Jump to content

Report: US rejected 2-state proposal offer by Palestinian Authority + 5 Arab nations


Recommended Posts

Posted
Quote

According to the network, the proposals in the plan included:

  • Immediate international and UN recognition of a Palestinian state.
  • Provision of full protection and funding to Palestinian refugee agency UNRWA.
  • A complete withdrawal of the IDF from Gaza within three weeks of the inception of a ceasefire.
  • Full transfer of governmental authority in Gaza to the Palestinian Authority and the entry of PA forces into Gaza with international assistance.
  • International assistance in building security mechanisms for the Palestinian Authority along with the installment of UN peacekeeping forces in Gaza, the West Bank and East Jerusalem based on a resolution to be passed by the UN Security Council.
  • Full implementation of all previous agreements between Israel and the Palestinian Authority, including deals struck in recent years in Aqaba and Sharm el-Sheikh.
  • Launching negotiations between Israel and the Palestinian Authority, to be completed within 180 days, in tandem with the release of all Palestinian prisoners from Israeli jails.
  • The transfer of Israeli authority at Gaza and West Bank border crossings to the Palestinian Authority with international supervision.
  • The convening of an international donor conference to raise funds for the Palestinian Authority.
  • The establishment of a regional security plan together with the US to ensure the security of Israel and the eventual Palestinian state.
Quote

The report said the US provided a detailed response to the proposal, effectively rejecting it entirely. Of particular concern to the US was that the plan did not mention the eradication of Hamas-

https://www.timesofisrael.com/report-us-rejected-proposed-plan-by-pa-arab-nations-for-palestinian-statehood/

  • Replies 154
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Ryan

    19

  • rihannafan

    17

  • Communion

    16

  • Delirious

    16

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted

Why the US have a say bout this? Can someone explain thank you

Posted
33 minutes ago, loml said:

Why the US have a say bout this? Can someone explain thank you

I don't know the specifics of this proposal but it looks like the UN would be involved and I think that would require the U.S. to stop vetoing every pro-Palestinian resolution.  Also, at a practical level, the U.S. is a party to this conflict.  

  • Like 2
Posted
52 minutes ago, loml said:

Why the US have a say bout this? Can someone explain thank you

The US doesn't directly have a say on the terms but acts as a mediator in the negotiations.
 

The Palestinian Authority brings their demands for a two-state solution, which the US then presents to Israel. Israel, in turn, formulates its own demands.

 

From this articles, it looks like the US doesn't think it can sell that plan to Israel.

  • Like 1
  • Thumbs Down 15
rihannafan
Posted
39 minutes ago, Kassi said:

The US doesn't directly have a say on the terms but acts as a mediator in the negotiations.
 

:ahh:

  • Like 10
  • Thanks 3
  • Thumbs Down 2
Posted
Quote

Of particular concern to the US was that the plan did not mention the eradication of Hamas-

That's fair. Eradicate the terrorist group first.

  • Like 3
  • Thumbs Down 6
  • ATRL Administrator
Posted
4 hours ago, Communion said:

Of particular concern to the US was that the plan did not mention the eradication of Hamas-

This is why content is extremely important. What’s the point of trying to sell a deal if the literal terrorist group responsible for the Palestinians being slaughtered is still in control?

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
  • Confused 4
  • Thumbs Down 4
rihannafan
Posted (edited)
3 minutes ago, Ryan said:

This is why content is extremely important. What's the point of trying to sell a deal if the literal terrorist group responsible for the Palestinians being slaughtered is still in control?

IDF will not actually be in control if the deal passes

 

Can you please bring Jjang back?

Edited by rihannafan
  • Like 13
  • Thanks 2
  • Thumbs Down 1
  • ATRL Administrator
Posted
6 minutes ago, rihannafan said:

IDF will not actually be in control if the deal passes

 

Can you please bring Jjang back?

Is Hamas not the terrorist group that started this latest conflict?

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
  • Confused 2
  • Thumbs Down 26
  • ATRL Administrator
Posted
18 minutes ago, rihannafan said:

Can you answer my question about Jjang?  There is 0 excuse for banning him that doesn't come off as insanely discriminatory.

No. I addressed this in HQ already.

  • Thanks 1
Posted

I think them not mentioning how they'll get rid of the terrorist organization that is Hamas should be addressed. 

Posted (edited)

@jjan

1 hour ago, rihannafan said:

IDF will not actually be in control if the deal passes

 

Can you please bring Jjang back?

Who's @jjang?

 

Why does their name sound so familiar

 

Edit: oop nvm it's that user lol. Good riddance

Edited by Delirious
  • Haha 3
  • Thumbs Down 14
Posted

YIKES

 

I guess America juat have to let TRUMP Win to prove a point

  • Like 1
Posted

Mess after mess. I hate this situation so much :gaycat6:

Posted (edited)

Ah yeah the typical crowd is here acting like you're not allowed to criticize anything but Israel and failure to do so means you want all Palestinians dead.  But what to expect from people who justified Hamas killing over a thousand civilians and kidnapping hundreds because "what else could they do" 

 


Israel is very clearly in the wrong the past months and so is the US for enabling it by sending aid, but that doesn't mean Hamas is not the one who initiated the 10/07 attack. So yes, people asking where the irradiation of Hamas is, is a valid question. 

 

Edited by Gaia
  • Like 4
  • Thumbs Down 1
  • ATRL Administrator
Posted
20 minutes ago, State of Grace. said:

That's the IOF, not Hamas babes

 

You claiming that you support a Free Palestine and posting this is....

Because I acknowledge that Hamas provoked this? It doesn’t negate the atrocities the IDF have committed in the past and continues to do so. Multiple things can be true at once. I don’t care if you refuse it see it that way. The terrorist attack on 10/7 was committed by Hamas. The Israeli government knew it was going to happen and did nothing to stop it, thus giving them the “rationale” to go and commit war crimes and genocide on the Palestinians. 

  • Thanks 1
Posted
5 hours ago, beautiful player said:

That's fair. Eradicate the terrorist group first.

Hamas is a resistance group against a genocidal state. The only terrorists are Israel and the USA. Long live the resistance against terrorism

  • Like 4
  • Thumbs Down 4
Posted
14 minutes ago, Gaia said:

Ah yeah the typical crowd is here acting like you're not allowed to criticize anything but Israel and failure to do so means you want all Palestinians dead.  But what to expect from people who justified Hamas killing over a thousand civilians and kidnapping hundreds because "what else could they do" 

 


Israel is very clearly in the wrong the past months and so is the US for enabling it by sending aid, but that doesn't mean Hamas is not the one who initiated the 10/07 attack. So yes, people asking where the irradiation of Hamas is, is a valid question. 

 

Israel has been wrong for 75 years babe. It forced BY BLOODSHED a state on top of an already existing native people and has continuously killed, enslaved and harrassed them ever since.

 

What Hamas did was horrible, for sure. But it is nothing compared to the terrorism of Israel. Long live Palestine and the resistance against zionism.

  • Like 6
  • Thumbs Down 2
Posted (edited)
46 minutes ago, Ryan said:

Because I acknowledge that Hamas provoked this? It doesn't negate the atrocities the IDF have committed in the past and continues to do so. Multiple things can be true at once. I don't care if you refuse it see it that way. The terrorist attack on 10/7 was committed by Hamas. The Israeli government knew it was going to happen and did nothing to stop it, thus giving them the "rationale" to go and commit war crimes and genocide on the Palestinians. 

Hamas did not provoke this when **** has been going on for 75 years. Palestinians have been murdered and ethnically cleansed for years before Oct 7th at the hands of the IOF.

 

What Hamas did was horrible, but it also was resistance violence in retaliation to decades of occupation. And it wasn't even a tiny fraction of what Palestinians have been through. 

 

Downplaying all of this to "Well Hamas provoked Israel and thus they're the responsible for the ongoing genocide" is crazy. There's only one terrorist group/state to blame and its the IOF and Israel.

Edited by State of Grace.
  • Like 11
  • Thanks 1
  • Thumbs Down 2
Posted

 

5 hours ago, Ryan said:

Is Hamas not the terrorist group that started this latest conflict?

The IDF killed 234 Palestinians in the West Bank in 2023 prior to October 7th. Settler terrorist killed an additional 9 people. At least 38 of these were children. The "conflict" has been a daily occurrence for Palestinians for decades. Just nobody cared. 

  • Like 13
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.