OrgVisual Posted March 29 Posted March 29 1 hour ago, Green said: I don't get it It did 1.6 million in 8 hours (first day) and then 1.7 million in 24 hours (second day) I guess it was very frontloaded People were curious then never listen to it again 5
Mezter Posted March 29 Posted March 29 (edited) 2 hours ago, Nefertiti0 said: US #31 764,788 The girls got confident on that last page Edited March 29 by Mezter 1 10
_Fey Posted March 29 Posted March 29 1 hour ago, Green said: I don't get it It did 1.6 million in 8 hours (first day) and then 1.7 million in 24 hours (second day) I guess it was very frontloaded It did 1.6m unfiltered streams. A LOT of that must have been filtered out, because 1.6m should have been enough to debut on the global chart, but it didn't. That means like at least 600k of that 1.6m was filtered out. 1
By the Water Posted March 29 Posted March 29 1 hour ago, Green said: I don't get it It did 1.6 million in 8 hours (first day) and then 1.7 million in 24 hours (second day) I guess it was very frontloaded It got a lot of streams filtered yesterday though. I'd say her fans were spamming it but like what fans? Seems like her new label is up to something 1
LustSpell Posted March 29 Posted March 29 How much would this have done if it was solo? Barely over 1m?
Alak96 Posted March 29 Author Posted March 29 24 minutes ago, By the Water said: It got a lot of streams filtered yesterday though. I'd say her fans were spamming it but like what fans? Seems like her new label is up to something Maybe this had something to do with Camilizers? 3 1
Hot Volcano Posted March 29 Posted March 29 (edited) 3 hours ago, Green said: I don't get it It did 1.6 million in 8 hours (first day) and then 1.7 million in 24 hours (second day) I guess it was very frontloaded Filtered vs unfiltered. Filtered was probably something like Day 1 - 1.1m (8 hours) Day 2 - 1.7m These are obviously okay numbers. Edited March 29 by Hot Volcano 2
Mr. Duff Posted March 29 Posted March 29 The full 24 hrs number is so bad considering it had promise during its first few hours of tracking. I guess it was anticipated but rejected after being played once. To be honest it's not too bad in my opinion but I'm probably one of those that will not add it to my playlist or play it again unless I hear it outside or played by others (or on Tik Tok).
imabadkid Posted March 29 Posted March 29 just because rap is the biggest genre globally doesn't mean u can be a pop girl that's not v charismatic or captivating but think somehow your song will shoot up to #1 because u put a raper on for 45 secs in the middle of the song. its a lazy antiquated pop formula and it just does not work anymore. mizgirl needs to find a way to capture an audience and she can't do it relying on rappers to do the work for her. 1
ccfan007 Posted March 30 Posted March 30 1 hour ago, Nefertiti0 said: unfiltered(day 2): 2,373,975 | total: 4,057,449
Bethenny Frankel Posted March 30 Posted March 30 what a ******* flop, i'm so happy this racist's career is over 6 1
badgirlriri Posted March 30 Posted March 30 I mean it's obvious she had a lot of interest, but the song is bad so.
Movimento Perpétuo Posted March 30 Posted March 30 13 hours ago, Nefertiti0 said: unfiltered(day 2): 2,373,975 | total: 4,057,449 Slow down baby
drivers license Posted March 30 Posted March 30 those numbers are good for a twitter hype song, because the stan twitter hype never matches the numbers this makes Olivia's last week obsessed numbers (a deluxe track) look so big tho i don't understand why does interscope do random release days (billie & selena for example), but i guess it really won't make much difference. she'd release the same day as Bey & it would maybe just be like a 3m debut instead of 2m. anyway the song gets stuck on your head.. so like most Camila songs, it won't peak here
Recommended Posts