Jump to content

Johnny Depp vs. Amber Heard Trial


Bloo
Message added by Bloo,

Mentioning @ATRL Feedback or @ATRL Administration does nothing. No staff member sees those notifications. If there is a member that is breaking ATRL rules, please report them and provide any additional context you think would better inform how we should judge it.

Recommended Posts

Posted
7 minutes ago, Patient Zero said:

Let the Amber fanatics celebrate for once. Johnny's cross is a win for them, but it's just one win in a sea of losses. :celestial2:

How do you write things like this and then insist on being "impartial" :deadbanana4:

The cognitive dissonance...

  • Replies 4.4k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • NausAllien

    329

  • suburbannature

    225

  • Patient Zero

    187

  • Mobility Mary

    147

Posted
5 minutes ago, Patient Zero said:

Let the Amber fanatics celebrate for once. Johnny's cross is a win for them, but it's just one win in a sea of losses. :celestial2:

The way you’ve been trying to seem less biased since we all called you out at the same time, but you’re already back to posting this type of crap again? And Amber supporters are fanatics? The irony :bird: 

Posted

There are bruises in both versions. 

Posted (edited)

OBJECTION: this guy is too talented!!!

 

Amber's team is really bothered with this Emmy winning expert :bibliahh:

Edited by Patient Zero
Posted
1 minute ago, suburbannature said:

There are bruises in both versions. 

Do you mean the kit?

Posted
Just now, Merlls said:

Do you mean the kit?

No, I mean the bruises that a dozen witnesses testified to seeing (include a makeup artist who covered them).

Posted

Ambers lawyer objecting to his own question AGAIN :bibliahh:

 

And Amber fanatics getting mad at me for draggin her team :bibliahh:

Posted

What else did you rely on?

Witness attempts to answer his question

OBJECTION

 

WTF :bibliahh:

 

And now he's refusing to re-ask it because he lost the ruling. This is embarrassing for them. 

Posted

The judge is so done with Amber's lawyer :deadbanana2:

Posted

So he doesn't have any degree in computer sciences or computer forensics? What are his qualifications to be accepted as an expert exactly?

 

 

Posted
1 minute ago, Patient Zero said:

Ambers lawyer objecting to his own question AGAIN :bibliahh:

 

And Amber fanatics getting mad at me for draggin her team :bibliahh:

That literally happens all of the time in court when a witness is non-responsive, uses hearsay, goes beyond the scope, etc.

 

Posted
1 minute ago, Patient Zero said:

Ambers lawyer objecting to his own question AGAIN

You mean like Camille Vazquez did MULTIPLE times when she was cross-examining Amber?

 

Posted

AMber's lawyer is digging this hole deeper and deeper for himself :deadbanana4:

You can't win a technical debate with this witness.

Posted (edited)
16 minutes ago, suburbannature said:

No, I mean the bruises that a dozen witnesses testified to seeing (include a makeup artist who covered them).

you mean all her best friends? and the same makeup artist that slipped up during her testimony and and said she's an expert in creating bruises in the past?

 

 

Edited by kawk
Posted
Just now, kawk said:

you mean all her best friends? and the same makeup artist that slipped up during her testimony and and said she's created bruises in her past?

 

 

:deadbanana2: do you truly believe that's what happened

Posted
Just now, NausAllien said:

So he doesn't have any degree in computer sciences or computer forensics? What are his qualifications to be accepted as an expert exactly?

 

 

He has 39 EMMY'S for his film work among a plethora of other notable industry awards & a highly distinguished career in his field, including extensive experience in forensics, and is making perfect sense...

 

"BuTT He DOeSN'T hAVe a D3gwEE" :isudumblmao:

Posted
1 minute ago, FOCK said:

He has 39 EMMY'S for his film work among a plethora of other notable industry awards & a highly distinguished career in his field, including extensive experience in forensics, and is making perfect sense...

 

"BuTT He DOeSN'T hAVe a D3gwEE" :isudumblmao:

Serving: But you're not board certified, is that correct?  :isudumblmao:

Posted

A lot of you really don't know how court works with this "objecting to their own question' thing lol wtf. 

Posted

"people do not throw out evidence" the shade. 

Posted

The depp Stan panic :rip: 

Posted
7 minutes ago, kawk said:

you mean all her best friends? and the same makeup artist that slipped up during her testimony and and said she's an expert in creating bruises in the past?

 

 

not them editing the witness' face to look more evil :bibliahh:

Posted (edited)

Airport worker who intervened in the fight between Amber and her ex wife is finally exposing Amber as an ABUSER :bibliahh:

Edited by kawk
Posted
4 minutes ago, Kylizzle said:

A lot of you really don't know how court works with this "objecting to their own question' thing lol wtf. 

 

The judge's reaction, though :bibliahh:

Posted (edited)

Elaine trying the "you wanted to get on TV" line again ...

Does she know youtube & streaming platforms exists? Does she think everyone is just dying to get on "the moving picture box" in 2022? :rip:

Edited by FOCK
Posted
5 minutes ago, kawk said:

Airport worker who intervened in the fight between Amber and her ex wife is finally exposing Amber as an ABUSER :bibliahh:

She was the arresting officer :deadbanana2: I wonder why they didn't mention that. 

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.