Sweetestsecret Posted February 20 Share Posted February 20 (edited) 20 hours ago, Miichael said: There's literally 0% evidence that the label made her create the so-called "baby voice", and in fact Britney's book basically debunks that conspiracy theory, as she talks about being inspired by Soft Cell's Tainted Love to use more vocal fry in her tone and that she liked the way it sounded. The idea that she was somehow forced to sing like that is total nonsense She was struggling to create the baby voice live (LUCKY) And how good she was when she sang with her natural voice. (SOMETIMES opening) she had to use the baby voice for her albums cause this is why she became successful (right or wrong)... Rebellion was one of the few songs that she sang with her real voice (she uploaded it on her website back then but they never let her release the full version)... Edited February 20 by Sweetestsecret Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Miichael Posted February 20 Share Posted February 20 4 hours ago, Sweetestsecret said: She was struggling to create the baby voice live (LUCKY) And how good she was when she sang with her natural voice. (SOMETIMES opening) she had to use the baby voice for her albums cause this is why she became successful (right or wrong)... Rebellion was one of the few songs that she sang with her real voice (she uploaded it on her website back then but they never let her release the full version)... Are you confused? Where does any of that say that she was forced to use that voice by her record label? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts