official chart Billboard's Top 100 Artists Of The 21st Century - Taylor #1

[Fitzswiftie]

1 hour ago, Noodles said:

Swifties, since y'all are not well versed in seemingly any racial and cross-cultural conversations, I'll help y'all out by reminding ya'll that boiling down Beyoncé impact to "twitter vibes" is microaggression btw

Mind you Beyoncé isn't even the biggest "vibes" or "sneak" from the OG top ten. Britney #6 but behind Carrie Underwood at #34 on "real" list. 

[Fitzswiftie]

17 minutes ago, UnusualBoy said:

I don't disagree with Taylor #1 but Britney below the likes of some of these people is  

Well, it's about facts and data and numbers. Not vibes. 
 

As we are always told.

[Popboi.]

13 minutes ago, bijonse said:

There are more awards than AOTY specifically and Beyoncé has more of pretty much all of them thus Billboards music critics and editors getting together to name her the best artist of the new millennium.

 

As for metacritic Beyoncé post IASF beats taylor in that metric. Even the gift is higher than Taylor's latest album so yes numerically Beyoncé is more critically acclaimed unless acclaim is measured exclusively by AOTY awards. You know it's not but you will probably try to make that dumbass claim again 

 

The perfect analogy for their successes is Beyoncé being crowned the BEST and Taylor the most popular by billboard

 

so for the third time like I said

 

She is a bad singer dancer actor and performer but she WILL get her name written at the top of stats based lists! The swifties told me none of that **** mattered to them bc she is the best seller - corroborated by billboard so I don't get your fumes at me having a ki at her

 

 

 

 

"After Sasha", oh so to make your point you have to erase half of her discography

 

Billboard's Popstar list being the highly respected critics (when it's a charts publication first and foremost) you so speak of  

 

The loud echo chamber allegation not fading anytime soon by the same footnote 3 times in a row. 

[Ivan_brit]

The orther is a mess... but my faves are in

 

Also streaming era is messy

[Fitzswiftie]

2 hours ago, BlahBlahBlah said:

Fergie there with just the help of The Duchess proves it is that ***** 

  Reveal hidden contents

unless they are including BEP stats

 

Nope, everyone is solo, that's how you have four folks appearing twice as soloist and part of a band (Beyonce, Justin, Fergie & Harry),

[l3disko]

21 minutes ago, UnusualBoy said:

I don't disagree with Taylor #1 but Britney below the likes of some of these people is  

I'm guessing all of her poorly charting songs hindered her overall score.

 

She did surprisingly badly chart-wise in the early 2000s, didn't get her first 2000s #1 until 2008, did well for the next 3 years and has been spinning in her living-room ever since.

 

Edited 21 hours ago by l3disko

[bijonse]

9 minutes ago, Popboi. said:

"After Sasha", oh so to make your point you have to erase half of her discography

 

Billboard's Popstar list being the highly respected critics (when it's a charts publication first and foremost) you so speak of  

 

The loud echo chamber allegation not fading anytime soon by the same footnote 3 times in a row. 

No, before Sasha they're in the same league and then after she does better on metacritic, had the first pop girl album to get universal acclaim in the way we expect from them today and has way more awards. She is more critically acclaimed

 

And yes, billboard is the highly respected publication I'm talking about. Are their charts, data and lists not the main talking point of this forum? Of this very thread? But link us to another publication and their views on Beyoncé and taylor probably align. You already know that though, it's why the sales and streams are so important to you 

 

nothing you're saying is negating anything I said about taylor you're just attacking beyonce trying to say her music is bad when critics just don't agree  

 

which is why I keep repeating myself 

 

She is a bad singer dancer actor and performer but she WILL get her name written at the top of stats based lists!

 

 

[LesFleur]

3 hours ago, Fleahive said:

Mariah is very impressive. Ariana is lower than expected. 

Especially considering she's probably also high on the 20th century list.

 

[king_queen]

Destiny's Child, alone, stomping on entire careers

 

Hopefully this article will give the Stiff fans all the validation they've been feening for these past few weeks

[Feanor]

The fumes in this thread.

 

It's a cute list, but wbk this already. What Billboard needs to do is update their all-time list.

[jdanton2]

Bruno #9 with only 4 albums.

[Ahiru77]

Linkin Park 

[Green]

It's weird to see Britney lower than Carrie Underwood but it's based on chart data so it's 100% objective

[Yes, AND]

1 hour ago, edutada said:

WAIT what happened? STOP THE COUNT!

Did they put RAIN ON ME or DWAS for my beloved Gaga???

SHE CAN'T BE BELLOW KATY PERRY

Apparently Womans world's one week at 63 edged Katy ahead. 

[The Music Industry]

Interesting how the list changes when it's based on facts instead of the opinions of a few 

[MattieB]

Mediocrity right on top. The music industry is dead, gone are the days of MJ, Prince, Aretha, Janet, James Bown, Etta, Mariah, Celine, Whitney, Jamiroquai Luren Hill etcetc

 

Now we have a nursery rhyme lyricist on top—Trump's world.

 

[KingBeyonce.]

Some of the switfies comments in here and on twitter are frying me. They've been fuming about a list since November lmfao. Mad enough to still bring it up here instead of being happy for their favorite artist. Mind you, the list that they're mad about was supposed to include subjective factors. That's like being mad at a critic's year end list because of a mid selling album being above a top seller. But what can I expect from stans of someone that is not widely praised for singing, dancing, or performing - and singing is the main thing that singers are expected to be good at. When you don't have that, stats are gonna be the main thing that validates you and that you feel compelled to defend even if it means being completely irrational and for some - just absolutely bigoted  

--

Ashanti being on here shows how much she dominated with those first couple of albums lol

[Yes, AND]

Seeing Katy in the top 5 females is a definite win for the Kats. 143 did that ! 

[Jolin Tsai]

oh katy

[Shinning]

1 hour ago, The Music Industry said:

Interesting how the list changes when it's based on facts instead of the opinions of a few 

Beyoncé being Greater than Taylor Swift is a fact.

 

[Badgalbriel]

5 minutes ago, Shinning said:

Beyoncé being Greater than Taylor Swift is a fact.

 

And like there's just no discussion there. I don't even know why people got mad about that. Beyoncé is just the greatest. And it's just that simple. 

 

[NEX]

4 hours ago, Calvin said:

Ik. She literally scammed her fans by selling half-baked albums. 

Swifties really shouldn't be talking about half baked albums when the entire re-recording saga is a scam with "production is my passion" quality audios. 

[FENTY.]

Why is anyone shocked that Billboard made a list based on Billboard charts?

[CocoPouf]

8 hours ago, KatyPrismSpirit said:

Katheryn having only 3 successful eras but still washing most other pop girls that have 6/7/8 albums under their belt is sending me. Guess its never really over indeed 

What is the logic behind comparing Katy with her successful eras to the total number of records of other people? Math is not mathing, Katy has 7 albums, the same as the other pop girls you want to compare her

[Zendayababes]

9 hours ago, a_d_22 said:

Interesting what happens when things are factual and not based on Twitter vibes

The numbers are factual but the methodology certainly isn't. How did they weigh points? Cuz there's no way in hell Usher would be lower than Post Malone or that jailbird Hillbilly.