celeb news Mick Jagger on Harry Styles: Reductive

[More Than A Melody]

13 minutes ago, badvibez said:

He said he doesn’t see the resemblance, but respects him. That’s the opposite of “reductive” 

They saw Harry and Mick Jagger in the same sentence and ran. Looks like a lot of people are upset about the ~queer aesthetics~  

Mick has talked really warmly about Harry multiple times and invited him to secret gigs and stuff. Like, they're definitely not friends but they're very friendly. There is absolutely no shade at all, but people love to see feuds so they'll run with it.

 

[Darkgalord]

[PoisonCandy]

He's only 2/3 albums in. He still has plenty of time to evolve. Just look at what happened with Gaga, everyone kept calling her a Madonna copy until around the mid-10's, but now everyone just sees her as Lady Gaga. Harry will grow out of this stage eventually, and instead of people calling him "the next Mick Jagger" or whatever, he'll just be known as Harry Styles.

[Young Volcanoes]

4 minutes ago, Protocol said:

Ignoring how ignorant and delusional it is to say Mick Jagger and the Rolling Stones are "forgotten", they have 20M+ monthly listeners on Spotify and their last tour, which ended in 2021 (that's last year for the numerically challenged) grossed $550 million, so even with stan wars'd receipts which seem so ludicrous when discussing a mega iconic band like Rolling Stones in the first place, no, not forgotten or washed up at all.

 

Now WHO the flying **** that is in your avatar, THAT is the question we need an answer to. Because I don't know.

All these stats don't change the fact that Rolling Stones is a washed up dad rock band and more people associate their name with the magazine nowadays than with the band itself. No amount of retirement home streams will change that.

Regarding the guy in my avi, you can go on Google and do a reverse image search if you want to know who he is... if you know how to use Google. 

[Protocol]

Just now, Young Volcanoes said:

All these stats don't change the fact that Rolling Stones is a washed up dad rock band and more people associate their name with the magazine nowadays than with the band itself. No amount of retirement home streams will change that.

Regarding the guy in my avi, you can go on Google and do a reverse image search if you want to know who he is... if you know how to use Google. 

Stay delusional and ignorant, I will pray for you and the unfortunate-looking boy in your avatar, whoever he is

[Keter]

I’m not a huge Harry fan, but he has solid vocal ability. Mick Jagger can’t sing for ****, especially now. We’ve moved past dad rock.

[Darkgalord]

It's so weird when old legacy acts behave this way when new young artists get inspired by them. It comes off as bitter.

Not all of them are like that though. 

[Britney Jean]

57 minutes ago, MadonnasBoyfriend said:

As Lindsay Lohan once said Harry Styles is this generations mic jagger

Lindsay ha mind

 

 

 

[More Than A Melody]

1 minute ago, Keter said:

I’m not a huge Harry fan, but he has solid vocal ability. Mick Jagger can’t sing for ****, especially now. We’ve moved past dad rock.

This is exactly one of the reasons I know Mick wasn't shading him. People are jumping on this, but Mick has never been considered a good singer and people have always made fun of his dance moves. For it to be shade he'd have to be considered good at the things he mentions and he's not, and he's 100% aware of it.

[truthteller]

 

[Mania]

She’s not me teas

 

[BOOMBAYAH]

I don’t even like Harry Styles like that but it’s pretty distasteful for Mick Jagger to speak about him in such a demeaning manner when he’s embraced him in the past + Harry has always showed him love. If he felt this way, there is a more euphemistic way to put it.

[Katamari]

i wish harry was reductive. i would love some classic rock styled songs from in the same vein as Rolling stones Exile or Sticky Fingers 

 

[Katamari]

2 minutes ago, BOOMBAYAH said:

I don’t even like Harry Styles like that but it’s pretty distasteful for Mick Jagger to speak about him in such a demeaning manner when he’s embraced him in the past + Harry has always showed him love. If he felt this way, there is a more euphemistic way to put it.

i doubt jagger had any malice when he said that but jagger is almost 80 i doubt he give as **** about how he is perceived

 

 

[Katamari]

16 minutes ago, Young Volcanoes said:

All these stats don't change the fact that Rolling Stones is a washed up dad rock band and more people associate their name with the magazine nowadays than with the band itself. No amount of retirement home streams will change that.

Regarding the guy in my avi, you can go on Google and do a reverse image search if you want to know who he is... if you know how to use Google. 

 

[KMO]

[More Than A Melody]

Just now, Nexto said:

Mr Jagger dragged and you can stay mad about it

 

 

Not this corny ass reply

[Almighty Gaga]

Quote

He doesn’t have a voice like mine or move on stage like me

 

 

Serving Cher's "she's not unbelievably talented, she's not beautiful" on Madonna

[MissedTheTrain]

I don’t get much shadiness from this?  It sounds like he’s addressing how Harry is compared to him….it’s true, their voices and performing are different, they just look alike.

[Mobility Mary]

He should apologize to Joni Mitchell for using the same name as one of her best songs as the title of his reductive album

[terrorblade]

oop

[sasashite]

1 hour ago, Elusive Chanteuse said:

As opposed to a poser from 1D?

[Dsmrs77]

I’m going to give Mick the benefit of the doubt and say that he doesn’t sound shady, but his taste level as of late has been concerning

 

 

Edited May 22, 2022 by Dsmrs77

[Sergi91]

[sasashite]

Mick Jagger is an immortal legend with millions of fans and a huge legacy. Someone's sister can't relate.