base talk Will Gaga get a solo hit before this decade ends?

[Bubble Tea]

I just saw this thread title and 13 pages and laughed so hard

 

Gaytrl never change

[robattack332]

[Chris]

2 hours ago, Abracadabra said:

What do you mean? Explain the chart run of a song that was never a single because you're mad it has 1.5B streams? Of course it's almost 2025 and you haven't realised that peaks can be utterly meaningless. (Billie's most streamed song peaking at #64 for example). Time to catch up sis it's not 1985 anymore

 

 

I just asked you a simple question and of course you have to act like a nasty trashbag.

 

A peak is not utterly meaningless like you claim they are. So are you basically saying every single #1 single is meaningless now because they don't have 1.5 billion streams? What is the point of the Billboard Hot 100 then? That is why it is called the Hot 100. 

 

Do not sit here and try to discredit a #1 song on the Hot 100 because it does not fit the narrative that you want to display. You are basically dismissing Gaga's #1 singles with this logic in mind.

 

You are confusing a song's chart success with it's recurrent streams. Do you understand that? 

 

And don't ever f*cking say "iT's nOt 1985 aNyMoRe". Is that supposed to be a jab at Madonna or something? You are really showing your ignorance, stupidity, and immaturity. Nothing you can say or anyone else for that matter will ever diminish or take away Madonna's achievements including #1 singles. 

 

Also, you didn't answer my question on how I was having a meltdown in here. Do tell us.

[Chris]

2 hours ago, DarkGa said:

Because it's 2024 and songs go viral or grow in size later in their run, but we wouldn't expect someone born before Christ to understand.

I wouldn't expect someone who doesn't know how to properly wash their ass to understand my question, so go figure.

 

[MusicLoverDude]

Bloody Mary was a solo hit despite not being a smash. So she already got one.

[hawx23]

On 12/30/2024 at 1:17 AM, MonsterNavy said:

9.7M streams on its 135th day  😔

 

I'm just wondering the kind of stupidity one must have to see an image like this and still interpret it as "not a Gaga song". 

[Ethereaaal]

8 minutes ago, hawx23 said:

I'm just wondering the kind of stupidity one must have to see an image like this and still interpret it as "not a Gaga song". 

It's a trauma response sis. Our deranged sistrens have been through so much 

[Mariano]

9 hours ago, A Million Lights said:

Not the 2009 relic stan getting brave 

 

OT: No, she won't 

Not you talking about being brave   Y'all are famously so brave that u pretend to stan other pop girlies and not your actual fav, like that user with the Bey avi who literally used to make topics comparing Britney Spears to Christina Aguilera, to paint Britney in good light, as if any Bey stan would EVER do that   

 

 

Stop being ashamed of your real fav and be as brave as I am  

 

 

Edited December 31, 2024 by Mariano

[Kiel D-01]

3 hours ago, Chris said:

I just asked you a simple question and of course you have to act like a nasty trashbag.

 

A peak is not utterly meaningless like you claim they are. So are you basically saying every single #1 single is meaningless now because they don't have 1.5 billion streams? What is the point of the Billboard Hot 100 then? That is why it is called the Hot 100. 

 

Do not sit here and try to discredit a #1 song on the Hot 100 because it does not fit the narrative that you want to display. You are basically dismissing Gaga's #1 singles with this logic in mind.

 

You are confusing a song's chart success with it's recurrent streams. Do you understand that? 

 

And don't ever f*cking say "iT's nOt 1985 aNyMoRe". Is that supposed to be a jab at Madonna or something? You are really showing your ignorance, stupidity, and immaturity. Nothing you can say or anyone else for that matter will ever diminish or take away Madonna's achievements including #1 singles. 

 

Also, you didn't answer my question on how I was having a meltdown in here. Do tell us.

All this meltdown for nothing. The person you quoted said this:

 

Quote

you haven't realised that peaks can be utterly meaningless. 

They didn't say that all #1s/peaks are meaningless, but they CAN be meaningless.

 

 

--

 

People are so embarrassing here it's so funny. Some of you really need to go out or something.  

Edited December 31, 2024 by Kiel D-01

[sunbathinganimal]

1 hour ago, Mariano said:

 

 

 

nnnn not the OGH gallery

[Giorgoc]

I love this messy ass thread. The OGHs are obviously on their last nerve.

[Radical Pessimism]

7 hours ago, HASHTAGPOW said:

So the answer is still no?

 

omg

[lonnie]

Probably, probably not. The right song at the right moment could seal it, but even if she doesn't it shouldn't matter and doesn't outside stan bickering. 

[alfonso12]

On 12/29/2024 at 5:23 PM, fememeist said:

She has three lines on the song, and yet you Monsters want to claim ownership as a Gaga lead song when it's clearly Bruno's lead. 
 

Gaga including that little side collaboration on her album is giving Miley and Dua's Prisoner. 

The song was released under Interscope (Gaga's label), not Atlantic (Bruno's label) so no, it's not Brunos's lead, it's Gaga's. 

[Abracadabra]

5 hours ago, Chris said:

I just asked you a simple question and of course you have to act like a nasty trashbag.

 

A peak is not utterly meaningless like you claim they are. So are you basically saying every single #1 single is meaningless now because they don't have 1.5 billion streams? What is the point of the Billboard Hot 100 then? That is why it is called the Hot 100. 

 

Do not sit here and try to discredit a #1 song on the Hot 100 because it does not fit the narrative that you want to display. You are basically dismissing Gaga's #1 singles with this logic in mind.

 

You are confusing a song's chart success with it's recurrent streams. Do you understand that? 

 

And don't ever f*cking say "iT's nOt 1985 aNyMoRe". Is that supposed to be a jab at Madonna or something? You are really showing your ignorance, stupidity, and immaturity. Nothing you can say or anyone else for that matter will ever diminish or take away Madonna's achievements including #1 singles. 

 

Also, you didn't answer my question on how I was having a meltdown in here. Do tell us.

You're asking me how you are having a meltdown… how about you read back this post (and your many many others in this thread) and maybe you'll see what we all see. An unhinged mess.

 

It's so important that you learn to read properly, definitely a skill I would have thought you would have acquired by now but it's never too late. I didn't say that chart peaks are always meaningless, I said they can be meaningless. It's not our fault that your view of what makes a song a hit is  outdated and it's not our fault that being educated on this makes you so mad and frustrated.

 

And nowhere did I attack Madonna, who I am a fan of, so sit down or log out and stop embarrassing yourself.

[LewisK]

9 hours ago, Abracadabra said:

What do you mean? Explain the chart run of a song that was never a single because you're mad it has 1.5B streams? Of course it's almost 2025 and you haven't realised that peaks can be utterly meaningless. (Billie's most streamed song peaking at #64 for example). Time to catch up sis it's not 1985 anymore

 

 

There are #1 Billboard songs (a very local thing if you ask me) which barely surpass 100M streams, and we're supposed to believe those are hits and really low charting songs with BILLIONS of streams (and counting) are not. What in the hell...

 

And I'm saying that as my fave is about to get a #1, which is cool, but a really dated metric 

Edited December 31, 2024 by LewisK

[LewisK]

Btw the funniest thing is OGH are spiralling online about charts, "solos" and definitions, while the GP's perception and reality is that Lady Gaga had a popular song with Bloody Mary and has a monster hit right now (which will be seen as LG7's lead outside stan world). Meanwhile, you ask them about most of popstars and they'll be like "oh, did she release a song? I liked her in 2010".

 

That's reality, you can't twist it.

Edited December 31, 2024 by LewisK

[SweetOreosOfHeaven]

[Youngbae]

On 12/30/2024 at 1:38 AM, Giorgoc said:

Funny how a Beyonce fan is being shady when Beyonce herself had no #1 hit in 14 years. The lack of self-awareness is giving KatyKat ngl.

What is it with you Ga Ga fans and seeing Kats everywhere? Honest question.

[Giorgoc]

4 minutes ago, Youngbae said:

What is it with you Ga Ga fans and seeing Kats everywhere? Honest question.

If you followed the thread you'd see that I was proven right a few pages later.

 

They're the fanbase that lacks self-awareness the most so that person reminded me of that.

[CovalentBondage]

This thread is a mess. I hope the OGHs can fine some peace and serenity in 2025

[DarkGa]

8 hours ago, Chris said:

I wouldn't expect someone who doesn't know how to properly wash their ass to understand my question, so go figure.

 

Nurse!

 

[HarajukuPrincess]

maybe.

Edited December 31, 2024 by HarajukuPrincess

[MatiRod]

"Stupid Love" and "Bloody Mary" were both moderate hits so she already has a couple...

[Yes, AND]

16 hours ago, Chris said:

 

 

Do not sit here and try to discredit a #1 song on the Hot 100 because it does not fit the narrative that you want to display. You are basically dismissing Gaga's #1 singles with this logic in mind.

 

You are confusing a song's chart success with it's recurrent streams. Do you understand that? 

 

 

This. 

 

The gurls think free spotify streams are the only thing that measure success now. So silly. 

 

Chart success when something was released and how it performed on the charts is completely different to that.