Jump to content

What’s more impressive? Debuting or rising to a high spot on the BBH100


punisher

What’s more impressive? Debuting or rising to a high spot on the BBH100  

110 members have voted

  1. 1. Debuting Or Rising?

    • Debuting
      14
    • Rising
      95


Recommended Posts

Do you think it’s more impressive when an artist debuts at #1 or rises to #1

Which one is usually the real hit?

Edited by punisher
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 56
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Digitalism

    3

  • punisher

    3

  • swissman

    2

  • Mezter

    1

Top Posters In This Topic

Imo it kinda depends on the artist because sometimes fans just mass stream and mass buy like Army’s

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Rising obviously 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, rising, because anyone could get their random viral/meme moment and debut high only for people to forget about it after two weeks :giraffe:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Before: Debuting for sure. It was almost impossible to acheive this.

 

Now: Rising for sure. Everyone can debut at #1 these days and many #1 songs are not even that famous anymore. 

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Depends on the artist. 

 

If someone like Taylor, whose fanbase is massive, debuts at #1 and free-falls like with her re-recording singles, it's nothing impressive. 

 

If someone like Dua, whose singles rely heavily on the GP and take time to explode, goes top 10,  that's more impressive. 

 

Then you have artists like Olivia who is only in her 2nd era and can debut at #1, that's also impressive. 

Edited by thatsmydemi
  • Like 4
  • Haha 1
  • Thumbs Down 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Rising for sure, it show longevity of the song. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hmmm it looks like #that fanbase needs to let go of their ‘highest solo debut on the billboard hot 100 from a female rapper in 2023’ brag

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Debuting at #1 shows a strong fanbase power something that it's day by day more and more relevant in streaming era. Cuz huge fanbase = huge catalog streams. So it is impressive and it means something relevant in streaming era.

 

But rising to #1 is still more impressive cuz it's the prove that u have a real smash hit in ur hands. Debuts come and go. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Debuting at #1 is for artist with big fan bases but clearly there's little support from the gp since they probably haven't even listened to the track.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think both are impressive depending on the artist. 

 

Debuting at #1 can be a sign that you have a strong and loyal fanbase, which is something very important for you in the long run. You can rise to #1 and then people move on from you.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

rising 

 

even without achieving number one, staying in the top 10 for months is a lot more impressive these days than debuting high and falling quick 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It used to be debuting but now rising is a better sign of a legitimate hit imo

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Rising. I miss when this was actually a thing as opposed to everything just debuting at #1 now. It makes it seem like such a nonevent now 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Most of the songs rely on radio you can spend weeks in the top 10 and not even have the most streamed song of the week. 
 

Debuting yes there are some circumstances where song depended heavily on mass streaming. But if you can score a #1 back to back it means the GP will consume your singles every time. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

debuting high just looks like a scam these days as a lot of the songs drop like a rock after.

I love seeing a climb idk 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Obviously rising, BUT it's a big thing as well if you can debut and not free fall the week after, by having a respectable run even inside the top 5 which is really rare for the streaming weekly "hits" of the 20s.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think it depends on the situation. Both can be impressive.

Debuting at a high and finding stability there is quite impressive. Freefalling after a high debut is not.
Lower debut but rising over time to a high spot is incredibly impressive to me and is a much clear indication of growth for a song.

Either way stability & longevity on the charts is the common factor between the two.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, thatsmydemi said:

If someone like Taylor, whose fanbase is massive, debuts at #1 and free-falls like with her re-recording singles, it's nothing impressive. 

Even debuting high with re-recordings is impressive. 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Rising.

 

An artist could always debut high sure but can fall off after 1 week while rising is a more stable run

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A #1 debut indicates a strong fan base, a climb to #1 indicates GP interest and/or radio payola

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.