Gorjesspazze9 Posted October 7 Posted October 7 37 not this doing worse then even the industry low projections.
MESSIAH13 Posted October 7 Posted October 7 2 minutes ago, Nefertiti0 said: Omg, they can't catch a break
DiabeticGrandpa Posted October 7 Posted October 7 She is the laughing stock of this month. Not only on Atrl but Ive seen so many posts on socials about this flop movie 4
Digitalism Posted October 7 Posted October 7 1 hour ago, UnusualBoy said: What I just don't get is what they spent all that budget on? 190 million is understandable in heavily CGI-reliant movies like Marvel or animated ones but in this one? They spent all that money and for what? 50 million for Gaga Joaquin and Todd Another 50+ for re shoots
Capris Groove Posted October 7 Posted October 7 I actually don't even think this will outgross Evita when adjusted for inflation. Which was a historical musical about a politician from Argentina lmao. 2
Sprawl Posted October 7 Posted October 7 It needs an ~1.75x multiplier to even cross 200M and judging by that Sunday freefall..
Popular Post Digitalism Posted October 7 Popular Post Posted October 7 2 minutes ago, DiabeticGrandpa said: She is the laughing stock of this month. Not only on Atrl but Ive seen so many posts on socials about this flop movie The monsters don't want to admit it but while katy drags were by stans only, this movie is being dragged by the GP. Gaga's brand will be actually hurt by this 16 5
Popular Post Truth Teller Posted October 7 Popular Post Posted October 7 Not lower than the lowered estimate that came after the lowered predictions that were even lower than the already lowered predictions before them 55
DiabeticGrandpa Posted October 7 Posted October 7 1 hour ago, Schhh said: "Strong start" liddos said Garden Panty ha revenge
Assassin Posted October 7 Posted October 7 even lower than the earlier reported $37.8M figure. Oh JFAD 10
Worm Posted October 7 Posted October 7 1 hour ago, Digitalism said: The monsters don't want to admit it but while katy drags were by stans only, this movie is being dragged by the GP. Gaga's brand will be actually hurt by this I don't think pointing out that Katy's comeback lacked the mainstream relevance to be dragged by the GP is really doing you any favours here 2 3
Breathe On Moi Posted October 7 Posted October 7 2 hours ago, Xtina23 said: I AM SOOO HAPPY TO SEE THIS #KARMA... Which reminds me - I need to go to tip my local psychic, she was right all along about gaga flopping #IKnowThatRight!! HAHAHAHAHHAHA I literally can't 2
Digitalism Posted October 7 Posted October 7 2 minutes ago, Worm said: I don't think pointing out that Katy's comeback lacked the mainstream relevance to be dragged by the GP is really doing you any favours here You're right it's much better to be in the most hated movie on the year. 11
Worm Posted October 7 Posted October 7 4 minutes ago, Digitalism said: You're right it's much better to be in the most hated movie on the year. I'd rather be the team that lost the Super Bowl than the one that flunked out of the minor leagues 1 1
tiagol88 Posted October 7 Posted October 7 21 hours ago, lgaga1fan said: Set pieces cost a lot. They built a lot of sets, had a lot of big props, shot on location (a full NYC courthouse, abandoned prison that was retorifttted, shutting down an entire LA street to film a chase scene). Movies cost a lot of money regardless of whether you're shooting on location or not. Actors salaries probably ranged around 70m alone. They shot on Imax. Seems like i'm not the only one wondering where those 190M went.: Quote Folie à Deux doesn't have big action set pieces. It doesn't have jaw-dropping effects. It's true that Phoenix and Gaga don't work for free, but neither of them is a film-industry megastar. And it's true that there are song and dance numbers, but these pay tribute to old musicals and TV specials, so they're not especially lavish. A detailed breakdown of where all the money went would be much more gripping to read than the film's screenplay. Source It just doesn't add up, specially when the previous movie costed like $65M.
Life Savers Posted October 7 Posted October 7 The movie categorically did not need to cost 200M dollars. If they had reigned the budget in a little bit the conversation might be different, say opening 114M on a 120M budget, but 200M is absurd. 3
fridayteenage Posted October 7 Posted October 7 On 10/5/2024 at 7:41 PM, fridayteenage said: so it would be in close competition with Renaissance for most frontloaded opening day this decade (for a $20 mil+ OW). Renaissance 53.5% OW from Friday 20/$37 million would be 54.1% 20/$38 million would be 52.6% It was 53.8 percent. She did it! 2
Popular Post Cloudy Posted October 8 Popular Post Posted October 8 The world has never seen a bomb of such proportions since the USA dropped the nuclear one. The fact that you can't keep up with how low the numbers are going to get 17
Recommended Posts