Yes, AND Posted Thursday at 01:45 AM Posted Thursday at 01:45 AM 4 hours ago, BadHabits said: Pink or Beyonce would've been the only other choices. I can't at people saying Billie like she has the same voice as Gaga. No one said that. Billie has a much more pleasant tone. 2 4
BrattyBottom Posted Thursday at 02:00 AM Posted Thursday at 02:00 AM 32 minutes ago, nhatpb said: in y'all dream cause it never happen. It is and always Gaga's song It's Gaga's song because she was chosen to be on it I'm simply stating that there's several other artists that could have made it a huge collaboration if Bruno decided to choose them instead. 1
dumbsparce Posted Thursday at 03:21 AM Posted Thursday at 03:21 AM Gaga adds nothing to the song. In fact, she almost ruins it for me bc of how unbearable her vocals are in ballads. A solo Bruno version would be ideal but if he had to add a female feat I guess Adele would be the best option. 3 5
Ethereaaal Posted Thursday at 05:08 AM Posted Thursday at 05:08 AM I love how ATRL is ignoring the fact that such other female singer should actually be able to sing the song better or the same as Gaga. Take that into account, and you dont have a lot of other female artists left… xoxo, Joanne! 1
Titanbaddie Posted Thursday at 06:34 AM Posted Thursday at 06:34 AM There are girl who for sure would've made it a huge hit as well... Beyonce, Ariana, Rihanna, Taylor, Adele etc
UrMom Posted Thursday at 06:59 PM Posted Thursday at 06:59 PM I would LOVE a Bey version. Any AI covers out there?
Mariano Posted Thursday at 07:06 PM Posted Thursday at 07:06 PM 15 hours ago, dumbsparce said: Gaga adds nothing to the song. In fact, she almost ruins it for me bc of how unbearable her vocals are in ballads. A solo Bruno version would be ideal but if he had to add a female feat I guess Adele would be the best option. You're right, Gaga is the reason the song bombed hard cuz of her nasty voice!!! Oh wait.. Clown.
dumbsparce Posted Thursday at 07:13 PM Posted Thursday at 07:13 PM 7 minutes ago, Mariano said: You're right, Gaga is the reason the song bombed hard cuz of her nasty voice!!! Oh wait.. Clown. 1 1
Mariano Posted Thursday at 07:54 PM Posted Thursday at 07:54 PM 39 minutes ago, dumbsparce said: I didn't ask u to post ur selfie, but cute!
IVY Posted Thursday at 10:35 PM Posted Thursday at 10:35 PM Bruno only had Gaga in his mind for this song. It is obvious he likes Gaga as an artist and as a person too. The thing is Bruno might have wanted this to serve as the soundtrack for the Joker film, but Gaga has already done a soundtrack album for the joker. So they decided to release it as a stand alone single which most thought was weird since it would have worked so good for the film considering its lyrics.
dumbsparce Posted Friday at 12:45 AM Posted Friday at 12:45 AM 4 hours ago, Mariano said: I didn't ask u to post ur selfie, but cute! Babe that's clearly you. I said "her voice almost ruins the song FOR ME" aka a subjective take on its quality and you replied "that's why it bombed" aka an objective take on its commercial performance. Where's the connection? No amount of heart emojis can mask your wrinkly face
HarajukuPrincess Posted Friday at 12:54 AM Posted Friday at 12:54 AM On 12/29/2024 at 6:10 AM, gr33dy4Ari said: Imagine if it were Ariana! The high notes will sound better and more audible! No seriously, it would have been a multi-week number one debut, a la 7 TU,N and 7R
popularmoonlight Posted Friday at 03:20 AM Posted Friday at 03:20 AM On 12/30/2024 at 3:41 PM, Mast said: Y'all keep saying "Bruno's Label" when the song was released under Interscope, which means that Gaga's label is probably doing the bulk of promotion. where's the promotion for disease then
Recommended Posts