babyforlife Posted March 6 Posted March 6 turned out its for a good thing lmfao bunch of clowns here that hating her without even knowing the context such a loser 1
Dula Peep Posted March 6 Posted March 6 12 hours ago, Bojana said: which will count Mr Polansky as a trustee. ….and we have our answer
mrpartyrocker Posted March 6 Posted March 6 15 hours ago, ElectricStyle said: and when she does try to play fully into that classic gaga persona now, we end up with Chromatica, a caricature of her past self. It really felt like she was dressing up as gaga for Halloween. I'm hoping in the future, we can get a mix of both old/new gaga. A more sophisticated and monochrome era with cutting edge sexy visuals that are thought provoking and mysterious. I mean Chromatica wasn’t bad at all and it was such a fun experience overall. But defo I can tell she doesn’t enjoy being the over the top kind of popstar. I think that’s okay and she was never going to play the same cards for the rest of her career. we need to wait for her next album to understand clearly her direction and where she’s heading. If we won’t get anything close to tfm or btw, then clearly she’s never going back! 1
mrpartyrocker Posted March 6 Posted March 6 8 hours ago, 40000000000000 said: so gaga teamed up with them to announce "hey, we drained all the resources and we know you are suffering as a result, but we WILL be taking some pictures with poor people and avoiding tax charges" come up with something else other than gullibly copy+pasting this paragraph everywhere. your favorite singer is a sell-out. Drained all the resources for what? Do you think Gaga is struggling to make money? You can’t be serious hun! All singers are sellouts. From Gaga to Beyonce, Rihanna and Taylor Swift and everyone in between
Soda Pop Queen Posted March 6 Posted March 6 lol unlike most of you, I'm not gonna sit here and pretend that her playing to her wealth and elite industries is something out of left field because Stefani grew up rich (or did everyone forget about that??). It's just sad to see her passion for her musical craft leave her. Like, I understand that people's perspectives and priorities shift as they age but she let herself get too boring when she's only 37 her new image/brand is something a pop girl does in their 50s and beyond, not while they're still young in their 30s. 3 2
Soda Pop Queen Posted March 6 Posted March 6 1 hour ago, mrpartyrocker said: Drained all the resources for what? Do you think Gaga is struggling to make money? You can’t be serious hun! All singers are sellouts. From Gaga to Beyonce, Rihanna and Taylor Swift and everyone in between I don't know if "sellout" is the right word to use for mainstream artists because vast majority of them got in the music industry with the intention to make a lot of money for their craft and to be famous for said craft. They didn't "sell out", they "bought in"... if that makes sense. 2
mrpartyrocker Posted March 6 Posted March 6 4 hours ago, Soda Pop Queen said: I don't know if "sellout" is the right word to use for mainstream artists because vast majority of them got in the music industry with the intention to make a lot of money for their craft and to be famous for said craft. They didn't "sell out", they "bought in"... if that makes sense. Sell out or bought in, that’s okay. There’s nothing wrong with it. People just need to stop hating! 2
Archetype Posted March 7 Posted March 7 On 3/5/2024 at 11:38 AM, 40000000000000 said: so gaga teamed up with them to announce "hey, we drained all the resources and we know you are suffering as a result, but we WILL be taking some pictures with poor people and avoiding tax charges" come up with something else other than gullibly copy+pasting this paragraph everywhere. your favorite singer is a sell-out. What are you even on? It's a company that makes products for people with skin conditions, what the f**k does that have to do with draining resources from people and avoiding tax charges? Are you so deluded to hate on this woman to not hear how ridiculous you sound? She's both an artist and a business woman, yes she wants to make money while also making art, makeup, whatever the hell it is and helping people at the same time. You're acting like she has personally hurt you in this endeavor, let her live
Ethereaaal Posted March 7 Posted March 7 On 3/6/2024 at 12:38 AM, 40000000000000 said: so gaga teamed up with them to announce "hey, we drained all the resources and we know you are suffering as a result, but we WILL be taking some pictures with poor people and avoiding tax charges" come up with something else other than gullibly copy+pasting this paragraph everywhere. your favorite singer is a sell-out. Are you ok? You have to be going through something to be this nihilistic… 1
Lana Banana Posted March 8 Posted March 8 On 3/4/2024 at 3:31 PM, iHype. said: I totally agree. I was thinking about this the other day. The ARTPOP backlash permanently traumatized her and you can tell she has never had a desire to be a true Pop star like she was in the early 2010s ever since. Cheek to Cheek/Joanne/A Star is eras were complete 180s, musically and to the audience she appealed to. Going from appealing to LGBT and the artsy scene to middle-aged conservatives and older sophisticates. And the biggest change by far was her overnight just ditching her love of fashion. She was known for the wacky outfits every single day in her Popstar era, and now she absolutely never cares about fashion at this point it’s so bizarre when her entire personality and presentation as an artist was tied to it severely. It really is insane to look back at early 2010s Gaga and the Gaga since. Almost as if she had some dissociative moment with her prior self and never looked back. Wait what exactly traumatized her during Artpop? I'm confused.
Raiden Posted March 8 Posted March 8 On 3/4/2024 at 1:18 PM, Tovitov said: The event was about finding a cure for Vitaligo but keep dragging Gaga I suppose That is actually precisely the problem with her. The transparent pretence. The lies, the sugarcoating. It would be better if she just openly acknowledged that being a corporate shill is her new mission and calling.
fromily Posted March 9 Posted March 9 taking that geek chic office siren corpcore trend a little too far
MatiRod Posted March 19 Posted March 19 On 3/3/2024 at 8:35 PM, Lüwís said: She's been different since 2013-2014. She does a lot these days that I just can't be bothered to pay attention to. Like this. It doesn't annoy me, I just don't care. Like, I used to check on everything she did. I think between the first jazz album and Haus Labs was launched I just stopped paying attention and turned a blind eye to a lot - apart from most of the music (except jazz). Like, I don't wear make-up, Idgaf about jazz or pharmaceuticals. She used to have a hunger, a drive to be a pop star but after Artpop she was clearly traumatised (the poor thing) and she definitely doesn't trust her fans. A pivotal moment actually might be when she performed the Sound of Music at that award show. It was clearly an attempt to tone things down and show her talent (because she is very talented) to appeal to the masses. She got a lot of praise for that performance after a couple of years of vitriolic hate and I think she wants people to be nice about her more than anything. She might even be afraid to push boundaries these days and she's got comfortable being a bit bland so she doesn't get criticism like in 2013. I don't know. I still feel bad for her sometimes. She could have been bigger than what she is now but oh well. I'll always check out new music when it comes. She was a huge part of my teenage years when I was struggling with certain things and she has a special place in my heart forever. If she's happy and succeeding financially that's great for her. No, her acting career will make her bigger than ever. Movies are the most global form of entertainment and movie stars are the biggest stars in the world. 1
Recommended Posts