Badgalbriel Posted August 23, 2023 Posted August 23, 2023 She should do it in 2025 to announce her next era at the end.
Embustera Posted August 23, 2023 Posted August 23, 2023 When she starts flopping. Probably when she’s around 40 years old.
L0verb0y Posted August 23, 2023 Posted August 23, 2023 (edited) It would be super iconic if she did it Feb 2025 to close out the Eras era. Right after the massive tour ends, all re-releases out, concluding two major triumphant chapters in her career. As for the too-early debate, she could do it now while she's bigger than them AND she can do it again later when she becomes a legacy act. She currently has enough of a hits catalogue for two different shows, imagine what she could have in another 10-15 years. Edited August 23, 2023 by L0verb0y
cat1867 Posted August 23, 2023 Posted August 23, 2023 12 minutes ago, L0verb0y said: It would be super iconic if she did it Feb 2025 to close out the Eras era. Right after the massive tour ends, all re-releases out, concluding two major triumphant chapters in her career. As for the too-early debate, she could do it now while she's bigger than them AND she can do it again later when she becomes a legacy act. She currently has enough of a hits catalogue for two different shows, imagine what she could have in another 10-15 years. I think both Katy Perry and the weeknd kinda of wasted for the superbowl by using them to close out monster eras instead of launching a new era. Taylor will be fine either way but I think it would be a waste. The eras tour is already so iconic, she doesn't need to do the Superbowl to cement. Yes , she could always do it twice but I don't think she will want too.
Gui Blackout Posted August 23, 2023 Posted August 23, 2023 Why would she waste her time and money on that thing? She's already the biggest legend of her time and her tour gives her music a biggest boost than the SB ever could. She got nothing to gain from it.
Recommended Posts