Sinister Posted June 21, 2017 Posted June 21, 2017 @Fruity is right but this back and forth has me in tears
Da Barbie Posted June 21, 2017 Posted June 21, 2017 2 minutes ago, Truth Teller said: No, it's not 35% of 7.1 million is about 2.5m 7.1m + 2.5m = 9.6m Rihanna would have a 35% lead over Beyonce if her followers were 9.6 million. They're not 50% of 7.1 million is about 3.5 million 7.1m + 3.5m = 10.6m Rihanna would have a 50% lead over Beyonce if her followers were 10.6 million Rihanna's followers are 10.8 million, so Fruity is right and her lead over Beyonce is a bit over 50% Y'all will NOT have me questioning my math up in here. No ma'am. I got my degree girl. DON'T do it
Harry Posted June 21, 2017 Posted June 21, 2017 25 minutes ago, Fruity said: 10,834,020 / 7,120,518 = 1.52 52% I said lead OVER #2. tell me where ur school is so i can make sure none of my kids will study at the same place
Navyofbadgals Posted June 21, 2017 Posted June 21, 2017 @Fruity LOOK AT THE MESS U CAUSED Spoiler You're right tho but still But anyways yay for bey and rih
Stallo Posted June 21, 2017 Posted June 21, 2017 The way Rih just dominates. Amy slaying, talent. Low key scarred of what will happen now that Tays discography is there.
Mr.Marvelous Posted June 21, 2017 Posted June 21, 2017 (edited) 13 minutes ago, Lambo. said: sis.... no it's a 35% increase. 7.1m is 65% OF 10.1m again, stay in school 7.1 x 1.35 = 9.585 It really isn't sis... Edited June 21, 2017 by Mr.Marvelous
Azor Ahai Posted June 21, 2017 Posted June 21, 2017 10 minutes ago, Lambo. said: 7.1M multiplied by 35% = ~3M 7.1M + 3M = ~10M welcome to math! 7.1 multiplied by 35% is 2.5 million Bey's number is 10.9 ... You're wrong it's actually a little over 50%
Stallo Posted June 21, 2017 Posted June 21, 2017 3 minutes ago, Harry said: tell me where ur school is so i can make sure none of my kids will study at the same place .
KingB® Posted June 21, 2017 Posted June 21, 2017 11 minutes ago, sadnews said: Also, Streams are heavily driven by chart hit/radio hit single. (quote "Everybody in the business believes massive hit radio singles drive streaming." from HDD) so Beyonce having that without recent big chart hit or big radio airplay in her 20 years career into it is crazy. she's breaking the rule. It is actually so impressive
Yassin512 Posted June 21, 2017 Posted June 21, 2017 Lana slaying the top 10 and some of your faves when her last streaming hit was 5 years ago
Fruity Posted June 21, 2017 Posted June 21, 2017 1 minute ago, Harry said: tell me where ur school is so i can make sure none of my kids will study at the same place Not people still quoting me Let me simplify the numbers for y'all 3 is 50% MORE than 2 (because 2 is the implied base number) however 2 is 33% LESS than 3 (because 3 is the implied base number) Thats the argument we are having.
Cockney Cupcake Posted June 21, 2017 Posted June 21, 2017 (edited) This thread truly serving I don't know much about algebra but I knowww 1 + 1 = 2 teas Edited June 21, 2017 by Cockney Cupcake
Harry Posted June 21, 2017 Posted June 21, 2017 9 minutes ago, Truth Teller said: No, it's not 35% of 7.1 million is about 2.5m 7.1m + 2.5m = 9.6m Rihanna would have a 35% lead over Beyonce if her followers were 9.6 million. They're not 50% of 7.1 million is about 3.5 million 7.1m + 3.5m = 10.6m Rihanna would have a 50% lead over Beyonce if her followers were 10.6 million Rihanna's followers are 10.8 million, so Fruity is right and her lead over Beyonce is a bit over 50% Y'all will NOT have me questioning my math up in here. No ma'am. I got my degree girl. DON'T do it thats now how it works at 10.6m, rih lead is still 35% but the gap between hers and bey's i.e. 3.5m is 50% of what bey has. by saying "lead", a 50% is 5.3m gap between bey and rih i mean u ain't wrong but your explanation of it is incorrect.
Fenrir Posted June 21, 2017 Posted June 21, 2017 Rih & Bey 45 minutes ago, Fruity said: Rih & Bey ahead of the pack as always! Rih with a 50% lead over #2! 42 minutes ago, Fruity said: Nope. Back to school honey! dsjfkdlsfds the mess you've caused
Michael21 Posted June 21, 2017 Posted June 21, 2017 (edited) my queen Rihanna and @Fruity slaying this thread like no one. Nice to see that somenone knows math. Edited June 21, 2017 by Michael21
Harry Posted June 21, 2017 Posted June 21, 2017 (edited) 5 minutes ago, Fruity said: Not people still quoting me Let me simplify the numbers for y'all 3 is 50% MORE than 2 (because 2 is the implied base number) however 2 is 33% LESS than 3 (because 3 is the implied base number) Thats the argument we are having. dont do it honey. this is simple kworb and u being perched on it for wild thots clearly didnt help ur case Edited June 21, 2017 by Harry
Robyn. Posted June 21, 2017 Posted June 21, 2017 SCREAMING AT PEOPLE THINKING THEY WERE SCHOOLING @Fruity ONLY TO END UP BEING CLOCKED
RainDreamer Posted June 21, 2017 Posted June 21, 2017 3 minutes ago, Cockney Cupcake said: This thread truly serving I don't know much about algebra but I knowww 1 + 1 = 2 teas _____________ Whewww at all the maths lessons going on
Fruity Posted June 21, 2017 Posted June 21, 2017 2 minutes ago, Harry said: dont do it honey. this is simple kworb and u being perched on it for wild thots clearly didnt help ur case Kworb uses the #1 as the base number, however, I did not. If you are so inclined to be proved wrong then @ Kworb and if you are lucky he will explain to you that percentages (and fractions and decimals) have an inverse depending on which way you do the calculation!
Recommended Posts