celeb news Johnny Depp vs. Amber Heard Trial

[Gaia]

On 6/9/2022 at 4:48 PM, Raiden said:

No hun, debunking Elaine (who, lest we forget, STARTED doing the media rounds) is not a smear nor a PR campaign. It's merely setting the record straight.

 

Who needs PR is the one who is pretending to be destitute and bankrupt, while she is lavishly spending

 

 

 

Oh and by the way today is time to light y'all candles, warriors for justice, diversity (JD is part American Indian) and authentic feminism.

 

 

I’m dying at the blatant hypocrisy  

 

Amber’s team was on talk shows the NEXT DAY slandering Johnny, the jury, and his legal team and now there’s an issue with Johnny’s team doing the same to Amber  

[Chris]

5 minutes ago, Gaia said:

I’m dying at the blatant hypocrisy

This is lazy and obnoxious...

 

[Chris]

5 hours ago, Raiden said:

It has been addressed by countless experts, not hacks like you but actual licensed lawyers and other professionals. Many of them attended the trial (literally in court, they were the ones sitting front row behind all the JD and AH desks. They examined both the law and the facts or evidence — and overwhelmingly ended up agreeing with the jury. Which is also what I did: independently came to my conclusions as the trial proceeded. Until midway thru the trial I was still not leaning one way or the other — was still open minded about who was guilty.  Which is how it should be.

 

As for your swipe at Camille don't worry — she is a strong woman and, as you can see she has no fear exposing AH fans' sexism by the use of a tired old stereotypes against women:

 

 

 

This absolute SCALP!

 

 

I don't expect any of them to reply or address this though... , they'll just randomly come back to post another girl-boss moment from Amber Heard.

[Raiden]

Poor Elaine — she's still out there working her ass off for her client, yet the client continues to undermine her:

 

She could have saved herself if she had heeded the advice of the black dude that was with her on CBS morning show

 

 

[Communion]

6 hours ago, Chris said:

Literally 99.9% of your posts are obnoxious, are you kidding?

Sis, you're out of your depth here. 

[Communion]

6 hours ago, Chris said:

This absolute SCALP!

 

 

I don't expect any of them to reply or address this though... , they'll just randomly come back to post another girl-boss moment from Amber Heard.

The legal experts they're referencing are.... Megyn Kelly and Jeanine Piro. 

 

Is it "girl-bossing" to you to point out that said user is lying and that they were some of the first posts in this thread, attacking Heard, just days into the trial? You can look for yourself at their hundreds of post in this thread: 

https://atrl.net/profile/18047-raiden/content/page/4/?all_activity=1

 

"Most of us were impartial and waited to hear the facts deep into the trial!"

Day 10 of what was literally a 50 day trial: "FRAUD GETTING EXPOSED! HAHA!"

Edited June 11, 2022 by Communion

[kawk]

7 hours ago, Raiden said:

Poor Elaine — she's still out there working her ass off for her client, yet the client continues to undermine her:

 

how are TURDS still supporting this CERTIFIED LIAR AND ABUSER 

[Patient Zero]

Private jet?

Strange, because she was never rich enough for such luxury.

 

She must have a sugardaddy. Musk seems like an obvious candidate. They deserve each other, though.

 

 

[Mobility Mary]

Why is such blatant misogyny allowed?

You'd at least expect gays to be immune to hatred so many straight men have towards women, but nope

[Chris]

Calling out Amber Heard after openly hearing her start fights on audio is misogyny now?

 

Jeez. 

[worldwide angel]

6 hours ago, Mobility Mary said:

Why is such blatant misogyny allowed?

You'd at least expect gays to be immune to hatred so many straight men have towards women, but nope

sadly its been very common on here and irl 

 

the girls will believe amber when its too late despite the receipts pointing towards her being truthful. they’re in it for the spectacle, not the truth. calling amber supporters virtue signalers and abuse apologists like that’s not what they are by defending johnny in spite of his history of abuse and bigotry

[Patient Zero]

6 hours ago, Mobility Mary said:

Why is such blatant misogyny allowed?

You'd at least expect gays to be immune to hatred so many straight men have towards women, but nope

I agree, I definitely don't understand the Camille hate

[Mobility Mary]

3 hours ago, Chris said:

Calling out Amber Heard after openly hearing her start fights on audio is misogyny now?

 

Jeez. 

Don't play dumb lol. First of all if you are calling her out for the tapes and not Johnny, that just means you haven't listened to those tapes in full and only listened to short versions. Second of all, there is a way to not believe Amber without being misogynistic af about it. Not sure how someone who's not a misogynist could ever support Johnny, even if they somehow thought Amber was the abuser, but just because you believe him it doesn't mean you have to make sexist comments.

[Merlls]

32 minutes ago, Mobility Mary said:

Don't play dumb lol. First of all if you are calling her out for the tapes and not Johnny, that just means you haven't listened to those tapes in full and only listened to short versions. Second of all, there is a way to not believe Amber without being misogynistic af about it. Not sure how someone who's not a misogynist could ever support Johnny, even if they somehow thought Amber was the abuser, but just because you believe him it doesn't mean you have to make sexist comments.

Darling, you were cheerleading for the liar in this trial. Accept and move on with your life. Stop overthinking about it. x

[Raiden]

3 hours ago, worldwide angel said:

sadly its been very common on here and irl 

 

the girls will believe amber when its too late

You're dreaming. It won't happen — as you can see AH continues to deceive, lie and cheat even after the trial is over — say one thing and do another. She's unrepentant. Not the kind of person who will evolve and bring other people towards them to evolve and grow with.

 

 

Quote

despite the receipts pointing towards her being truthful.

Where are the so called receipts? Like the nothingburgers that Elaine is floating? (she's been going around yapping about rejected medical "evidence" during her media interviews — guess what, it turns out what she's talking about are therapy notes (basically AH dictating bullshit to her therapist). So rightfully judge Penney Azcarate threw that into the trash as hearsay. Therapy notes can't and shouldn't be treated as equal to medical evidence — the latter is based on science (real sh*t like biology and chemistry).

 

 

Edited June 11, 2022 by Raiden

[worldwide angel]

2 hours ago, Raiden said:

You're dreaming. It won't happen — as you can see AH continues to deceive, lie and cheat even after the trial is over — say one thing and do another. She's unrepentant. Not the kind of person who will evolve and bring other people towards them to evolve and grow with.

 

 

Where are the so called receipts? Like the nothingburgers that Elaine is floating? (she's been going around yapping about rejected medical "evidence" during her media interviews — guess what, it turns out what she's talking about are therapy notes (basically AH dictating bullshit to her therapist). So rightfully judge Penney Azcarate threw that into the trash as hearsay. Therapy notes can't and shouldn't be treated as equal to medical evidence — the latter is based on science (real sh*t like biology and chemistry).

 

 

you’re being bold but the truth will become mainstream and the girls who sat there and laughed at amber’s abuse bc “she was lying!!1!1!” will finally see themselves as the nasty clowns they are. its probably why people are so reluctant to look through the UK trial,  the full length audio of johnny and amber’s conversations, and the medical records.  

 

 

also not you discrediting her therapy notes as BS, so bc its “not scientific” it’s just wholly inaccurate?   i find it very convenient that potential evidence of emotional abuse and trauma is suddenly BS

[Communion]

Of course someone who cites Fox News as a source claims psychiatry as a whole is not a "science". 

 

This has always been a confidence project for men's rights activists, incels and Republicans in some culture war. Depp is their savior against everything they find wrong with society - "political correctness", feminism and women. 

 

"Johnny was joking when laughing about raping her. You libs are so PC " 

[Mobility Mary]

Who was the person who wrote "The truth will come out eventually, I think. For now we stand with talent. We stand with dignity. We stand with innocence. We stand with Amber." at the beginning of the trial? I still use that quote to this day, it's way too iconic.

[Daydream]

 

Give it up Deelishis. Justice was served. Johnny won. Amber lost. There’s nothing more to be said.

[Gaia]

So if Johnny had Therapy notes where he claimed Amber was a compulsive liar and abused him, suddenly you’d believe him? 

Edited June 12, 2022 by Gaia

[Raiden]

11 hours ago, worldwide angel said:

you’re being bold but the truth will become mainstream and the girls who sat there and laughed at amber’s abuse bc “she was lying!!1!1!” will finally see themselves as the nasty clowns they are.

You'll be waiting till hell freezes over. No I'm afraid AH will forever be what she is now — a liar and a grifter. According to this blind item it is not Elon Musk himself but a friend of Elon who is currently funding her lavish lifestyle. If that's so, then this mofo will have to fork over the 7 or 8 million that AH now owes JD according to the law. Or alternatively the ACLU should foot the bill. After all, they ghostwrote the op-ed for her and placed it in the Washington Post, using their connections. So effectively when the jury found that AH defamed JD, in reality it is the ACLU that defamed JD. So it would only be justice if the ACLU pays the penalty to JD. As the Breaking Points perfectly summed it up here:

 

 

Quote

its probably why people are so reluctant to look through the UK trial,  the full length audio of johnny and amber’s conversations, and the medical records.  

 

 

also not you discrediting her therapy notes as BS, so bc its “not scientific” it’s just wholly inaccurate?   i find it very convenient that potential evidence of emotional abuse and trauma is suddenly BS

You don't know sh*t about the UK trial — otherwise you would have known that the US trial actually DID take the UK trial into account — and in fact sifted thru the evidence presented there earlier. So ironically the US jury ended up making a better use of the  UK evidence than that one corrupt UK judge who had multiple conflicts of interest. In fact one of the pivotal moments in the US trial was when Camille Vasquez used AH's UK deposition where AH inadvertently admits she dispatched TMZ. AH literally swiped her face with both hands out of embarrassment. What did the UK judge do with this evidence in its own case? Evidently nothing. Thank holy saint Camille that the US jury didn't make the same mistake and overlook AH's blatant scheming caught in the act in candid camera. In other words the US case dealt better with even the UK evidence.

 

 

 

 

[Mobility Mary]

The delusion

Amber won't pay that bloated rapist wife beater a penny. At least wait for the appeal to be finalized before you start knocking on her door to pay your fictional boyfriend his blood money.

[worldwide angel]

2 hours ago, Raiden said:

You'll be waiting till hell freezes over. No I'm afraid AH will forever be what she is now — a liar and a grifter. According to this blind item it is not Elon Musk himself but a friend of Elon who is currently funding her lavish lifestyle. If that's so, then this mofo will have to fork over the 7 or 8 million that AH now owes JD according to the law. Or alternatively the ACLU should foot the bill. After all, they ghostwrote the op-ed for her and placed it in the Washington Post, using their connections. So effectively when the jury found that AH defamed JD, in reality it is the ACLU that defamed JD. So it would only be justice if the ACLU pays the penalty to JD. As the Breaking Points perfectly summed it up here:

 

 

You don't know sh*t about the UK trial — otherwise you would have known that the US trial actually DID take the UK trial into account — and in fact sifted thru the evidence presented there earlier. So ironically the US jury ended up making a better use of the  UK evidence than that one corrupt UK judge who had multiple conflicts of interest. In fact one of the pivotal moments in the US trial was when Camille Vasquez used AH's UK deposition where AH inadvertently admits she dispatched TMZ. AH literally swiped her face with both hands out of embarrassment. What did the UK judge do with this evidence in its own case? Evidently nothing. Thank holy saint Camille that the US jury didn't make the same mistake and overlook AH's blatant scheming caught in the act in candid camera. In other words the US case dealt better with even the UK evidence.

 

 

 

 

sources: a blind item and a biased youtube video

 

the US jury that was not sequestered and exposed to social media fanfare made better use of the UK trial? ooookay  

[Chris]

All of the evidence that has been presented in this thread has been presented to the jury and they have already made their verdict.

 

So what is the point of even continuing this entire discussion?

 

And when are the Amber Heard supporters going to call out what she does/did WITHOUT pulling the misogyny card?

 

WITHOUT calling him a wife beater?

 

WITHOUT calling him a rapist? 

 

WITHOUT accusing everyone of "hating" women (which is one of the most absurd things ever)?

 

Hm?

[Mobility Mary]

No one is forcing you to constantly check the topic only to complain about people still talking about it lmao. Now that the wife beater turned off his bots, the supporters he has left are fuming they can't silence people speaking out against misogyny.