Jump to content

Meghan Trainor does AMA, Britney stans ruin it and drag her


Bimbo

Recommended Posts

3 hours ago, Lady Claire said:

Tea. I supported Britney but like... move on

"Move on"? The woman who made Britney live a hell for over a decade, built a career within the industry thanks to imposing herself as Britney's business manager, stole from her, exploited and abused her financially, plotted against her and her freedom, and is involved in many other violations of Britney's rights, that woman is out there living free with no repercussions of her criminal acts.

 

Meghan Trainor is in the know of that, she's willingly working with a human trafficker. Fans wouldn't go after her is Ms Double Toilets got Britney out of her filthy lipless mouth. That said, Meghan is not even a target, fans just saw the opportunity and dragged her.

Edited by Jeremiah
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 75
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Green

    3

  • gloamingtheplain

    3

  • Rev8

    3

  • Jeremiah

    3

3 hours ago, blueberries said:

Meghan has nothing to do with Britney's life choices, her fans are 40 year old and still acting like petty children which is not a good look :katie:

I'm a fan and nowhere near 40 YO. :deadbanana2:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Almighty Gaga said:

The most insufferable fanbase. They really think the world revolves around that conservatorship.

The way they think everyone spends their time reading all these conspiracies. :deadbanana2:

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If we backlash people for working with Dr Luke we should do the same with Lou Taylor tbh 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As they should :clap3:  Lou Taylor is a horrible person and deserves to be held accountable, acting like Meghan doesn’t know the things Lou Taylor is being accused of when Britney’s conservatorship was a pretty open secret in the industry and the abuse is now a known fact is ridiculous. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, Bimbo said:

UtdKuVX.png

:bibliahh:

PLEASE :bibliahh:

 

Between this and completely ignoring the one fan who took the time to write out a well thought out post. She could have at least commented “TLDR <3” on it to make him feel noticed. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, Jeremiah said:

"Move on"? The woman who made Britney live a hell for over a decade, built a career within the industry thanks to imposing herself as Britney's business manager, stole from her, exploited and abused her financially, plotted against her and her freedom, and is involved in many other violations of Britney's rights, that woman is out there living free with no repercussions of her criminal acts.

 

Meghan Trainor is in the know of that, she's willingly working with a human trafficker. Fans wouldn't go after her is Ms Double Toilets got Britney out of her filthy lipless mouth. That said, Meghan is not even a target, fans just saw the opportunity and dragged her.

 

Then drag that Lou woman. Meghan did nothing to her. Move on.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, blueberries said:

they seem to get a kick spending their day harrassing talented bna winning artists just like their fave :shakeno:

:cm: a nasty bunch 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is just stupid. No one in the GP knows about this damn connection. Most people moved on from Meghan years ago like myself and she was already stupid enough to release on the same day as Taylor and Carly. She's going to be last place among the three when the numbers come out. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Green said:

 

Then drag that Lou woman. Meghan did nothing to her. Move on.

Lou continues to be dragged by fans, that hasn’t changed but she’s not a celebrity with open socials. Asking Meghan if she remains in touch with such vile person is actually an extremely valid question.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Jeremiah said:

Lou continues to be dragged by fans, that hasn’t changed but she’s not a celebrity with open socials. Asking Meghan if she remains in touch with such vile person is actually an extremely valid question.

Right? This woman literally is an abuser/has profited off of Britney's name for over a decade. Basically built her career off of the conservatorship. If fans wanna question that to one of her clients, who remains in bed with Lou Taylor, then what's wrong with that?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Isn’t Meghan skyrocketing on Spotify with her new song and about to get a hit out of it?

Hmmm looks like the sabotage attempt didn't work…

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

On 10/22/2022 at 4:46 PM, MusicLoverDude said:

This is just stupid. No one in the GP knows about this damn connection. Most people moved on from Meghan years ago like myself and she was already stupid enough to release on the same day as Taylor and Carly. She's going to be last place among the three when the numbers come out. 

her song is doing cute Britney stans and their unfair behaviour are meaningless to real life :toofunny2:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

44 minutes ago, SharonStone said:

Isn’t Meghan skyrocketing on Spotify with her new song and about to get a hit out of it?

Hmmm looks like the sabotage attempt didn't work…

Y'all act like Britney's stans went out of their way to put a target on Meghan's back when in reality they just took the opportunity to ask her a very valid question. Where's the dragging exactly? Y'all say much worse stuff about women who work with D. L*ke like Nicki, Kim and even Mariah, but suddently the standards aren't the same when it comes to Meghan working with vile people? Why? Because it envolves Britney whom y'all have had a VERY weird negative obsession for years upon years at this point? What does Meghan's song have to do with this thread? Y'all are really in here serving WORMS for brains. :deadbanana4:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 10/22/2022 at 11:43 AM, Rev8 said:

Even if she was just a manager....she is still trash :alexz3: Yup Yup

 

 

 

she went to say that Britney doesnt record her stuff (and lips her songs) shortly after :toofunny3: like..several shady things to say about an Artist (on separate occasions) who u allegedly like?

RIGHT when the Conservatorship Drama was happening?

 

Artists like her Know better what to say and what not to :ahh: dont act like she was just "speaking the truth"

 

 

ot: The way she is getting dragged on Reddit for her short answers and just posting her sales links :toofunny3:

*non Army related btw*

 

Are you denying that Britney doesn’t sing her songs and lip syncs? 
 

Britney Jean era happened the same time as her debut. It’s literally the truth. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 10/23/2022 at 4:29 PM, Hook Up said:

Right? This woman literally is an abuser/has profited off of Britney's name for over a decade. Basically built her career off of the conservatorship. If fans wanna question that to one of her clients, who remains in bed with Lou Taylor, then what's wrong with that?

Do people not understand how contracts work? Only in rare cases can people fire their management. 

 

Most of the time they will be contractually bound so that managers can’t set up someone’s career for them to ditch them once the hard work is done. 
 

I’m honestly shocked how uneducated Britney fans are sometimes considering all of this was explained as part of FreeKesha which ultimately kickstarted the FreeBritney movement after Kesha’s movement paid off. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Kesha literally sat there and explained that her management was working with Luke, and that she couldn’t get new management because of contracts, and yet Britney stans think artists like Meagan Trainer aren’t contractually bound to their management for a set amount of albums like Kesha was. 

 

You are all so quick to yell FREEBRITNEY and attack everyone else but refuse to even read a paragraph of the information around FreeKesha and what was learnt. Do you think Kesha enjoyed having management that reported her every move to Luke? Contracts exist for management as well. 
 

Some of you REALLY need to grow up and learn that attacking someone who’s associated as part of a contract isn’t a good look. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, gloamingtheplain said:

Are you denying that Britney doesn’t sing her songs and lip syncs? 
 

Britney Jean era happened the same time as her debut. It’s literally the truth. 

Are u denying being obtuse?

Do u think if a popular celeb talks about Rihanna not writing her songs or Beyonce acting like she wrote her songs, it wouldn't be taken as a shade?

 

It's really funny how some of yall can't comprehend what we are trying to say.

 

 

 

1 hour ago, gloamingtheplain said:

 

FreeKesha which ultimately kickstarted the FreeBritney movement after Kesha’s movement paid off. 

:bibliahh:

No wonder u don't get our points

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, gloamingtheplain said:

Kesha literally sat there and explained that her management was working with Luke, and that she couldn’t get new management because of contracts, and yet Britney stans think artists like Meagan Trainer aren’t contractually bound to their management for a set amount of albums like Kesha was. 

 

I really don't know anything about Meghan Trainor's situation at all, but just came here to say that this isn't really accurate.

 

Her management(s) were never working with Luke, they were her only allies against Luke. She hired David Sonenberg in 2005 because he was not a Luke loyalist (like Larry Rudolph would have been) and he and Dr. Luke also could not stand each other. It has also been revealed in the lawsuit documents that Dr. Luke and Jack Rovner from Vector Management, Kesha's longtime manager since 2009, completely despise each other - so much that he got named as defendant in the lawsuit alongside Kesha.

 

It is the other way around: because her managements have always been on her side, Luke tried to sideline them from day one and usurp their power. That is why he first wanted Kesha to sign with Larry Rudolph as her personal manager and then used his exclusive management provision from Kesha's 2005 contract with KMI to force her to fire David Sonenberg in 2008 and then later to make decisions over Jack Rovner's head during Warrior and entangle him in the lawsuit. We don't actually know anything about Kesha's contract with Vector Management, we only know all the Luke-related contracts which indeed have specific album commitments. 

 

What you're actually referring to is the old Sony executive. The former Sony executive under Doug Morris was indeed in bed with Luke. They entered into a joint-defense agreement with Luke shortly after Kesha showed them her California complaint and basically stabbed Kesha in the back with that. But that was Sony, not her personal management. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Britney stans are pathetic just like their fave :ahh:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 10/22/2022 at 1:17 AM, FOCK said:

Contractual obligation. 

 

She also destroyed Britney’s Christmas classic. 

Love your avi, I miss those seasons of the Pokemon anime so much.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.