Jump to content

Bigger eras: 1989/Midnights vs. The Fame Monster/Born This Way


Well?  

162 members have voted

  1. 1. ..

    • 1989 & Midnights
    • The Fame Monster & Born This Way


Recommended Posts

Posted
2 minutes ago, JO1s said:

Youtube was very small. There was still a general pop culture that people payed attention to during Gaga’s peak. That has shifted majorly and most people live in their own pop culture bubbles.

LIES. Youtube was at it's peak in 2012. That's why you have so many MVs with billions views from that time.  The way you just keep talking s*** :toofunny3:

  • Like 2

  • Replies 65
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Windy Day

    6

  • WildHeart

    5

  • bjorn

    4

  • byzantium

    4

Posted
Just now, Raptus said:

LIES. Youtube was at it's peak in 2012. That's why you have so many MVs with billions views from that time.  The way you just keep talking s*** :toofunny3:

The fame/fame monster was in 2008-Early 2010. YouTube peaked in 2016 actually too. So you’re just being loud and wrong right now.

Posted

I voted for Taylor, who won the Album of the Year Grammy for both albums. :clap3:
 

Congrats to Lady Gaga for winning the People’s Choice Award for the Born This Way album. :heart:

Posted

two of those albums are still talked about today 

Posted
16 hours ago, Kayseri Mantisi said:

I would say the one that's still relevant in 2024 despite debuting earlier

kayseriiiii.thumb.gif.c26faf7f32b399bed3

  • Haha 1
Posted

taylor for both

Posted

Fame Monster, no contest.  To all the girls that were alive during that time, know that Gaga was inescapable the moment Bad Romance got released. 

  • Like 2
Posted

this thread reminded me of the way gaga used her peak and immense platform at that time to directly attack the president and the government to abolish that homophobic law and fought for marriage equality phew… love seeing pop stars use their platform for good and not caring about losing a certain demographic!!

  • Like 4
BrandNewBrandon
Posted (edited)
15 hours ago, JO1s said:

Gaga’s peak felt bigger because most people were watching the same shows listening to the same music and consuming very similar media back in the late 00s early 10s.

Taylor doing all she’s doing while the gp isn’t focused on one thing is crazy so I’d say she’s bigger.

Nah. Music Television was dead and YouTube was the new go-to platform for content when Gaga arrived. Add to that, Facebook, Myspace, Twitter and LimeWire as the main source of entertainment for young people. And Gaga still managed to become the biggest name in all of entertainment. 

 

17 hours ago, bjorn said:

Current Taylor is bigger than the fame gaga. Reason why gagas felt bigger was because it was her debut, and she’d declined ever since. Taylor is the opposite trajectory 

 

kisses 

Not true. Gaga sold 15 million albums and 100 million singles when the vast majority of Latin America, Asia and Eastern Europe were downloading and flooded with piracy. The official numbers from the IFPI are at 95% of consumed music when Gaga was peaking as illegal so obviously she would have even bigger numbers if everything was legal like it is today.

 

If a casual music listener wanted to listen to Gaga's music he could do it via YouTube or Myspace and none of it counted towards her sales. It only counted if he decided to buy the album or songs on iTunes or in stores. Fast forward to today and a casual music listener checking out Taylor's latest single is directly adding units to her overall sales whether it be via YouTube or Spotify. Taylor literally has legal music consumption from every part of the world, practically 100% of the market. 

 

Gaga's music sales consisted of Europe, the US, Canada, Australia and Japan. It was lacking the legal consumption from most of Latin America, Asia, Africa, the Middle East and Eastern Europe. There's not a person in Africa that checks out Taylor's music that isn't also adding sales to her total. Gaga didn't have that.

 

Gaga's imperial phase was bigger. Born This Way (the song) was #1 for five weeks from pure sales and radio and no views from the video were counted towards its chart points. That's impressive. Even more impressive is that when the GP and her fans were mass-listening to her music during her imperial phase (when everyone and their mother were checking her music out) NONE of it was counted towards her album units. No matter who listens to Taylor today is added towards her sales. 

Edited by BrandNewBrandon
  • Like 4
Posted
21 hours ago, bjorn said:

Current Taylor is bigger than the fame gaga. Reason why gagas felt bigger was because it was her debut, and she’d declined ever since. Taylor is the opposite trajectory 

 

kisses 

but the post is about tfm/btw eras... what does the fame have to do w it? ofc taylor now is bigger than gaga's debut... the question is whether she's bigger than gaga in her follow up eras which launched her to international superstardom (although tbh i would argue that these specific albums have nothing to do w taylor's current 'imperial' era - it's all the tour and the tv releases as a whole combined w ongoing new releases)

Posted
On 3/10/2024 at 10:12 AM, OreGuy said:

Albums: EAS: Gaga: 54M, Taylor: 49M. 

Daily 

Taylor - 34.6k (12M yearly) 

Gaga - 8.6k (3M yearly) 

IMG_4684.gif?ex=66004f78&is=65edda78&hm=

 

22 hours ago, TouchinFree said:

and not exclusive to white women. 

Neither is Taylor. She just had the biggest female tour ever on Asia and LATAM. 

Posted
6 hours ago, Windy Day said:

love seeing pop stars use their platform for good and not caring about losing a certain demographic!!

We do indeed. I wonder what has changed for Gaga to make her silent lately 

IMG_4684.gif?ex=66004f78&is=65edda78&hm=

  • Haha 3
Posted

TF/M > 1989 > Midnights > BTW

Posted
7 hours ago, BrandNewBrandon said:

Nah. Music Television was dead and YouTube was the new go-to platform for content when Gaga arrived. Add to that, Facebook, Myspace, Twitter and LimeWire as the main source of entertainment for young people. And Gaga still managed to become the biggest name in all of entertainment. 

 

Not true. Gaga sold 15 million albums and 100 million singles when the vast majority of Latin America, Asia and Eastern Europe were downloading and flooded with piracy. The official numbers from the IFPI are at 95% of consumed music when Gaga was peaking as illegal so obviously she would have even bigger numbers if everything was legal like it is today.

 

If a casual music listener wanted to listen to Gaga's music he could do it via YouTube or Myspace and none of it counted towards her sales. It only counted if he decided to buy the album or songs on iTunes or in stores. Fast forward to today and a casual music listener checking out Taylor's latest single is directly adding units to her overall sales whether it be via YouTube or Spotify. Taylor literally has legal music consumption from every part of the world, practically 100% of the market. 

 

Gaga's music sales consisted of Europe, the US, Canada, Australia and Japan. It was lacking the legal consumption from most of Latin America, Asia, Africa, the Middle East and Eastern Europe. There's not a person in Africa that checks out Taylor's music that isn't also adding sales to her total. Gaga didn't have that.

 

Gaga's imperial phase was bigger. Born This Way (the song) was #1 for five weeks from pure sales and radio and no views from the video were counted towards its chart points. That's impressive. Even more impressive is that when the GP and her fans were mass-listening to her music during her imperial phase (when everyone and their mother were checking her music out) NONE of it was counted towards her album units. No matter who listens to Taylor today is added towards her sales. 


2008 was different times and climate. I’m not saying Gaga wasn’t HUGE during her debut, I’m just saying that’s when she peaked. Current Taylor, in my opinion has overtaken her in popularity because of the Eras tour and her re-releases. This is Taylor’s peak 18 years into her career, which is what’s most impressive. 

Posted
10 hours ago, Phaunzie said:

Fame Monster, no contest.  To all the girls that were alive during that time, know that Gaga was inescapable the moment Bad Romance got released. 

And Taylor hasn’t been inescapable for a good 2 years now? :bibliahh:

Posted
2 hours ago, WildHeart said:

We do indeed. I wonder what has changed for Gaga to make her silent lately 

IMG_4684.gif?ex=66004f78&is=65edda78&hm=

no no you’re right. the way she was openly against the government and the system for the good of others not so privileged while at her absolute peak and putting her entire career in danger makes it even more disappointing to me

Posted

Gaga in the Europe.  Taylor globally.  

Posted
1 hour ago, bjorn said:

And Taylor hasn’t been inescapable for a good 2 years now? :bibliahh:

spacer.png

 

according to google, gaga’s peak was higher than taylor’s current peak!

Posted
4 minutes ago, Windy Day said:

spacer.png

 

according to google, gaga’s peak was higher than taylor’s current peak!

Well if we are being accurate, we have to account for the fact that people engage with google (and YouTube) differently (a lot less) in 2024 than they did in 2010.  Like if we are going to contextualize differences in the touring market, we might as well do that for Google trends as well. 

Posted
42 minutes ago, Windy Day said:

spacer.png

 

according to google, gaga’s peak was higher than taylor’s current peak!

So Michael Jackson’s peak was higher than Gaga then in 2009 according to google searches? Just because something was searched for most doesn’t mean it equates to success and popularity. 

Posted
1 hour ago, byzantium said:

Well if we are being accurate, we have to account for the fact that people engage with google (and YouTube) differently (a lot less) in 2024 than they did in 2010.  Like if we are going to contextualize differences in the touring market, we might as well do that for Google trends as well. 

ppl still mainly use google for internet searches tho let’s not

 

33 minutes ago, bjorn said:

So Michael Jackson’s peak was higher than Gaga then in 2009 according to google searches? Just because something was searched for most doesn’t mean it equates to success and popularity. 

yes he was?? his death was a defining event that shook the world and the internet itself and caused spike in internet traffic. i wasn’t even a fan and i was young when he died but i remember where i was and i remember the day he died. it was that massive

Posted
44 minutes ago, bjorn said:

So Michael Jackson’s peak was higher than Gaga then in 2009 according to google searches? 

It literally was. Probably the biggest cultural event this century, everyone lived through it would admit it.

 

OT: Taylor has bigger numbers but Gaga was the bigger phenomenon. She was the most followed person on Twitter and Youtube, the most liked on Facebook and the most downloaded artist in the world. She was IT.

  • Like 1
Posted

Taylor obviously. TFM was massive but it's far from the equivalent to Taylor's peak at the moment. Born This Way was a non-event compared to 1989 and Midnights.

Posted

Is the ears tour part of midnights? Or is it it’s own era? 

Posted
49 minutes ago, Windy Day said:

ppl still mainly use google for internet searches tho let’s not

To ignore the overall decline in google trend traffic though would

be willfully obtuse. 

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.