QueenBeyoncé Posted November 7 Posted November 7 25 minutes ago, PoisonPill said: Keep shouting that into the ether as your side loses elections for the next 20 years At you thinking voting Trump is the winning side, their run to Dems to clean up Republicans mess like always
50thStateofMind Posted November 7 Posted November 7 8 hours ago, Thesedays said: Stanning a political candidate that lost every single swing state and suffered the worst Dem defeat in 20 years. No wonder liberals lose so badly if they can't do basic analysis, only celeb worshipping. Yes, Kamala, as a black woman, obviously paid a price for the racism in the US society. At the same time, she also obviously pandered to that racism and white supremacy by rising in the political world as a "tough on crime" AG then a establishment-beloved senator then a political candidate coddled by the donor class and billionaire. The same white supremacy and racism that did harm her campaign to an extent is something she embraced to personally become a very successful woman who is part of the political establishment. On one hand, kudos to her. On the other, ignoring all that so you can celeb worship her and reject any analysis on her failed campaign is extremely dumb. Are you a right-wing infiltrator doing your part to enshrine the right as the de facto working class multiracial party? If you're not, wake the **** up. "Stanning" a politician?? Yeah…you're an absolute joke. also, anyone who can't acknowledge that she was a much better candidate is 100% unserious or a deluded Trumper. 1 1
Thesedays Posted November 7 Posted November 7 (edited) 24 minutes ago, 50thStateofMind said: "Stanning" a politician?? Yeah…you're an absolute joke. also, anyone who can't acknowledge that she was a much better candidate is 100% unserious or a deluded Trumper. I love that you think I am unserious for pointing out you are using stan logic to defend politicians. Yet, you are deeply serious when you say there's nothing to blame on a candidate that failed on winning any swing state and had the worst Dem defeat in two decades despite literally spending $1 billion in her campaign. Which is literal stan logic. Also, being behind a genocide does not "a much better candidate" make. Just because you can overlook it doesn't mean everyone else can. Edited November 7 by Thesedays 6 1
Thesedays Posted November 7 Posted November 7 1 hour ago, QueenBeyoncé said: At you thinking voting Trump is the winning side, their run to Dems to clean up Republicans mess like always who running to the Dems? Dems have been hemorrhaging minority support since 2016. Keep ignoring the writing on the wall and soon enough the Republicans will be more multiracial than the Dem Party. 2
Mr.X Posted November 7 Posted November 7 20 hours ago, Communion said: He's ******* right and this has been the issue with Democrats for at least the last decade. People want change, but the democrats only favour the status quo. They deserved to loose
QueenBeyoncé Posted November 7 Posted November 7 59 minutes ago, Thesedays said: who running to the Dems? Dems have been hemorrhaging minority support since 2016. Keep ignoring the writing on the wall and soon enough the Republicans will be more multiracial than the Dem Party. This is YT ppl's fault. The Black working class got message 1
50thStateofMind Posted November 7 Posted November 7 1 hour ago, Thesedays said: I love that you think I am unserious for pointing out you are using stan logic to defend politicians. Yet, you are deeply serious when you say there's nothing to blame on a candidate that failed on winning any swing state and had the worst Dem defeat in two decades despite literally spending $1 billion in her campaign. Which is literal stan logic. Also, being behind a genocide does not "a much better candidate" make. Just because you can overlook it doesn't mean everyone else can. Yup you are 100% unserious. I never said ANY of the things you claim. "Stan logic" do you even turn your brain on before typing out this nonsense? 1 2
Thesedays Posted November 7 Posted November 7 40 minutes ago, QueenBeyoncé said: This is YT ppl's fault. The Black working class got message It's white people's fault that POC are leaving the Dem Party in droves? lol Also, black turn-out was terrible and there was a swing among black voters in crucial states. 3
Disconnect Posted November 7 Posted November 7 He's alrways been so intelligent. IDK why he's never been the democratic candidate .
superglowy Posted November 7 Posted November 7 36 minutes ago, CBC said: Bernie president, AOC VP 2028 I can see the vision The man would be 87 and would need to hit 91 to complete his term. AOC 2028. Bernie can cheerlead.
Katamari Posted November 7 Posted November 7 45 minutes ago, CBC said: Bernie president, AOC VP 2028 I can see the vision Nah AOC 2028 1
byzantium Posted November 7 Posted November 7 1 hour ago, QueenBeyoncé said: This is YT ppl's fault. The Black working class got message And what are you planning on doing about that?
Thesedays Posted November 7 Posted November 7 29 minutes ago, Katamari said: Nah AOC 2028 no way AOC would appeal to anyone except loyalist Dems after years of entrenching herself to the party and being up on that stage saying Kamala was working tirelessly on a caesefire. Sanders was also doing similar clownery but at least he had decades of work being a legit independent to show up for. AOC was calling Nancy Pelosi "mama bear" 2 years in. 2 1
Mtjjproducer Posted November 7 Posted November 7 2 hours ago, Katamari said: Nah AOC 2028 BSFFR if u think she has a chance in hell at being president. Her being the nominee would be a worse landslide than both Clinton and Harris.
GraceRandolph Posted November 8 Posted November 8 Atp if you don't see Democratic Party leadership as culpable for Trumpism at least in part then you are part of the problem. 4
AMIT Posted November 8 Posted November 8 9 hours ago, Disconnect said: He's alrways been so intelligent. IDK why he's never been the democratic candidate . Literally because the establishment would never let him. The state is NOT meant to work for ''the people''. Does the state ask you if you please want to pay it taxes? No. Does it punish you if you don't? Yes. These political parties are just distraction. The state will keep doing whatever it takes to protect the owner class from the working class. In the end, things get worse and worse just like we are seeing it now and how it's always been when it comes to the state being in power. People need to wake up already. 1
Hex Posted November 8 Posted November 8 14 hours ago, Jude said: He's definitely running in the next election. He would be 87 bffr 2
Capris Groove Posted November 8 Posted November 8 A 90 year old Bernie Sanders running around the world going to UN meetings. Next!
modeblock Posted November 11 Posted November 11 who would have thought no one cared about protecting their cryptocurrency assets? dem policy consultants you are NOT seeing heaven
Kahlo Posted November 11 Posted November 11 (edited) And so are the MAGA republicans. They're corrupt. It's just that trump is so insane his voters think he's anti establishment. Don't be fooled. And I agree with Bernie, but he should have said this last year. The democrats need a populist (I hope the dems will never push AOC to the front. She comes across as very pedantic) Edited November 11 by Kahlo
Recommended Posts