Jump to content

Muni Long reveals the truth behind Timber's vocals and writing credits


Recommended Posts

Posted

Hm…. Idk. Not to discredit either artist but I suppose it's possible that maybe she was brought in to work on some of the harmonies? There's a couple that are higher and might be difficult to consistently get correct. It's also possible that Kesha was sick or something was going on vocally at that moment with her. 

  • Like 1

  • Replies 100
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • bearman

    8

  • dumbsparce

    7

  • Namie-Knowles

    6

  • professor2000

    4

Posted

No eyebrows AND no solo hits to her name? She should pick a struggle before coming for anyone. 

  • Thanks 2
  • Confused 1
  • Thumbs Down 42
Posted
11 minutes ago, gettsleazy said:

No eyebrows AND no solo hits to her name? She should pick a struggle before coming for anyone. 

Lowkey glad to officially know that Kesha had no involvement in one of her worst singles 

 

:suburban:

  • Haha 1
Posted
1 minute ago, bearman said:

Lowkey glad to officially know that Kesha had no involvement in one of her worst singles 

 

:suburban:

Dnnnngnngnnf right like what does this girl think she's doing? You wrote "WhoaaaaOhhhOhhhhOhhh" over a 4 bar beat and we're supposed to care? 

  • Haha 3
  • Confused 1
Posted

this girl does not support other women

 

ezgif-7-1224e65a9cc1.thumb.gif.964bd2f22

  • Thanks 1
Posted
2 hours ago, vanishingbee said:

Am I wrong in thinking that it doesn't make sense that Kesha couldn't hit the notes? We've heard Praying, she's got the range. 

I took it that she couldn't get the right feel…not necessarily about hitting the note.  I think that was just a colloquial expression.

 

Hmmm @ the publishing piece.  yeah, that part is definitely messed up.  AND not paying her at all for backing vocals. 

 

Someone said they probably change the "whoa" to "woo" to justify the 2% publishing. :skull: 

  • Thanks 1
Posted (edited)
14 minutes ago, professor2000 said:

Someone said they probably change the "whoa" to "woo" to justify the 2% publishing. :skull: 

Isn't this the norm though? Some artist have been credited for far less contributions. Pebe asked 2% from Luke's cut not Muni anyway so it wasn't going to affect her. 

 

(Luke who has not worked on the song at all and got probably payed more than Muni will ever get payed as a songwriter, this is where her rage should be addressed not falsely dragging another artist for her vocals and an imaginary Atlantic Records A&R that is somehow working for Sony. You should know better with Luke magically appearing on Planet Her songs 4 years after release) 

Edited by bearman
  • Like 1
Posted

I just wish she hadn't targeted Kesha and her mom who are probably the least amount of the problem in this scenario. Unnecessary 

  • Like 5
  • Thanks 3
  • Thumbs Down 2
Posted
3 minutes ago, bearman said:

Isn't this the norm though? Some artist have been credited for far less contributions. Pebe asked 2% from Luke's cut not Muni anyway so it wasn't going to affect her. 

 

(Luke who has not worked on the song at all and got probably payed more than Muni will ever get payed as a songwriter, this is where her rage should be addressed not falsely dragging another artist for her vocals. You should know better with Luke magically appearing on Planet Hear songs 4 years after release) 

How is she falsely dragging another artist?  She specifically said the smoke was for Atlantic Records…?

 

She didn't disparage her singing. She just giving context why her vocals were on the song in the first place.  

 

And changing "Whoa" to "woo" is not songwriting.  It's wrong, regardless of who does it.  
 

 

  • Like 5
Posted
1 minute ago, professor2000 said:

How is she falsely dragging another artist?  She specifically said the smoke was for Atlantic Records…?

 

She didn't disparage her singing. She just giving context why her vocals were on the song in the first place.  

 

And changing "Whoa" to "woo" is not songwriting.  It's wrong, regardless of who does it.  
 

 

You can easily listen to the acapella and stems and it's all Kesha so yes she's falsely dragging another artist. Her vocals are simply not on the song. 

 

Also why is Atlantic Records involved on a song that is owned by Sony? Neither Kesha, Pitbull or her at the time were signed to Warner Music. There's just a lot of weird things about what she's saying.

 

We all know the industry is ruthless and unfair but in this case I don't know what she's complaining about. She got credited, she got payed and it's all good. Pebe dropped her 2% claim when Luke blackmailed her by threatening to withdraw royalties payments to everyone involved and in the end Kesha was not payed for this song at all (or anything she has released pre-2014). 

 

 

  • Like 6
  • Confused 1
  • Thumbs Down 1
Posted
2 hours ago, bearman said:

Here are the raw Kesha vocals from the recording session by the way. I understand where Priscilla is coming from but this story in particular has a lot of holes. She wrote a song and got rightfully credited for it. The Pebe v Luke dispute is much deeper than this and anyway neither her or Kesha got payed for Timber in the end. 

 

 

Pitbull's vocals I CAN'T :chick2:

  • Haha 4
Posted

first of all shut up money long

  • Thanks 1
  • Thumbs Down 4
Posted
Just now, TheBoss said:

Pitbull's vocals I CAN'T :chick2:

I miss him/his music so much though. Simpler times. 

Posted

A woman couldn't "hit notes" while forced to work with her abuser and battling an ED? Shocking. WE know she can sing when she feels comfortable. Like get your head around what stress does to you and I damn know what they were yellling to her whenever she "failed" in the studio. Disgusting rats

  • Like 4
Posted

Sure it's unfair to bring this convo up when Kesha can't respond or talk about this directly due to legal restraints but idk why fans are gunning for Muni like this when all of the hate is towards the music industry which is notorious for doing shady things like this... she probably has a million stories like this but this probably wasn't the right one to broadcast due to how complicated the circumstances are with the aforementioned people involved. idk.  

Posted

Muni has kind of discussed this several times, there's a great podcast interview she did with Ross Golan (under Priscilla Renea) discussing songwriting and the creation of this song. She's def in the wrong for shading Kesha, especially since Kesha's vocals are so prominent in the song and Muni's background vocals are tucked way underneath. But most of her points are extremely valid and Kesha and her mom aren't the point in her critiques.

 

But in general, I think it's pretty shitty when artists take songwriting credit if they change a melody or change a couple of words in a song. This definitely seems like one of those situations, but different perspectives can coexist. Kesha was under extreme duress during this time, and claiming songwriting credits along with her mother was obviously their way to reclaim some fairness under Kesha's recording deal. Unfortunately, royalties disputes affects all songwriters involved, so I do think it's valid for Muni to be upset at all parties over this.

Posted
4 hours ago, JBJT2786 said:

Baby she had a  decent hit with Made for Me which came out this year and is Platinum.....like... :biblio:

arguably bigger than hrs too.

  • Like 6
  • Thanks 1
Posted (edited)
3 hours ago, bearman said:

You can easily listen to the acapella and stems and it's all Kesha so yes she's falsely dragging another artist. Her vocals are simply not on the song. 

 

Also why is Atlantic Records involved on a song that is owned by Sony? Neither Kesha, Pitbull or her at the time were signed to Warner Music. There's just a lot of weird things about what she's saying.

 

We all know the industry is ruthless and unfair but in this case I don't know what she's complaining about. She got credited, she got payed and it's all good. Pebe dropped her 2% claim when Luke blackmailed her by threatening to withdraw royalties payments to everyone involved and in the end Kesha was not payed for this song at all (or anything she has released pre-2014). 

 

 

Song was originally FloRida's and he's signed to Atlantic.  The names she dropped are legit ppl (I interned there), so I doubt she's making it up.  
 

It's possible when Atlantic had it, she was indeed asked to be on it.  And maybe she didn't get paid b/c it was lost in the shuffle she was involved (outside of being a writer) when it transitioned to Pitbull/RCA? Or hell, maybe they actually took her off when RCA got it + she didn't realize.  
 

And her point in bringing this up was a part of series of how Atlantic has treated her (ie, how they mistreat Black artists)….which the point still stands b/c she said she gets 2-5K to even show up to do bg vocals.  And this is 1 of 3 things they have done to her along these lines.   
 

And the 2% pub is still wrong either way, if you were not involved in writing the track…no matter how you slice it. Dropped or not. But idk…we can agree to disagree.  
 

 

 

Edited by professor2000
  • Like 3
Posted

I've always wondered why the music indstury still seems so closely guarded. The creation of these songs and albums. It's still mostly hidden behind a big curtain. I think things like this are why. There's just way too much shady stuff going on. No one wants to talk about it.

  • Like 1
Posted
29 minutes ago, professor2000 said:

It's possible when Atlantic had it, she was indeed asked to be on it.  And maybe she didn't get paid b/c it was lost in the shuffle she was involved (outside of being a writer) when it transitioned to Pitbull/RCA? Or hell, maybe they actually took her off when RCA got it + she didn't realize.  

I think this could be the truth and maybe she's mixing things up or misremembering. Anyway, god help every female artist/creative in this industry. 

  • Like 1
Posted

yall fr weird for dragging muni here ... blame the record labels and those who are in power

  • Like 13
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.