base talk Spotify planning to charge for fraudulent streams, who's in danger?

[Bentley]

but they accept bribes to keep “artists” at the top of their biggest playlist for over a year…

 

OK Spotify 

 

[NEX]

Up and coming industry plants, you're in danger gurls! 

[Bentley]

1 minute ago, Navyofbadgals said:

Realistically no one we really know of will be affected by this  90% is CRAZY high pff

I- 

 

[artc0cx]

Kpop is over love to see it

[Rev8]

Yea, it's even more stupid that they are penalizing distributors who aren't able to detect these stuff

 

as someone said:

Quote

One of those executives described the gist of Kaplan’s comments: “We can’t determine if a new client is going to hire a marketing service that’s going to bot streams until they’ve done it. It’s like you can’t determine if your neighbor is going to commit a crime.” And the entity best able to monitor for fraudulent activity is Spotify itself. In this line of thinking, then, Spotify would be penalizing distributors for something that they didn’t do, can’t predict, and can’t spot as quickly as the streamer itself.  

 

[Navyofbadgals]

2 minutes ago, Bentley said:

I- 

 

You Stan Camila please don’t start something you have no business starting

[Trash]

So they are just putting a very low price on payola?

[perfectillusion204]

35 minutes ago, Blanket said:

Taylor is in trouble

probably the artist with the least amount of fraudulent streams, bffr 💀

[Bentley]

Oh and tidal would never 

 

[MonsterTown]

the only right answer is BTS.
 

 

[Taylor Sniffs]

44 minutes ago, Blanket said:

Taylor is in trouble

The one whose current tour is breaking multiple attendance records? 

[Distantconstellation]

What about those playlists spotify keeps pushing. Remove playlists and lets see who collapses

[charot]

Columbia Records HQ rn

 

 

 

[rp662]

12 minutes ago, DockDock said:

the only right answer is BTS.
 

 

[Lille]

Make it 10%, smoke these rats out!

[wulmite]

I love how they pretend they don't know about it and don't let it happen

 

 

[dawnettakins]

[Almighty Gaga]

So what they're saying is that it's totally fine if a song only has 89% fraudulent streams. 

[kandicha]

they should lower the threshold to start charging by a lot, even 50% fraud is too much

[airplane]

the leviTTHating songstress would like to have a word

[flashfox]

All artists streaming numbers are fraudulent one way or another 

[BellKat]

The obsession with Jungkook some people have here is pathological

 

If people here actually cared about 'fraudulence', they would have rioted when that Blackpink song achieved 1B streams with 50% filtering rate 

They didn't tho and we know they threw tantrums because they felt he was threatening their faves (even though that was never going to happen as he planned a shortlived solo career)

Way to hit a nerve 

 

 

[Odette Violet]

1 hour ago, artc0cx said:

Kpop is over love to see it

They are selling out stadiums and arenas in the biggest markets all across the globe than some of the ATRL faves  so streams that pay less won't hurt them  

 

 

OT: My faves aren't exactly Spotify darlings, they are safe 

Edited November 15, 2023 by Odette Violet

[Wewee]

[kawk]

Jungkook, New Jeans, Taylor and Dua