Jump to content

Rumor: Gaga "in shock" at J:FAD flopping; Tarantino to save her?


Recommended Posts

Posted
7 hours ago, Digitalism said:

Now wanting to act in a movie with no scrip or plot or anything makes no sense. She wants her name to be asociated with Tarantino that's it

Tarantino has already worked with Gaga by giving her the ***** Wagon for Telephone, and she has filmed two Robert Rodriguez films. She wants to work with esteemed directors like all actresses, and she has the Oscar nomination and name recognition to land roles. Deal with it.

  • Like 3
  • Haha 1
  • Confused 1

  • Replies 174
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • needs

    7

  • Sheep

    5

  • TheFireLexus

    4

  • Rep2000

    3

Posted

What do most of you know about movies, awards, directors, etc? 

When the latter have been saying NO to your faves for years dd

 

Khal

Posted

:ahh:

Posted
13 hours ago, Sannie said:

Do people think actors who don't write, direct, or produce the movies they star in are somehow devastated when the movies they're in flop? :rip: They're not paid to make the movie a success, they're paid to play a character. They do that and then they move on. Why do people think actors become, like, attached to movies in a personal way? It's a job for them.

in what universe would an actor not care about a project they signed on to willingly and spent many months working on? if she didn't care she wouldn't have made a seperate album on top of it either.

 

i'm sorry but you're coping :rip:

  • Haha 2
Posted
20 hours ago, Thin White Duke said:

Gaga's new header portfolio pic:

 

spacer.png

 

#ThankYouTarantino

:bibliahh:

Posted (edited)

:deadbanana:
 

if someone told me this is how things would turn out a month ago when that notorious hate train was happening, I would have not believe ya, oh my lanta 

Edited by Breathe On Moi
Posted

Well

 

hip-hop-rap.gif

 

Posted

was her acting bad or is she being crucified because of her association with a **** film?

Posted
3 minutes ago, fulgadrum said:

was her acting bad or is she being crucified because of her association with a **** film?

I haven't seen it, but apparently Gaga is the highlight of the film according to critics. She's not a lead either, so she can't really be blamed for how bad the movie is, and it's unfair that OGHs and apparently Todd Phillips and WBs are trying to scapegoat her. 
 

anyway, one flop doesn't mean Gaga's acting career is over. Many Hollywood stars have flopped tremendously, but actors have a much easier time bouncing back. She and her team just need to be wiser when it comes to selecting scripts. 

  • Like 1
Posted
1 hour ago, velocity said:

in what universe would an actor not care about a project they signed on to willingly and spent many months working on? if she didn't care she wouldn't have made a seperate album on top of it either.

 

i'm sorry but you're coping :rip:

Not really. I mean they obviously all care but it's not as personal or impactful to their career as an album is to a singer and they've all mostly moved on to the next project by they time they have to promote an earlier movie so no, actors are not that attached to the movies they film. They just move from job to job like the set dresser and editor. Movies are a directors medium.

Posted
20 hours ago, Grizzo said:

is the daily mail reliable because it sounds like a fan fiction 

This sentence is actually a rarity as "Daily Mail" and "reliable" are hardly ever found in the same sentence :dies:

Posted (edited)

anyone would work with gagar, she has 3 acclaimed movie roles and a best actress golden globe for a TV show.

only in OGHs delulu mind she is not a serious actress and studio execs wouldn't want her or whatever, they said the same stuff after HOG reviews which she then immediately got booked for this massive opportunity which turned out to be a stinker because of the Hangover director.

she now only needs to work with a bulletproof director like tarantino or nolan, or do a smaller more focused indie/artsy project where she can be fully utilized. 

but i can already tell if she goes for the latter OGHs will be making threads like "Gaga can't book big projects anymore, surprised?"

:clack:

Edited by RideOrDie
  • Like 1
  • Confused 1
  • Thumbs Down 1
Posted
15 hours ago, CoolNebraskaGuy said:

The number of Katy cats (hiding behind other artists, I might add) pretending they knew JFAD was going to bomb. :laugh:
 

Everyone thought this was going to be huge until the Venice film fest. You don't need to pretend, we all know y'all aren't that smart! 
 

This is on Phillips and WB. WB has a history of butchering films in post production and Todd basically committed fraud with the amount of false advertising around this movie. Pretty much all the scenes they used to create buzz weren't even in the film
 


 

 

 

 

Anyone with eyes knew that it was going to flop. It was reported very early on that Lady Gaga would be starring in the movie.

  • Like 3
  • Haha 1
  • Thumbs Down 1
Posted
1 minute ago, RideOrDie said:

anyone would work with gagar, she has 3 acclaimed movie roles and a best actress golden globe for a TV show.

only in OGHs delulu mind she is not a serious actress and studio execs wouldn't want her or whatever, they said the same stuff after HOG reviews which she then immediately got booked for this massive opportunity which turned out to be a stinker because of the Hangover director.

she now only needs to work with a bulletproof director like tarantino or nolan, or do a smaller more focused indie/artsy project where she can be fully utilized. 

but i can already tell if she goes for the latter OGHs will be making threads like "Gaga can't book big projects anymore, surprised?"

:clack:

Only the star of one of the least successful movies of all time. :clap3:

 

Fr tho she's cooked. Acting career is over. 

  • Like 3
  • Thumbs Down 1
Posted

I don't see why she should be deterred from other movie roles. It's pretty widely accepted that her performance wasn't what people disliked about Folie à Deux, in fact a lot of people saying she was under utilised and a wasted talent.

 

I can see her in a Tarantino film, I'd be on board with that.

  • Thanks 1
Posted
2 minutes ago, Stunnah said:

Only the star of one of the least successful movies of all time. :clap3:

 

Fr tho she's cooked. Acting career is over. 

don't quote me kitkat, worry about your fave's ended MUSIC career

  • Thumbs Down 1
Posted

source? :matty:

Posted

textanim-t-Lc-Kx.gif

 

 

 

 

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
  • Haha 2
Posted
1 hour ago, JoJo said:

I haven't seen it, but apparently Gaga is the highlight of the film according to critics. She's not a lead either, so she can't really be blamed for how bad the movie is, and it's unfair that OGHs and apparently Todd Phillips and WBs are trying to scapegoat her. 
 

anyway, one flop doesn't mean Gaga's acting career is over. Many Hollywood stars have flopped tremendously, but actors have a much easier time bouncing back. She and her team just need to be wiser when it comes to selecting scripts. 

Literally no one is saying she is highlight of the movie or any good. As if Pheonix is not a good actor to be noted as a highlight if we're talking about acting lol

 

Noting that Gaga is more supporting than lead and saying that she had a little to do in the movie is not praising her acting lol 

  • Like 4
Posted
18 hours ago, Digitalism said:

Now wanting to act in a movie with no scrip or plot or anything makes no sense. She wants her name to be asociated with Tarantino that's it

And what about it? 99% of Hollywood would blindly sign up for what Tarantino is trying to sell as his final movie and be thrilled to play a lampshade in the background, be serious. :deadbanana2:

 

A lot of the most in demand top elite who can afford to work with an auteur every single time choses their projects based on on the creatives, their track record and reputation rather than the content because it guarantees them exposure and Lee was never gonna be in it to be a little arts not the charts indie flop character actress. It 100% makes the most sense for her to attach herself to a prestige project every other year.

 

Anyway, Lee would be a cute villain if Kill Bill Vol. 3 were to happen.

  • Confused 1
Posted
1 hour ago, Jay07 said:

Not really. I mean they obviously all care but it's not as personal or impactful to their career as an album is to a singer and they've all mostly moved on to the next project by they time they have to promote an earlier movie so no, actors are not that attached to the movies they film. They just move from job to job like the set dresser and editor. Movies are a directors medium.

I think it depends on the actor and the role, there's plenty of actors who stay attached to a character they portrayed. But even if it's just a project I can't imagine them not caring about the success of it. It reflects on them and will affect future roles. And there's no way they don't care after such a collosal bomb.

 

Also Gaga said that she created the album because she was attached to the character and wasn't done with Lee yet. That's the opposite of not being invested :michael:

Posted
29 minutes ago, ICLDXU4HS said:

And what about it? 99% of Hollywood would blindly sign up for what Tarantino is trying to sell as his final movie and be thrilled to play a lampshade in the background, be serious. :deadbanana2:

 

A lot of the most in demand top elite who can afford to work with an auteur every single time choses their projects based on on the creatives, their track record and reputation rather than the content because it guarantees them exposure and Lee was never gonna be in it to be a little arts not the charts indie flop character actress. It 100% makes the most sense for her to attach herself to a prestige project every other year.

 

Anyway, Lee would be a cute villain if Kill Bill Vol. 3 were to happen.

Todd Philips and Bradley Cooper auteurs?

Posted
59 minutes ago, RideOrDie said:

anyone would work with gagar, she has 3 acclaimed movie roles and a best actress golden globe for a TV show.

only in OGHs delulu mind she is not a serious actress and studio execs wouldn't want her or whatever, they said the same stuff after HOG reviews which she then immediately got booked for this massive opportunity which turned out to be a stinker because of the Hangover director.

she now only needs to work with a bulletproof director like tarantino or nolan, or do a smaller more focused indie/artsy project where she can be fully utilized. 

but i can already tell if she goes for the latter OGHs will be making threads like "Gaga can't book big projects anymore, surprised?"

:clack:

 

52 minutes ago, RideOrDie said:

don't quote me kitkat, worry about your fave's ended MUSIC career

ccf.gif

  • Haha 7
Posted

On a serious note, Tarantino can get any actor he wants. Why would he choose the Harlequin companion album maker? GaGa needs to get real.

  • Thanks 4
Posted
22 hours ago, shyboi said:

haelen-Joker5-212818901807-Hshsys7sg-Ga-

 

Is that caption real? :rip:

  • Haha 4
  • Thumbs Down 1
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.