Jump to content

Lady Gaga, the only name that can fill both stadiums and film theaters. Why?


Recommended Posts

Posted
1 minute ago, Leptine said:

For somebody who claims to be a movie expert you clearly don't know a lot of things.

 

 

:deadbanana:

  • Replies 67
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Leptine

    5

  • vale9001

    4

  • Mystic Boy

    3

  • Into The Void

    3

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted

She's a GP darling.

Posted
8 minutes ago, vale9001 said:

Yeah Martin Scorsese, Chazelle, Spielberg, Fincher, Cuaron, Joon - ho, Inarritu, Tarantino

 

they all are fighting to have Lady Gaga in one of their films :ahh:

 

it's not like she has made a movie with bradley cooper, the director of the hangover saga, ridley scott (who is making average movies since the 90s expect maybe the martian) and Robert Rodriguez.

 

She is there with Lupita, Emma stone, Janelle, Margot robbie, Saoirse Ronan and Anya Taylor Joy to name a few.

 

Live your dream little monsters :redface:

Girl what? Gaga has a far more acclaimed career than Anna Taylor-Joy and probably Janelle Monae with only two movies. 

Posted
17 minutes ago, vale9001 said:

Yeah Martin Scorsese, Chazelle, Spielberg, Fincher, Cuaron, Joon - ho, Inarritu, Tarantino

 

they all are fighting to have Lady Gaga in one of their films :ahh:

 

it's not like she has made a movie with bradley cooper, the director of the hangover saga, ridley scott (who is making average movies since the 90s expect maybe the martian) and Robert Rodriguez.

 

She is there with Lupita, Emma stone, Janelle, Margot robbie, Saoirse Ronan and Anya Taylor Joy to name a few.

 

Live your dream little monsters :redface:

The senseless meltdown :rip:

Posted
15 minutes ago, PlERRE said:

Because of talent

Because of acclaim

Because of beauty

Because of success. 

ATRL can't handle this.

 

200.gif 

Posted

Its no wonder shes TABS! TRICON! BLASTOISE! 

Posted (edited)

just 20 stadium dates got yall this cocky :deadbanana2:

Edited by truthteller
Posted

No. 

Posted

We know why…

 

:gaygacat4:

Posted

33cyhd3.thumb.png.dcc275ef8749c6b8480a6d

Posted

because she's the entertainment industry :jonny:

Posted

House Of Gucci promo rollout did it's thing i guess

Posted (edited)
15 minutes ago, truthteller said:

just 20 stadium dates got yall this cocky :deadbanana2:

 

just? like it's easy?

Edited by shyboi
Posted
1 hour ago, vale9001 said:

House of gucci, AHS5, sin city and machete kills are panned movie.

 

Also harry styles debuted with acclaimed movie Dunkirk.

The movie was panned but Gaga performance was acclaimed. 

Posted

All points lead to YES :clap3:

Posted
1 hour ago, GraceRandolph said:

HOG blew that Stepford Wives ripoff with the balding 1D member out of the water at the box office and didn't get pelted with disgusting rotten tomatoes by critics though. We are talking lead roles here, not Harry's glorified cameo given to him by a fellow balding Brit.

Clock that tea! Clock that tea! 

 

k7LeDfV.gif

Posted

I still don't feel like Lady Gaga has really carried a hit movie by herself. I definitely agree that she's had great success in film and is a certified movie star, but I'm still curious to see how a movie where she has top billing without the help of another major movie stars and/or major director would perform  :celestial5:

Posted

It's the combo of being the superheroine of pop and butts in seats actress

200.gif

Posted
2 minutes ago, Flanders said:

I still don't feel like Lady Gaga has really carried a hit movie by herself. I definitely agree that she's had great success in film and is a certified movie star, but I'm still curious to see how a movie where she has top billing without the help of another major movie stars and/or major director would perform  :celestial5:

and please tell me if this same standard is being applied to all actresses out there? no it's not. it doesn't matter if someone is on a movie with a top notch director or an ensemble cast, when their performance is acclaimed it is acclaimed because of them. so let's leave the "thank you bradley cooper" types of comments back in 2018 please. 

Posted
2 minutes ago, RideOrDie said:

and please tell me if this same standard is being applied to all actresses out there? no it's not. it doesn't matter if someone is on a movie with a top notch director or an ensemble cast, when their performance is acclaimed it is acclaimed because of them. so let's leave the "thank you bradley cooper" types of comments back in 2018 please. 

I didn't say anything like that :deadbanana2: I just think it's worth mentioning. The claim in the title is that the name alone can fill a theatre, so it shouldn't come as a suprise that that question is subject to discussion in the thread.. calm down

Posted
20 minutes ago, Freaky Prince said:

It's the combo of being the superheroine of pop and butts in seats actress

200.gif

“Butts in seats actress” made me SCREAM. 

Posted (edited)
2 hours ago, vale9001 said:

House of gucci, AHS5, sin city and machete kills are panned movie.

 

Also harry styles debuted with acclaimed movie Dunkirk.

 

1 hour ago, vale9001 said:

lady gaga only has an acclaimed movie. A musical.

 

I know monsters are living in a fantasy world when she is like the new nicole kidman and the new it girl in the movie industry and she is paving the way for pop star being actors (literally jared leto, it's comprimary i the last movies  is a bigger movie star and also a singer). Janelle Monae is a music star with most acclaimed movies and roles lately.

And music stars make movie since the golden age of hollywood :cupid:.

 

3 years after house of gucci is a well know news her performance is recognisez for not being a good performance, terrible wrong accent and cornish. Movie nerds hate it.

 

The road to see if Lady gaga can became a real respected movie star is very very long...we still have to see if a star is born doesn't stay as her only important role....

 

sorry but i'm a huge cinema expert and fanatic, seeing the monsters acting like Lady gaga is already a respected actress and this beast in movie industry is behind fun for me. 

 

 

 

 

 

1 hour ago, vale9001 said:

59 on metacritic for house of gucci

 

panned movie. The oscar said "are you serious?" to it. Bye. 

 

1 hour ago, vale9001 said:

Yeah Martin Scorsese, Chazelle, Spielberg, Fincher, Cuaron, Joon - ho, Inarritu, Tarantino

 

they all are fighting to have Lady Gaga in one of their films :ahh:

 

it's not like she has made a movie with bradley cooper, the director of the hangover saga, ridley scott (who is making average movies since the 90s expect maybe the martian) and Robert Rodriguez.

 

She is there with Lupita, Emma stone, Janelle, Margot robbie, Saoirse Ronan and Anya Taylor Joy to name a few.

 

Live your dream little monsters :redface:

The Meltdown :smitten:

i LOVE how FURIOUS some are still are at her glorious transition...

:ahh:

Edited by Mystic Boy
Posted
1 hour ago, vale9001 said:

lady gaga only has an acclaimed movie. A musical.

 

I know monsters are living in a fantasy world when she is like the new nicole kidman and the new it girl in the movie industry and she is paving the way for pop star being actors (literally jared leto, it's comprimary i the last movies  is a bigger movie star and also a singer). Janelle Monae is a music star with most acclaimed movies and roles lately.

And music stars make movie since the golden age of hollywood :cupid:.

 

3 years after house of gucci is a well know news her performance is recognisez for not being a good performance, terrible wrong accent and cornish. Movie nerds hate it.

 

The road to see if Lady gaga can became a real respected movie star is very very long...we still have to see if a star is born doesn't stay as her only important role....

 

sorry but i'm a huge cinema expert and fanatic, seeing the monsters acting like Lady gaga is already a respected actress and this beast in movie industry is behind fun for me. 

 

 

 

 

 

FVLZ8IFVUAAZFfc?format=jpg
 

this picture alone kinda shuts down your entire argument :rip:

 

24 minutes ago, Flanders said:

I still don't feel like Lady Gaga has really carried a hit movie by herself. I definitely agree that she's had great success in film and is a certified movie star, but I'm still curious to see how a movie where she has top billing without the help of another major movie stars and/or major director would perform  :celestial5:

i would actually argue that being in movies with some of the most respected actors and directors in Hollywood and still being considered the main draw for most moviegoers and film critics only helps the point being made in the OP. i think it’s more impressive for a pop star to carry a movie with an ensemble cast and a legendary director than to carry a movie where she is the only recognizable name involved.

 

 


‘House of Gucci’ Rotten Tomatoes critic’s consensus:


 

Quote

House of Gucci vacillates between inspired camp and dour drama too often to pull off a confident runway strut, but Lady Gaga's note-perfect performance has a timeless style all its own.

Audience consensus:

 

Quote

It can be slow going, but House of Gucci adds up to a fascinating story -- and Lady Gaga's performance is a knockout.

 

Posted (edited)
42 minutes ago, Flanders said:

I still don't feel like Lady Gaga has really carried a hit movie by herself. I definitely agree that she's had great success in film and is a certified movie star, but I'm still curious to see how a movie where she has top billing without the help of another major movie stars and/or major director would perform  :celestial5:

HOG was not a huge blockbuster by any means but it was definitely a hit when you consider its numbers as an R-rated drama released during the pandemic. She was in the film against some very seasoned actors and was still cited as the biggest reason to watch by the audiences polled:

 

Quote

Close to 40% of the audience said they came out for Lady Gaga, while 32% cited the ensemble cast of Adam Driver, Al Pacino, and Jared Leto, while 34% were intrigued by the Gucci family murder plot.

https://deadline.com/2021/11/encanto-house-of-gucci-resident-evil-thanksgiving-box-office-1234880192/

 

Forbes also emphasized this last year with the announcement of her latest role:

 

Quote

Lady Gaga is herself a butts-in-seats movie star, as shown both by Bradley Cooper’s A Star Is Born (the arguable centerpiece of Warner Bros.’ banner 2018 slate which earned $424 million on a $40 million budget) and Ridley Scott’s House of Gucci (a 2.5-hour true crime melodrama which earned $75 million domestic and $151 million worldwide in late 2021 as every other adult-skewing drama dropped dead theatrically).

https://www.forbes.com/sites/scottmendelson/2022/06/14/lady-gaga-as-harley-quinn-brings-real-star-power-to-a-joker-sequel/?sh=1def6d734413

 

 

We'll have to wait and see how Joker 2 and her subsequent roles fare and how they affect her bankability as a lead actress but, at least for now, she's proven that she can carry a film by herself, or she wouldn't be able to command a $10M paycheck and be the second highest paid actress of the year in just her third lead role :michael:

 

 

Edited by Marry Illusion Glory
Posted

Oh wow the receipts here, no one does it like her, literally.

 

hagCeLY.gif

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.