Horizon Flame Posted October 11, 2022 Posted October 11, 2022 5 hours ago, Mikeymoonshine said: I don't think anyone on the left supports Tulsi anymore but she really did fool a lot of lefties back in the day. Yang too Bernie was the only trustworthy one. Him and also maybe Marriane Willamson the crystal orb lady Marianne is a grifter. She’s just as bad.
Sugar-Rush Posted October 11, 2022 Posted October 11, 2022 Well even a broken clock is right twice a day, but why did it take her this long to make this decision when she clearly had little in common with other Democrats.
ZIVERT Posted October 11, 2022 Posted October 11, 2022 I see people are already trying to justify their defense of her in hindsight and try to rewrite history never change, ATRL
Communion Posted October 11, 2022 Posted October 11, 2022 (edited) 1 hour ago, Horizon Flame said: Marianne is a grifter. She’s just as bad. Are you gonna post those right-wing conspiracies again that she denies the existance of AIDs that got debunked? Grifter is a specific term that has to mean something. You can't just use it incoherently. You can't be a grifter without a grift. She's not into her love crystal energy stuff cause she thinks it will sell - she genuinely believes it. By all means, feel free to think she's whacky or that the naturalist tone of her views can come off techphobic, but no, she's also by the same accord not a grifter nor someone who thinks you can pray diseases away like you've claimed previously. This is the issue with too the Russian spy nonsense that made leftists defend Tulsi. Make criticisms but at least don't make batshit insane ones done in bad faith. Tulsi has horrific, transphobic views but being a transphobe doesn't make you a spy. Marianne can be quirky (and no honest person would group Marianne Williamson and Tulsi together) but fluffing your worldview in talk of psychic love energy doesn't make someone anti-science. Edited October 11, 2022 by Communion
Icarus Posted October 11, 2022 Posted October 11, 2022 I bet she wants to be Trump's Vice President she wants what Kamala has
xDiamondx Posted October 11, 2022 Posted October 11, 2022 Welp, looks like that check from Russia just cleared The only thing she said smart was the anti-war points she brought up years ago... even then, there were better options.
fountain Posted October 11, 2022 Posted October 11, 2022 “Anti white racism” Sounds like a win to the Democratic Party to me
Eric. Posted October 12, 2022 Posted October 12, 2022 I'm not sure if she's gonna join the Republican party, but I just can't with anyone whining about "elites" while being very willing to uphold right wing rhetoric devised by... right wing elites with lots of money and influence.
Wicked Posted October 12, 2022 Posted October 12, 2022 I think it's interesting that someone born in American Samoa, which only exists because of european colonialism is talking about anti white racism.
Gui Blackout Posted October 12, 2022 Posted October 12, 2022 The way Hillary was 100% right about her
Protocol Posted October 12, 2022 Posted October 12, 2022 Trash but she didn't lie about the warmongering part, the Democratic Party is in bed with military industrial complex
The7thStranger Posted October 12, 2022 Posted October 12, 2022 11 hours ago, Communion said: This shows you don't even know the history we are talking about. She was literally a Democratic Party darling who was poised to become the head of the DNC. To say "Democrats never trusted her" is nonsense and would indicate someone having a political knowledge that doesn't go back beyond 2020. She was lauded and awarded by the party while having a homophobic past. That didn't matter to them. Her place in the party objectively only changed because she endorsed Bernie and said the DNC was rigging the primary in 2016. So to go "oh we knew it all along" or frame her claim to fame as rooted in the left is nonsense and shows somehow who doesn't actually know much about politics when looking back on who Tulsi Gabbard was and why her career is what it is now. She's deplorable and has awful views but let's be honest about how peopoe actually felt at the time. The left gave her a benefit of the doubt in 2016 cause it was a genuine risk to call out DNC corruption. The establishment gave her the benefit of the doubt because she's objectively attractive nd a military veteran. But how does this reflect how people outside of Washington felt about her? I think we’re talking about two different things here. You’re talking about the establishment, and I’m talking about the perception of her by the people.
Ibrahim Posted October 12, 2022 Posted October 12, 2022 Remember that time when Hillary called out Russian assets trying to manipulate the political landscape but didn't call out anyone specific and then Tulsi Gabbard got all offended like Hillary was talking about her? A pawn will always be a pawn.
Ichinaru19 Posted October 12, 2022 Posted October 12, 2022 On 10/11/2022 at 8:31 AM, Bang Up said: "racializing every issue & stoke anti-white racism" So she has a problem with "racializing every issue" except for when it comes to victimizing white people?
ATRL Moderator Azulito Posted October 12, 2022 ATRL Moderator Posted October 12, 2022 Does anyone still care about this unemployed attention seeker?
RockStarShit101 Posted October 13, 2022 Posted October 13, 2022 The word “too woke” is stupid because the world has been for decades woke, and if I’m wrong then she, as a female, wouldn’t be in her position now if people weren’t too woke years ago to give her the freedom to do so. It’s like lgbtq married couples who vote red foolishly not knowing they would overturn marriage equality in a heartbeat
nadiamendell Posted October 13, 2022 Posted October 13, 2022 She is just She's always come across as an opportunist that would literally jump on any movement to get attention/power/money. No backbone at all.
RunUpDoneUp Posted October 14, 2022 Posted October 14, 2022 She's a clear-cut conservative, I used to be blind by that fact but she is. The dem party has always been and to this day consistently pushes and SHOVES minorities to rally around their white chosen ones all the time. The antiwhite minority that exists is inconsequential, there's a reason why she chose to leave on that merit instead of standing with her allegedly poc counterparts in it and it's because she's a con, lmao. Imagine being a living example of proving Hilary right, she'll always be a never was and thank hesus for that. Rip, bozo.
anti-bitch Posted October 14, 2022 Author Posted October 14, 2022 On 10/13/2022 at 4:55 PM, RockStarShit101 said: The word “too woke” is stupid because the world has been for decades woke, and if I’m wrong then she, as a female, wouldn’t be in her position now if people weren’t too woke years ago to give her the freedom to do so. It’s like lgbtq married couples who vote red foolishly not knowing they would overturn marriage equality in a heartbeat "Woke" is just a buzzword to trivialize anything that goes against the interests of straight white evangelicals.
Recommended Posts