ontherocks Posted May 26 Posted May 26 (edited) 28 minutes ago, wish said: PLEASE let it be true 6 minutes ago, shyboi said: imagine Lana in something similar to YSSMIAC As long as it ain't anything lezbn I'm cool with it. We need more Christianity Edited May 26 by ontherocks
Badgalbriel Posted May 26 Posted May 26 Funny, everyone was so sure that P4K was such a prestigious and always correct magazine about 5 weeks ago. 8
selena_lavigne Posted May 26 Posted May 26 (edited) Please, Born To Die has some good songs, but let's not act like it's this world class album. Ultraviolence and NFR! are way better albums to listen in full. I used to hate BTD. This is with Lana being one of my biggest influences. Edited May 26 by selena_lavigne 2
Asscatchem Posted May 26 Posted May 26 45 minutes ago, ithinkheknowsoutsold said: You never see artists talk about the 89/90 they have on Metacritic, just one or two negative reviews. Why is that? because P4K is just THAT girl. if p4k tells me something is bad, then i will also think it's bad. 2 2
Forestboy Posted May 26 Posted May 26 He speaks the truth, but he still has some incest redfish I can't take him serious.
LoveInStereo Posted May 26 Posted May 26 41 minutes ago, talentress said: They should have just made a better album. His debut got panned because it was dreck not misunderstood. Not enough people on this site acknowledge the trainwreck that was his solo album. Makes me think the majority of people gassing up his work as a producer have never heard it. Easily in the top 10 worst albums I've ever heard, hands down
ForgottenSoul Posted May 26 Posted May 26 50 minutes ago, ithinkheknowsoutsold said: You never see artists talk about the 89/90 they have on Metacritic, just one or two negative reviews. Why is that? I mean it probs is kinda annoying that you get great reviews then someone got try to be a outliar.
Dystopian Posted May 26 Posted May 26 kind of a tone deaf comparison. hmhas still has an amazing metacritic score whereas btd was panned by everyone. 1
ericcartman Posted May 26 Posted May 26 (edited) Unbearable. If it got 8 he would be praising p4k. He sounds like a ATRL stans Edited May 26 by ericcartman 1 1
The Music Industry Posted May 27 Posted May 27 6.8 from one review and the Billie clan is having this meltdown?
More Than A Melody Posted May 27 Posted May 27 19 minutes ago, The Music Industry said: 6.8 from one review and the Billie clan is having this meltdown? Do Swifties only use dictionaries to interpret her lyrics? One comment is not a meltdown. 6 3
sway Posted May 27 Posted May 27 My biggest issue with Pitchfork is not that they take a more aggressive critical approach to their reviews. It is that they tend to publish their reviews a bit later than the rest of the publications have done so, especially for mainstream acts, to purposely be contrarian. Makes their reviews appear disingenuous to what the editors really think. That kind of calculating tactic is annoying. They fear their "indie cred" will evaporate if they give a positive score to a mainstream album they love but they know their readers hate. They for some reason appear to factor in these two things when determining scores. 3 1 1
bad guy Posted May 27 Posted May 27 Well we know Rolling Stone is bought and paid for (they gave Billie a 4/5 because she dared call them out for leaking her tracklist) and P4K will be in the ditch soon so I support Finneas wacking the contrarians
Thin White Duke Posted May 27 Posted May 27 (edited) Artists should stop being so offended by reviews, especially ones that aren't even that bad. Just do your music and enjoy it, babe. A lot of people love it, focus on that if you can't take criticism. Also, love Lana to death, but BTD is arguably quite a bloated record, however iconic. 5.5 is hardly a shockingly bad score. Edited May 27 by Thin White Duke 1
Onyxmage Posted May 27 Posted May 27 Why....does he even care? These so called "artists" pretend that they only care about the music but you know they are STUCK online looking at every review and comment.
dirrtydiana Posted May 27 Posted May 27 3 hours ago, Badgalbriel said: Funny, everyone was so sure that P4K was such a prestigious and always correct magazine about 5 weeks ago. Sometimes they get it right 🤷♀️ OT: it's true and he should say it. The fact they wait longer than other reviews to put up their biased pick me scores to lower the overall mc score. "Critics" are are obsolete in 2024.
The Music Industry Posted May 27 Posted May 27 56 minutes ago, More Than A Melody said: Do Swifties only use dictionaries to interpret her lyrics? One comment is not a meltdown. If Taylor did this, this thread would have 30 pages and you'd be calling it a meltdown. But sure! 1 2
bielneira Posted May 27 Posted May 27 It's funny how people only start talking **** about Pitchfork when them/their faves get a grade lower than expected. 'Born To Die' was really overhated tho. That album is a 7, at minimum.
Wicked Posted May 27 Posted May 27 "Nothing cool about writing a positive review of an album everyone likes" is a crazy thing to say lmfao. Everyone doesn't like the album and no music publication is obligated to give one. a 6.8 isn't even bad. 1
Bewitched Posted May 27 Posted May 27 (edited) idk if I was an up and comer just starting out I would be pissed off at negative reviews but once I'm an established artist I could give two fcks what a critic says about my music and let the charts and sales speak for themselves Edited May 27 by Bewitched
RideOrDie Posted May 27 Posted May 27 9 hours ago, ericcartman said: Unbearable. If it got 8 he would be praising p4k. He sounds like a ATRL stans billie and her brother are being hypocrites this era? that can't be...
Recommended Posts