celeb news Johnny Depp vs. Amber Heard Trial

[Ari29]

28 minutes ago, Communion said:

I'm sorry but at this point you're being exhausting and obtuse. There is literally no connection between Amber Heard and this random case you've decided to cite other than both being white blonde women;

 

- The court did not find that Heard submitted fraudulent evidence; I can only imagine you're trying to reference photos that have metadata on them with specific dates despite expert testimony about how opening photos across multiple devices can make a file seem like it was updated despite not. Though you're also the person who doubled-down and claimed photos were edited or manipulated despite it being explained in court that the program used to store said photos on Amber's devices literally did not have such photo-editing capabilities.

- You believe they don't align with her injuries;

A few post back I literally went over 3 of the many points that are exactly the same in both cases. You know next to nothing about the case I’m referring to but feel comfortable enough to declare there’s no link. If anyone is obtuse it’s the person arguing there’s no connections between something they’re not familiar with at all. 
 

1. The admission that violence likely went both ways. That was stated with Johnny and Amber correct?

 

2. Them using the issue of substance abuse as reasoning for them likely being abusers. This was also a factor in the Johnny and Amber case, correct?

 

3. Initially both were believed until more concrete evidence of their abuse became known. Isn’t that exactly what’s happening now in the Amber and Johnny situation? 
 

Your arrogance and dismissiveness saying there’s no link when you have no real knowledge of the other case is laughable. 

Me and apparently the rest of the world with an actual working brain didn’t think they aligned either. But of course we’re all wrong and you’re right. 

 

Edited June 2, 2022 by Ari29

[#Beautiful]

1 minute ago, BobBertran1992 said:

Ah yes, the first question. Yes, I'm going to let my ''hate'' for that party dictate my decision, because they're a political party, not someone who did not invite me to their birthday: I hate what they stand for, and I hate that they block measures to progress society (in the US). If they're celebrating this it's because it sets a precedent for powerful men to shut victims down who speak up against their abusers. 

 

Notice, for instance, how JK Rowling wrote her essay against trans rights, and then was quoted by a GOP senator (and now many states are criminalizing trans youth). The GOP is a party that is going to do everything it can to destroy the lives of vulnerable people, and that includes victims of abuse of any kind or any gender.  

 

Again, I hate the GOP, and any conservative party, because I hate what they stand for, and how that ideology wrecks people's lifes. 

I agree and I hate the right too because they're total scum although it doesn't count for anything this case is related to but thank you for actually answering to that! 

[tiagol88]

57 minutes ago, Raiden said:

This is how an innocent ex behaves ⬇️⬇️ with iconic command of the truth and presenting it with grace, class, and so much (inner) beauty. An example for women — heck, for men too. And JD, being a good man, knows it only too well now. He is well aware that he downgraded bigly when he went from dating with KM to with AH — that's like the relationship equivalent of politically moving from Martin Luther King to Adolf Hitler.

 

 

I mean...Winona Ryder still speaks very highly of him and says her experience with him couldn't be more different than Amber and they dated for 3 years from 1990 and 1993. Kate Moss was in a relationship with him for 4 years from 1994 until 1998 and has mentioned multiple times how tough this breakup was to her. She testified for him in the case. Vanessa Paradis dated him from 1998 until 2012 and again, she DEFENDS him in every chance she gets and clearly they remained amicable. Just like Depp has been with most of his exes. We have his dating history from 1990 until 2012 and suddenly he became this terrible human being with Amber out of nowhere? 

 

Sometimes abused people actually do turn violent against their abusers you know? This isn't unheard of. It's clear he started spiraling out of control during the relationship with Amber and his addictions as well. He wasn't like this during his marriage with Vanessa. 

 

It's pretty telling when your exes are there for you decades / years after your relationships end tbh.

 

How many Amber's exes mention how great of a person she is? lmao...not counting people that she hit before of course.

 

I'm not saying he's an amazing human being but it's quite telling everything about him changed once he got together with this woman. 

Edited June 2, 2022 by tiagol88

[CaptainMusic]

Thanks to Amber it will be even harder for many women to be believed now smh 

[Communion]

8 minutes ago, Ari29 said:

1. The admission that violence likely went both ways. That was stated with Johnny and Amber correct?

Amber Heard pushing a door back as Depp tried to break it down to get to her, or mocking him as a weak man who ran away from problems he caused because she resented his put-downs once black-out drunk, or throwing his property away or damaging it in some capacity (which she only had in her possession because it had just smacked her in the face), or filming him without his consent are quite literally in no way comparable to someone committing murder; no one agrees with you.  That you even find it appropriate to make such comparisons shows you're disingenuous.

[Looolqueen]

This is a great lawyer breaking down the testimony in Depp vs Heard and explaining why Amber lost, for anyone who is interested.

 

 

Edited June 2, 2022 by Looolqueen

[#Beautiful]

7 minutes ago, Looolqueen said:

This is a great lawyer breaking down the testimony in Depp vs Heard and explaining why Amber lost, for anyone who is interested.

 

 

an interesting read

[Ferret]

24 minutes ago, CaptainMusic said:

Thanks to Amber it will be even harder for many women to be believed now smh 

Correct. It’s totally Amber’s fault if there will be repercussions for women in the future due to this case. She thought people would believe her incoherence and lies.

[Looolqueen]

23 minutes ago, CaptainMusic said:

Thanks to Amber it will be even harder for many women to be believed now smh 

Thankfully, not all women are like Amber, so this is not going to affect women OR men who will TRUTHFULLY speak out.

[Cloröx]

13 minutes ago, Looolqueen said:

This is a great lawyer breaking down the testimony in Depp vs Heard and explaining why Amber lost, for anyone who is interested.

 

 

Oh wow 

[bjorn]

18 minutes ago, Looolqueen said:

This is a great lawyer breaking down the testimony in Depp vs Heard and explaining why Amber lost, for anyone who is interested.

 

 

This is for every pro-Amber fan.

 

End of discussion. Depp won.

 

 

[Mobility Mary]

29 minutes ago, Looolqueen said:

This is a great lawyer breaking down the testimony in Depp vs Heard and explaining why Amber lost, for anyone who is interested.

 

 

Literally Johnny propaganda disguised as “objective facts”, reminds me of certain members here. I should have stopped reading at “who wept on stand” part, at least that fat old man gave us a good chuckle I guess 

[Looolqueen]

15 minutes ago, Mobility Mary said:

Literally Johnny propaganda disguised as “objective facts”

The level of complete DELUSION wow

Edited June 2, 2022 by Looolqueen

[Raiden]

6 minutes ago, Nexto said:

 

OT: Reminder that Mr Depp fantasized about drowning, burning and r*ping Amber's corpse. Reminder that this is the type of person Depp stans choose to support. 

GTFO. That was a Monty Python joke (the idea to hurt someone to find out if they are indestructible, like a witch or something — an activity that last time took place in medieval times in the real world.

 

By the way that also exposes how JD's opponents went on a fishing expedition to see what kind of stuff JD had said about AH in private correspondences with third parties, as if that proves he abused her (not it doesn't, it only proves his contempt of her perhaps).

 

Ironic that all they could find that to use in court was that Monty Python joke + plus that flappy fish market thing. A rather thin harvest in light of the length of the acrimony and vitriol that was even caught on tape. Also the other side was denied the same opportunity: to subpoena Amber's correspondences with her buddies (like Elon for example, on grounds that he faced a security risk. AH and her Billionaire protection racket. In other words proving that she was just as privileged, contrary to her utterly bogus pretensions that JD was the only one with privileges in the relationship.
 

[Communion]

54 minutes ago, Looolqueen said:

This is a great lawyer breaking down the testimony in Depp vs Heard and explaining why Amber lost, for anyone who is interested.

 

 

Half of her recent tweets being #MenToo and mocking Amber. 

 

Sis, at least just be forward that you want someone to confirm how you feel regardless of accuracy. 

 

There are lots of issues she's ignoring, but this is particularly jarring:

 

Because medical experts also testified that Depp's injury could not have occured from how he claimed:

Why leave this info out? Because it shows that much of Depp's claims were contradicted too? Sis. 

Edited June 2, 2022 by Communion

[Mobility Mary]

That was NOT a Mony Python joke, the corpse rape was all Johnny, never mentioned in MP 

[Looolqueen]

6 minutes ago, Communion said:

Half of her recent tweets being #MenToo and mocking Amber. 

 

Sis, at least just be forward that you want someone to confirm how you feel regardless of accuracy. 

 

There are lots of issues she's ignoring, but this is particularly jarring:

Sis, I don't need to the court of LAW along with the whole world confirmed how they feel about this.

[Headlock]

3 hours ago, Raiden said:

You're being reductive.

 

Try to be deductive instead.

 

It's the do-nothing-Dems who are screwing the fortunes of their own electorate by not passing protective legislation (that codified Roe v Wade) but instead do nothing but hijack good causes like feminism and #metoo for party political purposes and end up undermining the cause.

 

In this case, and organizing an adversarial scam system whereby grifters like AH thought it was there for them to exploit. AH came along because the Dems tried to frame #metoo as a rallying cause against a Republican president, not as a universal movement to protect all women. As if sexual abuse was the exclusive turf of perps who vote "the wrong way" or something. By politicizing the matter they created a loophole, a scam system — and in doing so they opened the door for AH who from her taped comments clearly admits that she had and advantage to game the system, taunting JD to try and see if it works for him to present himself as a victim.

 

I have nothing to say to you, your posts on this thread have been consistently repulsive, and this time is no different.

[Communion]

4 minutes ago, Looolqueen said:

Sis, I don't need to the court of LAW along with the whole world confirmed how they feel about this.

Is that why you felt so insecure about the other expert witness testimony that you not only refuse to address it like the thread refuses but deleted any mention of it from my quote? 

[Headlock]

2 hours ago, FOCK said:

Elon, as in Amber’s likely baby daddy, ex boyfriend and the one paying her legal fees & “pledges”? 

You do realize this has absolutely nothing to do with what I said 

So thanks for proving my point I guess? 

[Communion]

"Those upset are just emotional Amber fanatics removed from reality"

 

Deep supporters:

- Claim that they're convinced Depp was right based on edited audio illegally leaked by a lawyer banned from the case

- Think Heard is guilty due to the history of how white women treat black men despite Johnny Depp being white 

- Say that Amber coming into Depp's life was like the political rise of Hitler. 

 

[FOCK]

Amber selling stories, photo-opportunities and tapes to the press, publishing op-eds & lying about donations: Pass.

Tweets supporting Depp: PR stunts. It’s a campaign!

 

Amber having a bruise one day and gone the next: Makes sense.

Depp having several police and witness testimonies who saw nothing: Lies. They’re all perjuring themselves, Amber is the only one capable of the truth. 

 

Amber claiming she had cut up feet & her head beaten in with hard rings & only a photo of a mirror & a medical record that contradicted any injuries: Plausible.  

Depp having a finger severed and medical records to prove it: He did it to himself.

 

Amber’s mysteriously disappearing & inconsistent bruising she staged & sold to the press, that was provenly enhanced & edited & didn’t at all match the severity of her claims: Victim. Self defence.

Depp’s bruising: Instigator. Can’t be self defence.

 

Amber admitting to abuse on tape and asking Depp to stay and fight: She was emotional & reactive. Not evidence of instigating abuse.

Depp on audio attempting to remove himself from a situation, asking her not to fight & trying to calm her breakdowns: Abuser. 

 

Amber having a revolving circle of friends around her at all times, living in Depp’s apartments rent free with master keys: He’s an abuser who isolated her!

Depp: TF?

 

Several of Amber’s own witnesses contradicting her account: Makes sense.

Depp’s witnesses supporting his account: Liars. On the payroll. Fame hungry.

 

Amber utilising the metoo movement as a career opportunity, stealing victim stories & claiming abuse as some badge of honour: Admirable.

Depp’s team clarifying that this is a self-serving mockery of the movement and victims: He’s set back women 100 years. 

 

Y’all are either emotionally inept, have a challenging time deciphering people’s behaviour, or lack the life experience, thankfully, of having the misfortune of meeting someone like Amber, male or female. 

Edited June 2, 2022 by FOCK

[tiagol88]

6 minutes ago, FOCK said:

Amber selling stories and tapes to the press, publishing op-eds & lying about donations: Pass.

Tweets supporting Depp: PR stunts. It’s a campaign!

 

Amber having a bruise one day and gone the next: Makes sense.

Depp having several police and witness testimonies who saw nothing: Lies. They’re all perjuring themselves, Amber is the only one capable of the truth. 

 

Amber claiming she had cut up feet & her head beaten in with hard rings & only a photo of a mirror & a medical record that contradicted any injuries: Plausible.  

Depp having a finger severed and medical records to prove it: He did it to himself.

 

Amber’s mysteriously disappearing & inconsistent bruising she staged & sold to the press, that was provenly enhanced & edited & didn’t at all match the severity of her claims: Victim. Self defence.

Depp’s bruising: Instigator. Can’t be self defence.

 

Amber admitting to abuse on tape: She was emotional & reactive. Not evidence of instigating abuse.

Depp on audio attempting to remove himself from a situation, asking her not to fight & trying to calm her breakdowns: Abuser. 

 

Amber having a revolving circle of friends around her at all times, living in Depp’s apartments rent free with master keys: He’s am abuser who isolated her!

Depp: TF?

 

Several of Amber’s own witnesses contradicting her account: Makes sense.

Depp’s witnesses supporting his account: Liars. On the payroll. Fame hungry.

 

Amber utilising the metoo movement as a career opportunity, stealing victim stories & claiming abuse as some badge of honour: Admirable.

Depp’s team clarifying that this is a self-serving mockery of the movement and victims: He’s set back women 100 years. 

 

Y’all are either emotionally inept, have a challenging time deciphering people’s behaviour, or lack the life experience, thankfully, of having the misfortune of meeting someone like Amber, male or female. 

I mean... amber didn't admit doing anything wrong during these weeks. She kept saying she never even hit Johnny right after admitting to it in a tape 

[FOCK]

Depp may be an alcoholic, drug-abusing, misogynist until the end of his days - it's perfectly fine to recognise this, without having to force yourself into a pretzel to believe Heard's clear lies.  

[Raiden]

1 hour ago, Nexto said:

 

So the fact that he was alledgedly quoting a sketch makes it okay for him to make such gross and disgusting statements? Do y'all even hear yourselves? God I hope victims of abuse won't ever read some of the vile bullshit that's being posted on this site...

JD didn't make a statement.

 

That was part of a private message between him and his friend (that was gotten after a fishing expedition by subpoenaing private correspondences between him and third party individuals (other than AH).... while at the same time not allowing his team the same rights (to bring into court private correspondence between AH and her fuckbuddies or between AH and other third parties, in order to verify whether she had fulfilled her promises to donate to charity for example. All that and countless other evidence was automatically rejected as inadmissible to consider for that fraudulent UK trial, where the court never bothered to check whether AH had really paid or not — preferring to take her claim at her word instead. It was in such fraudulent ways that the Murdoch judge (whose son works in the newspaper business) decided to deliver a miscarriage of justice, driven by his ambition, establishment greed and conflict of interest.

Edited June 2, 2022 by Raiden