Jump to content

Kamala Harris can't say that transgender people should receive gender-affirming care


Recommended Posts

Posted
2 minutes ago, PrettyHurts said:

Awful response. Can't even say her own belief :hoetenks:

shes a puppet. i don't get how people trust her 

  • Like 2
  • Thumbs Down 1

  • Replies 284
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • on the line

    20

  • Bloo

    11

  • Sawk

    11

  • Vermouth

    11

Posted
2 minutes ago, ChooseyLover said:

Well, what are your actual thoughts? What do you think of the OP? Anything of value to add sis?

Kamala might be a spineless useless ***** but Jill Stein is literally a Russian asset.  sis!

  • Like 7
  • Thumbs Down 6
Posted

I don't hear anything wrong here...

  • Like 1
  • Thumbs Down 5
Posted

She is such a joke. :rip:

Posted

Ugh I feared this would happen with her pivot to the right.

 

She's so annoying and stands for nothing. 

Posted (edited)

And It's perfectly fine if she believes they shouldn't or if it's not a priority, people will decide, she knows she is losing the polls.

Edited by tshwark
Posted
1 minute ago, Prodigal Self said:

Kamala might be a spineless useless ***** but Jill Stein is literally a Russian asset.  sis!

That sounds like a conspiracy theory to me. US politics are just nastier than the average and I'm hesitant to believe whatever is put out in these smear campaigns. But I'd like to be proven wrong if that's really the case :cm:

Posted

I feel her answer is just a reflective on what she's gathered from many doctors along her journey. She knows the Doctor's are for gender affirming care, and that's why she's answered it that way. I think though, Kamala's high hopes in the voters being fully well-informed/knowledgeable of the subject is why people are against her. Because unlike Donald, she can't connect "as well" with people who may not be as well versed in the subject. 
 

It's very obvious imo that Kamala is for gender affirming care, but she is NOT trans and is NOT LGBTQ, so her giving a black and white answer on a subject she has no personal experience with in her own life is difficult. But at least it's obvious she's open to gender affirming care. Donald is NOT.

 

And what sets Gen-Z back (imo) is the epidemic of hyper awareness that obviously benefits to an extent, but also has us making assumptions that could possibly end up biting us in the a**. Regardless, even with this interview, by no means does it mean you guys should not vote or vote for F*CKING Donald Trump. And if you do, it makes you no better than Kamala imo.

  • Thanks 5
  • Thumbs Down 5
Posted

Kamala please don't do this to yourself days before election.

 

At first I was excited by the renewed energy around the Democratic party when Kamala stepped in, but throughout the campaign she has proven that her tactic is primarily to get support from capitalist institutions which reflects an advert to her forward-looking fidelity to the interests of capital. I thought we would have so much hope around the issues such as trans healthcare but she is just coming across as spineless. Not necessarily disappointing but disheartening I guess

Posted
4 minutes ago, cuteboyzay said:

I feel her answer is just a reflective on what she's gathered from many doctors along her journey. She knows the Doctor's are for gender affirming care, and that's why she's answered it that way. I think though, Kamala's high hopes in the voters being fully well-informed/knowledgeable of the subject is why people are against her. Because unlike Donald, she can't connect "as well" with people who may not be as well versed in the subject. 

I do however agree with your point because it is much easier to sway people on your side (the way Trump does) when your rhetoric is to appear knowledgable about the topic you know nothing about, in service of his harmful ideology.

 

By not speaking up directly (even if out of good intentions?) Kamala does not have that sway (but then, what are her intentions?)

  • Like 1
Posted
24 minutes ago, Sawk said:

This is kinda… making me think Donald actually has a chance again… In August I was so confident he was a sure loser, but now I'm getting kinda scared, she's giving p*ssy answers instead of talking about her own stance on things. :rip:

The sad reality is that even if she talked about her own stance on things, she would still lose. Trump is winning because a lot of people actually support him. 

  • Thanks 1
Posted
38 minutes ago, Blue. said:

As a non American, can someone explain what they are discussing here? Sound like she's being asked on gender affirming therapy and she is saying that medical advise should be followed, so without context I don't know exactly what's wrong.

Trump is running on anti-trans stances and claiming Harris supports transgender person as a bad thing. So its silly that she dodges the question because it affirms the right's framing of it. 

  • Thanks 10
Posted
43 minutes ago, Communion said:

This is electoral brain rot where she's invented a voter that doesn't exist because no actual person believes it is fine for doctors to prescribe gender-affirming care but then would get mad if a politician said they support doctors doing so because it's the agreed upon science. You can say trans affirming healthcare is scientifically backed!

!!!!! Like, who is she trying to pander to exactly with these statements? People who are against gender-affirming care will continue to be, and likely are not voting for her in the first place, it's insane how they have invented this "moderate" voter pool that will win the election for her as opposed to actually speaking towards what Democratic voters actually want :deadbanana2:

  • Like 7
  • Thanks 7
  • Confused 1
Posted

i really don't understand the difference between republican and democrat politicians

 

and their supporters are brain dead too, americans treat politics like it's a sport, they vote for their party rather than politicians with policies they agree with, and that's how you end up with people like kamala, biden, fetterman etc

  • Like 10
  • Thanks 5
  • Thumbs Down 1
Posted
3 minutes ago, no_better said:

I do however agree with your point because it is much easier to sway people on your side (the way Trump does) when your rhetoric is to appear knowledgable about the topic you know nothing about, in service of his harmful ideology.

 

By not speaking up directly (even if out of good intentions?) Kamala does not have that sway (but then, what are her intentions?)

Thank you so much for seeing where I'm coming from it really means a lot. :cries:
 

I feel Kamala's intentions are for what the general consensus wants and what they've BEEN wanting. And that includes gender-affirming care. Her statements and her constant emphasis throughout this campaign of being there for the general public/minorities and not for the "tax-cuts for CEO's of North America", in my opinion is just proof of what she wants. But givin this is literally her first time running for President as a black/asian woman, it's gonna be wanky. 
 

But Chile, this is 100x better than what HILLARY was serving lmao! I just fear that the disassociation of Gen-Z and our hyper-awareness is what's gonna stab us in the back of what is truly the better decision at the end of the day. I feel we fail to see the potential in our candidates if they're not promising/delivering everything to us right at that moment.

  • Thanks 1
  • Confused 1
Posted

Ah another circle jerk of a thread for ATRLs finest Trump supporters.

  • Like 5
  • Thanks 3
  • Thumbs Down 10
Posted
4 minutes ago, Headlock said:

!!!!! Like, who is she trying to pander to exactly with these statements? People who are against gender-affirming care will continue to be, and likely are not voting for her in the first place, it's insane how they have invented this "moderate" voter pool that will win the election for her as opposed to actually speaking towards what Democratic voters actually want :deadbanana2:

I truthfully don't think she's pandering but she has a disconnect with some of her voters. She's speaking through that disconnect given she's not only a woman but a black/asian woman running against a literal YT man who has already been PRESIDENT BEFORE. Like she's not just running against some regular ole candidate girl. I'm surprised y'all aren't allowing yourselves to see where the issue is lmaooo!!! :deadbanana2:

Posted

Honestly, it's so depressing that even the Democratic presidential nominee can't openly say "Trans healthcare is healthcare" nowadays :skull:

  • Thanks 2
Posted
3 minutes ago, on the line said:

Ah another circle jerk of a thread for ATRLs finest Trump supporters.

Thank you.

 

Because I'm honestly getting weirded tf out by these responses if they think Trump is the "better" candidate. The man is even worse, but he's a puppet to the entire right side. At least Kamala has the f*cking credentials. This man is a rap*st/abuser. Like why does it sound like they still wanna vote for him? :deadbanana2:

  • Like 8
  • Thumbs Down 4
Posted
8 minutes ago, on the line said:

Ah another circle jerk of a thread for ATRLs finest Trump supporters.

Firdt bashing homeless people and now trans people? There really isn't a marginalized demographic you don't hate. :redface:

Posted
Just now, cuteboyzay said:

Thank you.

 

Because I'm honestly getting weirded tf out by these responses if they think Trump is the "better" candidate. The man is even worse, but he's a puppet to the entire right side. At least Kamala has the f*cking credentials. This man is a rap*st/abuser. Like why does it sound like they still wanna vote for him? :deadbanana2:

I literally slipped enterting this thread on the rabid foam and excitement from these posters trashing Harris to help a literal rapist get elected. ******* bizarre. 

  • Thanks 7
  • Thumbs Down 6
Posted

so no "***** to the feminine what" tonight huh ? 

  • Haha 1
Posted
7 minutes ago, cuteboyzay said:

I truthfully don't think she's pandering but she has a disconnect with some of her voters. She's speaking through that disconnect given she's not only a woman but a black/asian woman running against a literal YT man who has already been PRESIDENT BEFORE. Like she's not just running against some regular ole candidate girl. I'm surprised y'all aren't allowing yourselves to see where the issue is lmaooo!!! :deadbanana2:

Okay, but again, whose votes is she trying to get? Trump has already himself to be vehemently anti-trans in all aspects, why is Kamala also catering towards anti-trans rhetoric? People who hate trans people are going to vote for Trump, she's not winning over anybody when talking like this, and is in fact doing the opposite and turning off voters who ARE in the Democratic base already.

Posted
3 minutes ago, cuteboyzay said:

if they think Trump is the "better" candidat

> *posts complaining about the failures of Harris' poor political acumen that she could lose to someone as awful as Trump*

 

> "OH WOW SO YALL THINK TRUMP IS BETTER???"

 

Can yall share those DNC checks? And if you're not getting paid, can I advise having some dignity to at least get paid? At least get a meal out of it?

  • Like 4
  • Thanks 1
Posted
29 minutes ago, ChooseyLover said:

That sounds like a conspiracy theory to me. US politics are just nastier than the average and I'm hesitant to believe whatever is put out in these smear campaigns. But I'd like to be proven wrong if that's really the case :cm:

There's a reason why she comes out of the woodwork every 4 years

ezgif-2-d2573a905c.thumb.gif.e7ce7ff19e9

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.