Gam Posted February 10 Posted February 10 Just now, Almodusa said: “ASIB didn’t help” anyway @ that account… yeah... i'm just gonna ignore everything they said now 1
WildAmerican Posted February 10 Posted February 10 maybe what that means is that Chromatica wasn't a mega smash era like they wanted it to be, so ASIB's success didn't help Chroma? But Chroma being only moderately successful is their fault cause they gave up on it.... 2 1
Reginald Posted February 10 Posted February 10 Why do the tweets sound a little ATRL'd, though "Gaga Sales/Brand" Just bring Mother Monster-style theatrics back, that's the brand we all miss
dawnettakins Posted February 10 Posted February 10 Oh please be serious. So tired of these "insiders" they don't know ****. They only thing likely is that only the lead is ready, not the entire album. But likely coming along and should be done soon as well I imagine. 1
Dawn the Jockey Posted February 10 Posted February 10 (edited) How can they claim they are only on PR and distribution but at the same time can claim to know the status of songs in the studio? Genuine question lol Edited February 10 by Dawn the Jockey
Aston Martin Posted February 10 Posted February 10 “ASIB didn’t help” like it didn’t give her demand for an all-stadium tour and enough hype to get her best first week sales since 2011. The ball was dropped afterwards, and no one’s disputing that, but c’mon though if they’re really making sure everything goes according to plan this time around (and the plans are good ones) then I won’t complain at all. 2 3
Jack! Posted February 10 Posted February 10 I love Chromatica so this isn't a dig, and I also don't want to give major credence to those tweets, but compared to 3 of her peers who released big pop albums in 2020 with a big enough single, she was outsold by people like Dua and Ariana and although she did push more than Miley, only slightly. So in the grand scheme of what could have been achieved that year, I think there's a chance they could feel they undersold. 3
SmittenCake Posted February 10 Posted February 10 will she go back to arena tours? or is it only stadiums now? :(
Aston Martin Posted February 10 Posted February 10 Just now, SmittenCake said: will she go back to arena tours? or is it only stadiums now? :( I personally think she’s going to stick to stadiums for the time being. A shorter all-stadium tour seems more manageable for her health than a longer arena tour. But anything’s possible tbh.
dawnettakins Posted February 10 Posted February 10 (edited) It's clear they dropped the ball but come on. Gaga got her biggest debut with Chromatica literally except for BTW, and got another #1 song that was a smash hit in much of the world. That's WITH a lead single that leaked a month in advance, AND an album that got delayed for 6 weeks due to a global pandemic. But ASIB was able to do all that, PLUS help sell out a stadium tour that was delayed 2+ years due to the same pandemic. ASIB didn't help Gaga and her brand my ass. This **** is delusional and doesn't know a lick what he's talking about. Edited February 10 by dawnettakins 1
Dawn the Jockey Posted February 10 Posted February 10 (edited) “Keep in mind no tracks have been mastered yet” Im sorry but there’s just absolutely no way this is true, not after last nights IG posts 💀 Edited February 10 by Dawn the Jockey 3
PlERRE Posted February 10 Posted February 10 I can't believe the pre-LG7 era will be remembered as the era of the battle of the "insiders". 2
nick4bty Posted February 10 Posted February 10 As if Chromatica would’ve debuted anywhere near 270k without ASIB also Billie situation, wtf are they talking about. Billie’s last era was a flop. Olivia’s last era was a flop. Madonna’s last era was a flop. Maroon 5’s last era was a flop. Interscope is ******* awful if anything they were probably thrilled with how Chromatica performed
lgaga1fan Posted February 10 Posted February 10 Y'all are reaching for the stars rn. He obviously didn't mean ASIB helped in no way. He said the label insider he spoke to said "ASIB didn't help the GAGA brand" because it didn't help the GAGA brand. What's not clicking? Chromatica wasn't as massive or as big as the GAGA era's that we used to get on impact. It was like a better performing Joanne era now that we've been four years out. Does that make it bad or anything? Obviously not, it's just that it was a disappointing outcome considering how big ASIB was. Because ASIB and GAGA have little to no crossover appeal in brand value. From a label perspective you can clearly see how the GAGA brand wasn't positively impacted outside of more casual fans attending shows. Bloody Mary was a meme and was more impactful to Gaga's overall brand perception (in a good way) for the younger generation of listeners than a large portion of Chromatica was no tea. For a label that is focused on making money from MUSIC and not other ventures that Gaga does, I can see why they would think that Chromatica was a dissapointment, especially with the amount of investment on promotion and brand deals they had going into the era that didn't get to see the light of day bc of Covid. 10
SmittenCake Posted February 10 Posted February 10 11 minutes ago, Aston Martin said: I personally think she’s going to stick to stadiums for the time being. A shorter all-stadium tour seems more manageable for her health than a longer arena tour. But anything’s possible tbh. aww
lgaga1fan Posted February 10 Posted February 10 5 minutes ago, Dawn the Jockey said: “Keep in mind no tracks have been mastered yet” Im sorry but there’s just absolutely no way this is true, not after last nights IG posts 💀 Do you forget in Five Foot Two where they were literally mastering album tracks the night the album released or...
GraceRandolph Posted February 10 Posted February 10 10 minutes ago, dawnettakins said: It's clear they dropped the ball but come on. Gaga got her biggest debut with Chromatica literally except for BTW, and got another #1 song that was a smash hit in much of the world. That's WITH a lead single that leaked a month in advance, AND an album that got delayed for 6 weeks due to a global pandemic. But ASIB was able to do all that, PLUS help sell out a stadium tour that was delayed 2+ years due to the same pandemic. ASIB didn't help Gaga and her brand my ass. This **** is delusional and doesn't know a lick what he's talking about. I love Chromatica, but it could’ve been much bigger. Like c’mon now. 1
nick4bty Posted February 10 Posted February 10 1 minute ago, lgaga1fan said: Y'all are reaching for the stars rn. He obviously didn't mean ASIB helped in no way. He said the label insider he spoke to said "ASIB didn't help the GAGA brand" because it didn't help the GAGA brand. What's not clicking? Chromatica wasn't as massive or as big as the GAGA era's that we used to get on impact. It was like a better performing Joanne era now that we've been four years out. Does that make it bad or anything? Obviously not, it's just that it was a disappointing outcome considering how big ASIB was. Because ASIB and GAGA have little to no crossover appeal in brand value. From a label perspective you can clearly see how the GAGA brand wasn't positively impacted outside of more casual fans attending shows. Bloody Mary was a meme and was more impactful to Gaga's overall brand perception (in a good way) for the younger generation of listeners than a large portion of Chromatica was no tea. For a label that is focused on making money from MUSIC and not other ventures that Gaga does, I can see why they would think that Chromatica was a dissapointment, especially with the amount of investment on promotion and brand deals they had going into the era that didn't get to see the light of day bc of Covid. What drugs are you on? ASIB is the only reason the Gaga brand is thriving
dawnettakins Posted February 10 Posted February 10 Just now, GraceRandolph said: I love Chromatica, but it could’ve been much bigger. Like c’mon now. Obviously. But they're acting like it tanked her brand or somehow didn't improve it at all. It did. But due to her and her team dropping the ball after release, yea the longevity wise is super disappointing. Should have been better. 2
Gam Posted February 10 Posted February 10 2 minutes ago, lgaga1fan said: Y'all are reaching for the stars rn. He obviously didn't mean ASIB helped in no way. He said the label insider he spoke to said "ASIB didn't help the GAGA brand" because it didn't help the GAGA brand. What's not clicking? Chromatica wasn't as massive or as big as the GAGA era's that we used to get on impact. It was like a better performing Joanne era now that we've been four years out. Does that make it bad or anything? Obviously not, it's just that it was a disappointing outcome considering how big ASIB was. Because ASIB and GAGA have little to no crossover appeal in brand value. From a label perspective you can clearly see how the GAGA brand wasn't positively impacted outside of more casual fans attending shows. Bloody Mary was a meme and was more impactful to Gaga's overall brand perception (in a good way) for the younger generation of listeners than a large portion of Chromatica was no tea. For a label that is focused on making money from MUSIC and not other ventures that Gaga does, I can see why they would think that Chromatica was a dissapointment, especially with the amount of investment on promotion and brand deals they had going into the era that didn't get to see the light of day bc of Covid. I can see what you're getting at but at the end of the day, MOST of her discography got massive boosts in streams after ASIB dropped 1
GraceRandolph Posted February 10 Posted February 10 Just now, dawnettakins said: Obviously. But they're acting like it tanked her brand or somehow didn't improve it at all. It did. But due to her and her team dropping the ball after release, yea the longevity wise is super disappointing. Should have been better. Yeah, but we’ve all talked about how Chromatica era was underwhelming after ASIB era. It’s not offensive to say.
Sheep Posted February 10 Posted February 10 Chromatica stopped the trend of big declines album to album but let's not pretend she wasn't aiming for something much bigger than just stemming the bleeding when she booked Ariana Grande at her peak and put out a house pop album when all she wanted to write was sad ballads. 1
Recommended Posts