Jump to content

being a black female might what stop SZA getting Grammy's AOTY?


Recommended Posts

  • ATRL Moderator
Posted
10 minutes ago, swissman said:

Is what you're saying that because she has an artistic image the Recording Academy respects, they can look past her race to take her seriously?

 

Because this is an inherent problem too, that the "image" of the musician (be it race or genre or assumed involvement) is as important to a win as the musical content, if not more. To me this seems backward, as the award is for the album (and all its contributors).

 

In SZA's case, she may have the artistic profile of Lauryn Hill, who produced all her own songs and solo-wrote all but four on her AOTY-winning album, but in actuality, SZA's album has as many as ten writers on a song, as few as three and what seems to be an average of about 5 or 6 writers per song and no production credits.

 

Please don't mistake this as any shade or disrespect to SZA who truly is an artist. I clearly value a finished work and the artist's vision more than trivia about who wrote what. I'm just stating how factors that've been used to excuse Black women losing AOTY in the past like "It's not about race, it's about writing credits" are still at play and that this shows a bias in how some Black women can be voted deserving of the top honour, but other's do not.

 

Going into statistics, white women have won AOTY 2x more in the last 15 years alone than Black women have in the entire history of the Grammys. Of course, perhaps this is due to Black women like Beyoncé, Rihanna or even Mariah not also having the "singer-songwriter" profile but there are plenty of deserving, talented, amazing Black women artists who do, they just haven't been given the recognition they deserve as per the Recording Academy's standards.

Yeah, I think it’s important to consider what the Recording Academy’s biases truly are. They are inherently a rockist organization, which ends up mapping onto race as well. Beyoncé isn’t being denied Album of the Year because she’s a Black woman, but there’s no doubt that contemporary R&B (with sampling, co-writers and an emphasis on production and performance over lyricism, for example) doesn’t fit with what the Recording Academy generally likes to reward, so she and other Black women don’t win. SZA better fits that Harry Styles/Taylor Swift/Adele mold of being a pop star who presents as a singer-songwriter. It’s not to say she’s a slam dunk, but SOS is more in the Grammy wheelhouse than Renaissance, unfortunately.

  • Like 2

  • Replies 66
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • supaspaz

    6

  • supertiffany

    6

  • Soda Pop Queen

    4

  • BlossomSoul

    3

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted
6 minutes ago, supaspaz said:

Yeah, I think it’s important to consider what the Recording Academy’s biases truly are. They are inherently a rockist organization, which ends up mapping onto race as well. Beyoncé isn’t being denied Album of the Year because she’s a Black woman, but there’s no doubt that contemporary R&B (with sampling, co-writers and an emphasis on production and performance over lyricism, for example) doesn’t fit with what the Recording Academy generally likes to reward, so she and other Black women don’t win. SZA better fits that Harry Styles/Taylor Swift/Adele mold of being a pop star who presents as a singer-songwriter. It’s not to say she’s a slam dunk, but SOS is more in the Grammy wheelhouse than Renaissance, unfortunately.

it seems that most of AOTY prefers containing songs with strong LYRICS or LYRICISM isnt it?

 

was there an AOTY has weak lyricism but great production or sound?

Posted

im also rooting for Sza or Lana to win this year.

But honesty if SOS doesnt win, i will still understand cause it is a long album with noticeable fillers and not as cohensive as album voters will normally choose.

  • ATRL Moderator
Posted
15 minutes ago, supertiffany said:

it seems that most of AOTY prefers containing songs with strong LYRICS or LYRICISM isnt it?

 

was there an AOTY has weak lyricism but great production or sound?

I guess maybe Daft Punk, but that was a decade ago. They definitely value “songwriting” first and foremost, but they have an old-fashioned idea of what “songwriting” entails.

  • Like 1
Posted

trigger me seeing this thread, like... look at beyonce team and why she got most grammy ever and endless praises from everyone, then look at one collab off grammy who is too lazy to campaign her potential best career night, get off and WORK for campaign NOW. :cool:

Posted

I mean was Bruno Mar’s album a lyrical masterpiece or just a catchy album cosplaying black art? 
 

Yes being black and a woman will affect her. She has a better chance because her music is more mainstream and the old white men that vote will tolerate it better than a Beyoncé album but they still won’t be foaming at the mouth to vote her over Taylor. She was nominated a ton in 2016 and lost every award I won’t be shocked if it happens again. 

Posted

SZA does have a lot going for her. She’s in the perfect sweet spot of critical acclaim and commercial success, with the “real artist” image and breakthrough sophomore narrative that the Grammys typically eat up. 
 

The fact that Taylor is in there with an even bigger album that is also very acclaimed could be an obstacle for her, but it also sort of sets SZA up as an underdog up against the biggest star in the world, who’s already won this award three times. It may not be as much of a hindrance as people think—it’s exhausting rooting for the antihero, but exciting to root for the underdog. 
 

Aside from that, my other worry is that her music may be seen as too vulgar or explicit to win the top prize. Sure, albums with explicit language and content have won AOTY in the past, but it’s still a pretty rare event and I don’t think any of them swore quite as much as SZA does, either. 

  • Like 1
Posted

No but that album being hot garbage might be. I’m sorry we don’t need lyrics talking about “you was balls deep” and “I just killed my ex” being awarded AOTY :rip:

  • Thumbs Down 2
Posted (edited)

Anything could happen. Voters with inclined preference for 'pop' girls might get divided between Lana, Olivia, Miley and Taylor, decimating their chances to win and increasing the chances for SZA/Janelle/boygenius/Jon to get Ed Sheeran'd from it :lakitu:

Edited by BrokenMachine
Posted

If what-her-name-that-I-cant-remember-right-now can keep collecting Grammy nominations or even SOTY with relatively no clouts, then SZA would be perfect to take over that one instead. SZA is a popular singer-songwriter and the Grammys love eating that **** up.

Posted

She better ******* win. 

  • Like 1
  • ATRL Moderator
Posted
9 minutes ago, BrokenMachine said:

Anything could happen. Voters with inclined preference for 'pop' girls might get be divided between Lana, Olivia, Miley and Taylor, decimating their chances to win and increasing the chances for SZA/Janelle/boygenius/Jon to get Ed Sheeran'd from it :lakitu:

Yeah, Boygenius is the spoiler people should be looking out for. They have the rock lane clear for themselves. It’s giving Arcade Fire.

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)

I love SOS, but it's a bit bloated. I wouldn't be mad if it won (SZA deserves), but personally I think Lana deserves more. DYKTTATUOB is a masterpiece; both sonically, thematically and lyrically.

 

If Taylor wins, Grammys are over for eternity. Nothing against Taylor, but Midnights...

Edited by mellenthin
  • Thanks 1
  • ATRL Moderator
Posted
13 minutes ago, Maxxxine said:

No but that album being hot garbage might be. I’m sorry we don’t need lyrics talking about “you was balls deep” and “I just killed my ex” being awarded AOTY :rip:

Sis, have a sense of humor. SZA does.

  • Thanks 1
Posted (edited)
3 hours ago, WildAmerican said:

i think she's got it, SOS being so genre-bending will appeal to so many different branches. 

THis.

Miley, Taylor, Olivia will votesplit

Job Batiste/Lana/Boy genius will votesplit

Janelle won't take much away from Sza's votes and she has pop appeal just like Outkast did with their win.

Edited by slw84
Posted

Serious question for ATRLers: do you guys believe we're still living in the 50s or what? Did you guys already forgot that Lauryn Hill won AOTY back in the day? Black people obviously don't have any problem winning those awards. I don't know if SZA is gonna win or not but her potential loss doesn't automatically have to be about racism.

  • Confused 1
  • Thumbs Down 1
Posted

she is the front runner in my book, taylor will get soty which will be great for her as well and lana will go home empty handed hopefully :heart:

  • Thumbs Down 2
Posted (edited)

Been telling y’all since her album release: she’s winning AOTY. And being a POC actually boosts her chances

Edited by OnlyManInTheWorld
  • Like 1
  • Confused 1
Posted
3 hours ago, houdini said:

her being a black female artist isn't really a constraint. it's the fact that she is up against Taylor that had a ridiculously successful year. unheard of year actually. and SOS is kind of a "bloated" album. one of the most important aspects of winning a grammy is cohesion. but we'll see. i do think she has a shot to win.

Well midnights and ocean Blvd are also bloated and they are her main competition 

Posted

Somewhat, tight competition too.

I dont see her winning :michael:

Posted

IF she doesn't win AOTY I will be so disappointed tbh

Posted (edited)

Now that the committees are gone and certain people who have always benefited from them can no longer send the members tickets to their shows and other goodies, I can see SZA having more of a benefit than anyone else. She has a lot going for her and the more diverse voting body may want to see her win.

 

4 hours ago, Cheers said:

It might help. Grammys are all politics so this might be their way of “see? we award POC too!” Kinda like how they use Beyoncé as a token and spectacle and always televise her record breaking wins despite not giving her any wins in major categories. 

Since they no longer have committees who decide the final winners, this is not possible any more. That is why last year saw everyone practically take something home. There is no longer a "narrative" that has to be followed for ratings; the voters truly decide now.

Edited by Sannie
Posted

Of course. She deserves it

  • ATRL Moderator
Posted
2 hours ago, Sannie said:

Since they no longer have committees who decide the final winners, this is not possible any more. That is why last year saw everyone practically take something home. There is no longer a "narrative" that has to be followed for ratings; the voters truly decide now.

The committees were for the nominations, not the winners. The winners have always been decided by a popular vote.

Posted

Go SZA :party:

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.