Jump to content

1989 Taylor's Version review thread | MC: 95


Recommended Posts

Posted

Overexposed at this point 

  • Replies 161
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Anvarie

    18

  • PoisonedIvy

    8

  • Raspberries

    8

  • thinking

    7

Posted

Deserved because of Say Don't Go :ryan3:

Posted

I find all these 5 stars suspicious, since I've seen a lot of fans say most of the versions sound lazy and horrible compared to the original ones (I wouldn't know I don't listen to Miss Swift's music).

  • Like 2
  • Thumbs Down 3
Posted
4 minutes ago, Sonny said:

I find all these 5 stars suspicious, since I've seen a lot of fans say most of the versions sound lazy and horrible compared to the original ones (I wouldn't know I don't listen to Miss Swift's music).

It's because nowadays metacritic scores are far more reflective of the PR around an artist and not the musical quality which is why BGKC and TAS get these inflated scores. You're telling me these poorly mixed songs are all 10/10?

  • Like 8
  • Thumbs Down 1
Posted
4 minutes ago, Sonny said:

I find all these 5 stars suspicious, since I've seen a lot of fans say most of the versions sound lazy and horrible compared to the original ones (I wouldn't know I don't listen to Miss Swift's music).

everyone is happy with 1989TV except one or two songs. there is one vault track that is a fan favourite and the rest are well received as well. none of these songs sound lazy or horrible. 

  • Like 1
Posted
5 minutes ago, Sonny said:

I find all these 5 stars suspicious, since I've seen a lot of fans say most of the versions sound lazy and horrible compared to the original ones (I wouldn't know I don't listen to Miss Swift's music).

To be fair, fans would actually be the ones that are the most likely to not enjoy the re-recordings. We've been sitting with the OG for so long and getting really used to them. For the fans that are listening to each song purposefully looking for things different, they will obviously be complaining. The public at large doesn't do that. 

Posted
29 minutes ago, Sonny said:

I find all these 5 stars suspicious, since I've seen a lot of fans say most of the versions sound lazy and horrible compared to the original ones (I wouldn't know I don't listen to Miss Swift's music).

You don’t listen to her music, but you are invested in her like this? :confused:  

Posted

The bitterness in here

 

Don't worry, girlies, it won't stay at 100 forever

 

:clack:

Posted
34 minutes ago, Sonny said:

I find all these 5 stars suspicious, since I've seen a lot of fans say most of the versions sound lazy and horrible compared to the original ones (I wouldn't know I don't listen to Miss Swift's music).

Literally everyone is happy with the re-recording. 

Posted

Deserved. The TV is great.

Posted

I know smashes and wildest dreams did that :alexz:

Posted

stop the count!! :gaylorcat2:

Posted

Bullying critics works

Posted (edited)

what is even the point of reviewing them :rip: she doesn't do anything original with the re-recordings, they're just boring recreations of the originals and then like five bonus tracks that nobody in the GP will ever hear. 

 

If the scores are that far above the original reviews when the songs were actually made then it's clearly just to appease the angry mob. 

Edited by HonourableVomit
  • Like 3
  • Confused 1
  • Thumbs Down 2
Posted

the bitterness in this thread, we love to see it :hippo:

  • Like 1
Posted

:dies:

Posted

Album of the year for a reason :hippo:

Posted

The fumes :dies:

Posted

Clash gave it 9/10 BTW.

Posted
1 hour ago, Lemon said:

You don’t listen to her music, but you are invested in her like this? :confused:  

Who's invested? My friends are fans and I see their tweets on my timeline, it's not that serious! 

Posted

The fact that this is more critically acclaimed than albums like Golden Hour is such a pisstake

Posted
1 minute ago, Sonny said:

Who's invested? My friends are fans and I see their tweets on my timeline, it's not that serious! 

Who is taking it “serious”? I mean, your first comment can’t be serious anyhow. :laugh: 

Posted

The Independent: 3/5 

 

:clack:

Posted
7 minutes ago, Cloröx said:

The Independent: 3/5 

 

:clack:

Quote

This is some of the best pop of the 21st century. Potentially some of the best pop ever made. A few bits of middling production or some slightly-too-good vocals won’t change that.

Yet they gave the original also 3/5 :deadbanana2:

  • Haha 1
Posted
5 hours ago, WildOne said:

Well, they were.

Glad someone here has ears.

 

I love Taylor, saw the movie, have physicals of a lot of the albums, have seen multiple tours (couldn't afford Eras 😭) but letting these sound SO much worse than the originals honestly feels like a heartless cash grab at this point. If she really was coming from a place of wanting to "own her art" I just feel like she would've tried harder. Given access to the original sessions to study (which she and her producers have), I could've done a better job than this, and people who can produce as well as me are NOT THAT HARD TO FIND. It's just laziness and it feels disrespectful to the fans. You ruin the legacy of one of the tentpole pop albums of the decade and expect us to buy new CDs/vinyls/merch? Come on Taylor.

Buddy you have to let go that these were ever going to be exact copies

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.