something televised that reaches the masses (Michael Jackson's Moonwalk at Motown, Beychella, Britney Spears the VMAs, Madonna at the VMAs, Gaga 2009 VMAs). Good for Taylor for having a hit tour, but it does not fit the criteria of what we were discussing. 6 hours ago, Pedro said: Y'all taking a Billboard ranking seriously is literally insane. Britney Spears shaped all of your faves and you have the audacity of coming at her. It's extra funny to see the Swifties coming after Britney stans like Taylor Swift isn't a fellow Army member 2 hours ago, VioletsandRoses said: Yeah for the most part. Her peak is overrated. In the 90s/00s many albums were selling in the 25-35m range and also had more/bigger hits. Her run only lasted until 2004. Her albums and hits after that have mediocre sales and certs/year ends. Out of her peers Beyoncé and Pink had the most longevity. Her career lasted slightly longer than jlo/xtina I guess. Britney's career outperformed Beyoncé's and P!nk's and she did it organically. It's funny that you want to downplay Britney's peak - Beyoncé's and P!nk's peaks were only half the size of Britney's second biggest era. Why are you trying to come for Britney for her peak of all things when it's the biggest female peak our generation has witnessed sans Adele? 1
Plastic Posted January 15 Posted January 15 6 minutes ago, Eternium said: Britney's career outperformed Beyoncé's and P!nk's and she did it organically. It's funny that you want to downplay Britney's peak - Beyoncé's and P!nk's peaks were only half the size of Britney's second biggest era. Why are you trying to come for Britney for her peak of all things when it's the biggest female peak our generation has witnessed sans Adele? Literally. 1
Kimi Posted January 15 Posted January 15 19 minutes ago, Eternium said: Ask someone on the street to recreate the performances. considering the tour made 2 billion dollars the film 260 million without streaming and god knows how many tiktok/youtube views were generated im guessing an average person could probably tell you a lot about it lol
hungrymuffin Posted January 15 Posted January 15 no she has the sales to back up, though they are quite frontloaded which is why people she is more of a vibes artist
#Beautiful Posted January 15 Posted January 15 On 1/8/2025 at 10:28 PM, A-V-XYZ said: She's only spent 6 weeks at #1 in total on the Hot 100 god how i hate newgen streaming brainrotted stans. youre a dumbass
Recommended Posts