Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
2 minutes ago, Gaia said:

Honestly under 60M is tragic. She really did kill her reputation and appeal with the home wrecking scandal. 
 

Less than GUTS :deadbanana2:

What happened to the supposed Queen of streaming?

  • Thanks 3
  • Haha 7
  • Thumbs Down 9

  • Replies 827
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • False God

    47

  • Jude

    23

  • Blue Monday

    20

  • State of Grace.

    17

Posted

Th swifities already in here :deadbanana2:

Great numbers! Not bad for a 2019 fad :gaycat2:

  • Like 6
  • Haha 7
  • Thumbs Down 3
Posted

but I thought it would easily break Midnights record since Spotify has more users now?

  • Thanks 4
  • Haha 15
  • Confused 4
  • Thumbs Down 8
Posted

Supernatural alone deserves 10m.

  • Like 3
  • Thanks 1
Posted

A failure for homewrecker:giraffe:

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
  • Thumbs Down 5
Posted

3M more than my prediction :clap3:

Posted

I was expecting more.

Posted (edited)
3 minutes ago, jqnetto said:

tragic numbers for a tragic album from a tragic homewrecker. :clap3:

spoken by a tragic user :clap3:

Edited by Rabbit
  • Haha 13
  • Thumbs Down 1
Posted

She doesn't have a smash this time so that hurts her.

 

Good numbers. 

  • Like 1
Posted

its still good for the ex-queen of streaming :clap3::clap3:

Posted

this is ALL yes and's fault, like that song debuted with 11M meanwhile no song here could do half of what it did

terrible lead choice, basically killed all the comeback hype, and its not cause of the homewrecking thing nobody rlly cares about that

  • Like 11
  • Thanks 1
Posted
Just now, Jude said:

counter numbers, she did well!

 

 

 

The counter hasn't updated yet

Posted

To think yes, and almost did 12M :skull: .....she kinda sabotaged it with the ok lead and tragic rollout. 

  • Like 3
Posted

On par with her previous. She’s just past her streaming peak. Can’t believe the intro did more numbers than Yes, And in the US… it really slowed her momentum there

Posted
3 minutes ago, Gaia said:

Honestly under 60M is tragic. She really did kill her reputation and appeal with the home wrecking scandal. 
 

Less than GUTS :deadbanana2:

Lol if you think that. The long wait is more likely. People move on

 

Numbers are fine, interest is still there 
 

 

  • Like 1
Posted
2 minutes ago, Jude said:

with less than tracks and no smash single. An album artist!

GUTS outstreamed with 1 less track :coffee:

  • Like 5
  • Thumbs Down 7
Posted
Just now, Jude said:

counter numbers, she did well!

 

 

 

This tweet was deleted. Careful or people might realise that you’re not happy with the <60m debut!

Posted

oh this is awful! arts not the charts 🫂

  • Thumbs Down 1
Posted
4 minutes ago, ariananext said:

I don't think she cares about the Grammys

Well the Grammys don’t care about her either.

  • Haha 7
  • Confused 1
  • Thumbs Down 2
Posted

swiffers already camped out in here acting like 58m is bad 

  • Like 4
  • Haha 7
  • Thumbs Down 1
Posted

the boy is mine has potential.

  • Like 2
Posted
Just now, BadBoy said:

Well the Grammys don’t care about her either.

And?

  • Like 1
Posted
1 minute ago, ariananext said:

No serious person would think she'd do 160M or whatever Midnights did :deadbanana4: I don't know why y'all pick trolls on Twitter and pretend they represent the fanbase just because they have an Ariana pfp 

the Damage control :gaycat2:

  • Haha 1
  • Thumbs Down 4
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.