Feanor Posted September 13 Posted September 13 (edited) 34 minutes ago, Doctor Dick said: You're annoying. OP posted an article. There was no reason for you to post yet another but you did it because OP's original one didn't mention Taylor as the sole factor. Except the OP pre-edit did not mention the % increase, which is explicitly what I was highlighting with my own comment. Sharing relevant information about the topic of this thread that hadn't been mentioned yet is suddenly "no reason" to leave a comment? 34 minutes ago, Doctor Dick said: Then in response to my comment you never once mentioned that it wasn't your intention to make this solely about Taylor but instead you only gave reasons as to why it is Taylor's doing that the ratings were that big. And then you started spinning it into something else because you were called out. So instead of denying it you should've said that was your initial reason. I literally told you in my very first reply to you that my comment was about the % increase: 2 hours ago, Feanor said: But kii at my comment about the percentage increase causing you to go on a rant about Taylor. There is no spinning anywhere here except from your part. My comment was never about Taylor, until you brought her up. 34 minutes ago, Doctor Dick said: I for one do not care because I give credit to all three. You claimed you did not give Taylor all the credit but you made a fool out of yourself because in your first comment to me you did exactly that - gave Taylor all the credit and discredited Sabrina and Chappell, quite literally. So congrats on saying one thing and doing another. For the millionth time, I do not write for Deadline nor is it me giving anyone a credit. Why are so bothered by someone pointing out to you that it's Deadline itself highlighting one specific name in their own article and thinking it's that users fault? Who would've thought that a simple comment praising the ratings boost would make you go on about Taylor Swift like this. Unless you want to talk to me about my original point of Deadline saying how the ratings had a 25% increase, there is literally no need to keep making this about Taylor any longer. Edited September 13 by Feanor
The Music Industry Posted September 13 Posted September 13 4 hours ago, Doctor Dick said: This doesn't mention Taylor. If you actually click on the article you linked, the first thing you see is a picture of Taylor
Frozen99 Posted September 13 Posted September 13 you argue like kids just be happy the show was finally somewhat watchable and had some great performances. meg was great.
Doctor Dick Posted September 13 Posted September 13 (edited) 16 hours ago, The Music Industry said: If you actually click on the article you linked, the first thing you see is a picture of Taylor Because she won the most coveted award? Whenever you read about award shows the biggest winner or the winner of the most coveted award is the one on the front page and in both cases it's Taylor. But it's not because she's the sole reason for the ratings and as seen by the social media numbers they eclipsed last year probably because of more star power. Edited September 13 by Doctor Dick
BrattyBottom Posted September 13 Posted September 13 Let's be real, people didn't tune in for Meg, she didn't trend whatsoever. People just returned to the program after avoiding it for the past 2 years because of Helga
Recommended Posts