Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
Just now, Anticipating said:

This could literally apply to every single artist...? May I remind you that this is the chart section and if you don't care about commercial performance, then idk what you're doing here. You're wasting your time hun. :heart2:

selena's flop is not the same thing / same drag of people that are only singers.

but if you don't get it that's okay, keep posting here. 

 

3 minutes ago, tomo said:

Day 3: +1,136,986 (-275,542)

more than calm down's 3rd day 977k (it started going viral on it's 5th day) omg 'love on' the smash hit that u are. nnn 

 

5 minutes ago, Rotunda said:

No amount of money in the bank will make the song not suck, but if you want to stan on the basis of who has more money then I’m sure you can try to create a stan forum on Forbes or something.

it's not exactly about money. it's about being without a doubt a successful person. 

so seeing people making fun of a person that is, still, without a doubt VERY successful feels kinda pathetic 

it's different than someone that "was" successful, she built herself an empire where she's allowed to flop and keep herself relevant (not only rich)

people can say what they want about the song tho 

 

11 minutes ago, Kimi said:

its just that „dragging” commercial performance is so lame and gives 13 yo stan twitter user vibes. and there’s no spin you can do that will make it less cringe, cause at the end, who cares, especially if we’re talking about someone closer to billionaire than to millionaire who doesn’t have to sell a single song ever again. she can release 100 songs that will have similar chart run and it won’t affect her wealth and cultural relevance. when will yall learn that those drags always make you look like a weirdo :heart2:

:clap3:

 

  • Confused 1
  • Thumbs Down 3

  • Replies 202
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • sourprint

    9

  • Anticipating

    8

  • Blue Monday

    8

  • Rotunda

    7

Posted
6 minutes ago, Kimi said:

the fact that in your mind you can either stan or drag says much 

Was this supposed to be comprehensible?

Posted
2 minutes ago, Selegend said:

it's not exactly about money. it's about being without a doubt a successful person. 

so seeing people making fun of a person that is, still, without a doubt VERY successful feels kinda pathetic 

it's different than someone that "was" successful, she built herself an empire where she's allowed to flop and keep herself relevant (not only rich)

people can say what they want about the song tho 

Sure, she’s successful. Successful people can still produce bad art. We can certainly comment on how that art is being received by the general public even if she is too rich to have to care about making quality art (which I think is a weird thing to say in defense of your fav on a forum that is largely fixated on discussing art and its quality.)

 

Successful people can also be bad people and if we take your argument to its logical conclusion, any mocking of them is “pathetic” regardless of how warranted it may be. And that’s, to me, a ridiculous standard to set.

  • Like 1
Posted
3 minutes ago, Rotunda said:

Sure, she’s successful. Successful people can still produce bad art. We can certainly comment on how that art is being received by the general public even if she is too rich to have to care about making quality art (which I think is a weird thing to say in defense of your fav on a forum that is largely fixated on discussing art and its quality.)

 

Successful people can also be bad people and if we take your argument to its logical conclusion, any mocking of them is “pathetic” regardless of how warranted it may be. And that’s, to me, a ridiculous standard to set.

well it's not like she's released albums or EPs or entered a musical era. 

she's released 2 singles. that's it. one was a demo from 2017 and the other one yep, a new pop single. 

it's not like she doesn't care cuz she's successful, she doesn't care cuz it's not that deep for her in 2024.

she can just have fun with it and it's visible that she's only having fun with it. 

maybe it will be deep in the future again cuz she'll have more things to talk about and then she'll release an artistic body of work, who knows 

 

anyway, that's it. great that u know she's successful and if u truly believe she's a bad person i recommend u to take off your stan twitter 'not worried about real problematic people' glasses. 

bye :heart2::heart2:

 

 

 

  • Haha 2
  • Thumbs Down 1
Posted
1 minute ago, Selegend said:

anyway, that's it. great that u know she's successful and if u truly believe she's a bad person i recommend u to take off your stan twitter 'not worried about real problematic people' glasses. 

bye :heart2::heart2:

 

You’re responding to arguments that were never made. I implore you to learn how to read at some point in your life. 

  • Thanks 2
  • Haha 6
Posted

OUT AHHHHHHHH! :bibliahh:

  • Thumbs Down 1
Posted

THE EXCUSES :ahh: SHE’S RICH!!!1!1!1!1!

  • Haha 9
Posted

This song was released by Interscope Records, not some independent label that Selena started. So of course the success of the song matters. The delusional gays making excuses “but she’s rich” aren’t making sense. :snowball:

  • Like 2
Posted

the selena stans scrambling :bibliahh:

Selena Gomez's activism for the Princess Protection Program. :  r/popheadscirclejerk

  • Haha 12
sourprint
Posted
9 minutes ago, YR. said:

THE EXCUSES :ahh: SHE’S RICH!!!1!1!1!1!

yeah because surely as hell selena has built off this amazing empire with rare beauty just from coming from dust. yall r so blind thats why theyre taking away your rights

giggle-laugh.gif

  • Confused 1
  • Thumbs Down 2
sourprint
Posted
3 minutes ago, Karla Cabello said:

the selena stans scrambling :bibliahh:

Selena Gomez's activism for the Princess Protection Program. :  r/popheadscirclejerk

selena doesnt give a **** about you has-been atrl gays, i dont even LIKE her but its funny to say the least to think that hurts her feelings

 

she remains in power

 

  • Haha 2
  • Thumbs Down 1
Posted
3 minutes ago, sourprint said:

selena doesnt give a **** about you has-been atrl gays, i dont even LIKE her but its funny to say the least to think that hurts her feelings

 

she remains in power

 

She's crying on social media every two business days. I think this affects her more than you think it does.

tvhza82bvt361.jpg

  • Haha 7
Posted

A lot of users in here are serving:

 

spacer.png

  • Haha 5
sourprint
Posted
46 minutes ago, Anticipating said:

She's crying on social media every two business days. I think this affects her more than you think it does.

tvhza82bvt361.jpg

 

40 minutes ago, SoldierofLove said:

A lot of users in here are serving:

 

spacer.png

wonder what she could sacrifice next

Posted

One of the biggest BOMBS from a pop girl of all time

 

AapruyF.thumb.gif.248e0100a4a6eb3c6adbbc

Posted

People are blaming the song, but I think if this was on Emails I Cant Send and sung by Sabrina, it would be a fun pop song like Feather. Selena's vocals have really fallen off. They sound really autotuned here, almost like vocal fry split, lazy, with no enunciation. :/  If she recorded this in like 2016 it would be have been a guilty pleasure bop I fear.

Posted

This is even worse than a Demi level of floppage :rip:

Posted

omg she's so over

Posted

what do u expect from an artist that has shown  0 growth. the sympathy phase is over.

Posted

Poor ha. The song is horrible and sounds like another generic mess. 
 

selena gomez smiling GIF

Posted

Day 4

 

Global : #171(RE) — 1,225,353 plays

 

Well... :wave:

  • Like 1
Posted
4 hours ago, burninredhot said:

Day 4

 

Global : #171(RE) — 1,225,353 plays

 

Well... :wave:

:suburban:

Posted

Will this even be able to chart on Hot 100? :rip:

Posted

Not the illuminati stuff again :bibliahh: Selenators co-signing :bibliahh:

  • Haha 3
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.