celeb news Juror on Amber Heard: "She would be crying and two seconds later turn ice cold."

[Diesel is Desire]

 

[FOCK]

 

Well.

 

 

[Chris]

Let's wait for the usual to storm in here, deflect from this, and accuse us once again of supporting and not caring about domestic violence.

[rzal]

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10923313/Depp-v-Heard-juror-says-none-believed-crocodile-tears.html#article-10923313

Quote

 

'What I think is truthful is that they were abusive towards each other. 

So she didn't defame him The jury system is such a joke.

[plasticboy]

Borderline personality disorder is characterized by rapidly shifting moods, so... 

[gatito]

 can we stop talking about this? it’s ******* boring at this point

[FOCK]

2 minutes ago, rzal said:

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10923313/Depp-v-Heard-juror-says-none-believed-crocodile-tears.html#article-10923313

So she didn't defame him The jury system is such a joke.

However the juror on Thursday said they reached their verdict based on the evidence on the case. 

'A lot of her story didn't add up... the majority of the jury felt that she was the aggressor."

 

'We followed the evidence,' he said. He added that he personally did not believe Depp ever hit Heard. 

 

Reading is what? 

[favorite crime]

4 minutes ago, Chris said:

Let's wait for the usual to storm in here, deflect from this, and accuse us once again of supporting and not caring about domestic violence.

we don't have to deflect, the fact that you think this isn't disgusting reflects poorly on your critical thinking skills

 

imagine judging a case based off of whether someone acted victim enough instead of the actual evidence provided for you

[Diesel is Desire]

Just now, FOCK said:

However the juror on Thursday said they reached their verdict based on the evidence on the case. 

'A lot of her story didn't add up... the majority of the jury felt that she was the aggressor."

 

'We followed the evidence,' he said. He added that he personally did not believe Depp ever hit Heard. 

 

Reading is what? 

[Chris]

1 minute ago, favorite crime said:

we don't have to deflect

 

1 minute ago, favorite crime said:

imagine judging a case based off of whether someone acted victim enough instead of the actual evidence provided for you

 

See what I mean?

[Price of Fame]

the meltdowns in the qrts

[State of Grace.]

This is such a joke. Disgusting.

[Khal]

Thought the point of the megathread was for everything regarding the case to stay THERE. 

[BreakinTheIce]

even in 2022, we're still judging peoples emotions. everyone responds to things in different ways, and the way people assume if you're not reacting "correctly" to somthing then you must be lying is just ridiculous.

 

amber could have been lying. but her emotions changing on the stand is not something that you should base that off of.

[BreakinTheIce]

14 minutes ago, FOCK said:

However the juror on Thursday said they reached their verdict based on the evidence on the case. 

'A lot of her story didn't add up... the majority of the jury felt that she was the aggressor."

 

'We followed the evidence,' he said. He added that he personally did not believe Depp ever hit Heard. 

 

Reading is what? 

where was the evidence that she ever hit him?

[rzal]

3 minutes ago, FOCK said:

However the juror on Thursday said they reached their verdict based on the evidence on the case. 

'A lot of her story didn't add up... the majority of the jury felt that she was the aggressor."

 

'We followed the evidence,' he said. He added that he personally did not believe Depp ever hit Heard. 

 

Reading is what? 

So... he doesn't believe he hit her but he was abusive. In the op-ed that apparently defamed him, she never says he hit her. There's also a lot of evidence proving that he hit her so clearly he didn't follow the evidence well, just like the jury instructions. 

[scenekiller]

5 minutes ago, BreakinTheIce said:

where was the evidence that she ever hit him?

He said he personally didn't believe Johnny hit Amber. Personally. He didn't mention whether he personally believed Amber hit Johnny.

 

"Followed the evidence" was a completely different statement from either of these, regarding the defamation aspects.

 

People will really ignore anything they can to defend this woman

Edited June 16, 2022 by scenekiller

[clee95]

When you put a braindead jury on.

[harwee]

someone is guilty of fecal forgery

 

 

[TaggedGalaxy]

Justice was served

[FOCK]

14 minutes ago, BreakinTheIce said:

where was the evidence that she ever hit him?

Her own admission on tape & a severed finger. 

 

11 minutes ago, rzal said:

So... he doesn't believe he hit her but he was abusive. In the op-ed that apparently defamed him, she never says he hit her. There's also a lot of evidence proving that he hit her so clearly he didn't follow the evidence well, just like the jury instructions. 

The title of the Op-ed, what was the basis of the defamation (not the contents of the article), is “I spoke up against sexual violence”. 

 

There is zero substantiated evidence that he hit her, bar a head-butting incident where the jury believed he was attempting to restrain her as she was hitting him. 

Edited June 16, 2022 by FOCK

[Mobility Mary]

I mean if this was an actual juror, he just admitted they had no idea what they were doing. If both were abusive that means she didn't defame him. Also he mentions 3 of them not being on Twitter and Facebook, but TikTok, YouTube and Reddit had the loudest anti-Amber propaganda out there. And the rest of the jury made sure not to discuss social media?  Great for them, but if they saw anything on social media they are biased anyway, it's not just about mentioning it in their verdict discussion.

 

Also choosing sides based on crap like body language? Humanity is truly doomed.

[Park Jinyoung]

Braindead

[Raspy]

ouch

[JoeAg]

34 minutes ago, gatito said:

 can we stop talking about this? it’s ******* boring at this point

right? i’d be glad to NEVER hear either of their sh*tty names ever again