Yes, AND Posted Thursday at 10:01 PM Posted Thursday at 10:01 PM 5 minutes ago, Sannie said: i've never seen a fanbase so excited for proof their fave is a legacy act. if you're going to brag about spotify stats, at least ensure said stats aren't from 10-year-old songs being streamed. like, i don't think anyone disagrees katy has a good catalog? her problem has always been getting people to care about her now in 2025. are kats actually convinced this tour is doing well because people around the area are buying last-minute $20 tickets? to be fair, though, gaga repeaked because of NEW music, not because of her catalog. there's a big difference between being a relevant current act and a legacy act. You trying to convince yourself the tour is not doing well is so try hard. Give it up hater.
Walk_Away21 Posted Friday at 01:41 AM Posted Friday at 01:41 AM 7 hours ago, OrgVisual said: 6 mil omg!?
Smarticle Posted Friday at 01:45 AM Posted Friday at 01:45 AM cause even bad exposure is exposure at the end of the day
babyforlife Posted Friday at 02:15 AM Posted Friday at 02:15 AM Congrats Katy! Touring impact, which is hard to get not everyone can get that 4
Starchild Posted Friday at 02:51 AM Posted Friday at 02:51 AM 8 hours ago, motra_gaga said: Y'all been saying this since Witness almost a decade ago… OT: was just listening to Wide Awake. She ate this one thing
Starchild Posted Friday at 02:51 AM Posted Friday at 02:51 AM (edited) . Edited Friday at 02:52 AM by Starchild
Starchild Posted Friday at 02:51 AM Posted Friday at 02:51 AM (edited) We can't hide dp anymore? Edited Friday at 02:52 AM by Starchild
Badgalbriel Posted Friday at 02:56 AM Posted Friday at 02:56 AM 8 hours ago, charot said: It's a valid metric though. More monthly listeners means more unique listeners. It's completely invalid. Monthly listeners just means people that listened to you in a given month. It doesn't matter if it was a random song in a Playlist or if they decided to listen to a whole album. Streaming numbers is the only valid metric. 1
nky0411 Posted Friday at 07:25 AM Posted Friday at 07:25 AM While im happy for Katy for the resurgeance of genuine interest for her music (not her drama), at same time i also cannot at some of you that denied Gaga's peak in ML few weeks ago. EW the double standards
Wewee Posted Friday at 08:41 AM Posted Friday at 08:41 AM A nostalgia act She is really good for a throwback 1
Maleficent Posted Friday at 01:50 PM Posted Friday at 01:50 PM 19 hours ago, penguintim said: Au contraire, my little lanalligator kworb has 1432 at 225,989,901 streams, and according to the wayback machine, this time last month it was at 214,291,936 streams 225,989,901 - 214,291,936 = 11.697.965 streams for 1432 in the past month Katy Perry has 65,733,805 monthly listeners there's a lot to take away from that Don't bring facts and figures into places they're not wanted! I come here to escape that kind of thing. 1
Maroonx Posted Friday at 02:33 PM Posted Friday at 02:33 PM 16 hours ago, Sannie said: are kats actually convinced this tour is doing well because people around the area are buying last-minute $20 tickets? literally she sold most of the tickets for the Minneapolis show because of that. Tickets were almost free and she still didn't sell all of them
Phaunzie Posted Friday at 02:40 PM Posted Friday at 02:40 PM 11 hours ago, Badgalbriel said: It's completely invalid. Monthly listeners just means people that listened to you in a given month. It doesn't matter if it was a random song in a Playlist or if they decided to listen to a whole album. Streaming numbers is the only valid metric. Not is not how monthly listener's work. Monthly listeners are unique users i.e individuals (1 monthly listener) who stream your music at least once in a 28-day window. This means, the metric doesn't increase not matter how often you play the music. No matter the source, they still listened to the music. So, it is valid.
Badgalbriel Posted Friday at 02:43 PM Posted Friday at 02:43 PM 2 minutes ago, Phaunzie said: Not is not how monthly listener's work. Monthly listeners are unique users i.e individuals (1 monthly listener) who stream your music at least once in a 28-day window. This means, the metric doesn't increase not matter how often you play the music. No matter the source, they still listened to the music. So, it is valid. That's exactly what I said. No matter if you listen to it once or multiple times, it's only one count. Streaming numbers is the only thing that matters.
Infernal Paradise Posted Friday at 02:50 PM Posted Friday at 02:50 PM Amazing. KP7 is coming to shut OKHs up. 2
UnusualBoy Posted Friday at 03:24 PM Posted Friday at 03:24 PM The amount of salty people in this thread 3
halcyonday Posted Friday at 03:42 PM Author Posted Friday at 03:42 PM 1 hour ago, Maroonx said: literally she sold most of the tickets for the Minneapolis show because of that. Tickets were almost free and she still didn't sell all of them Cope! Y'all were sure no one would go and they would cancel but y'all keep losing 4
MainB Posted Friday at 05:25 PM Posted Friday at 05:25 PM Fabulous for a throwback and throwback only afterall
Genius2 Posted yesterday at 01:30 AM Posted yesterday at 01:30 AM On 5/15/2025 at 3:17 PM, Sugar-Rush said: "Repeak"? I guess being among the Top 10 females is a victory in itself, but the fact that her career high is only one spot higher now despite her massive tour is just Massive tour? But their haters said their tour was a total flop. Should they decide if it's a flop or massive? 2
Recommended Posts