GraceRandolph Posted July 2 Posted July 2 Just now, If U Seek Amy said: Oh god yeah. They have so many losing their mind and freaking out over a debate and temporary polling drops. They have people right where they want them. I just stopped tuning in for now till people settle I knew multiple relatives on both sides of my family who are big Dems who either shut the debates off or had breakdowns watching it. It was absolutely awful and the gaslighting about it is not helping. It's not a media narrative.
Achilles. Posted July 2 Posted July 2 If Biden steps aside, I can't see anyone but Kamala being the nominee. Aside from the fact that the DNC will push it, I'm afraid it may just be logistically necessary. As part of the Biden campaign, she probably "inherits" all of his fundraising, mailing lists, donor lists, etc. Anybody else basically has to start from scratch I think. So the question is: Assuming that Kamala Harris becomes the Democratic nominee in the event of President Biden withdrawing from the race, should Biden simply decline the nomination, or would it be beneficial for him to actually retire from office immediately—enabling Harris to run as an incumbent president? I think the latter may be the better move; nothing would benefit Harris as a candidate more than a few months of actually demonstrating that she can be President.
GhostBox Posted July 2 Posted July 2 4 minutes ago, If U Seek Amy said: Oh god yeah. They have so many losing their mind and freaking out over a debate and temporary polling drops. They have people right where they want them. I just stopped tuning in for now till people settle they have started tripping themselves lately though so who knows.
Vroom Vroom Posted July 2 Posted July 2 2 minutes ago, Achilles. said: If Biden steps aside, I can't see anyone but Kamala being the nominee. Aside from the fact that the DNC will push it, I'm afraid it may just be logistically necessary. As part of the Biden campaign, she probably "inherits" all of his fundraising, mailing lists, donor lists, etc. Anybody else basically has to start from scratch I think. So the question is: Assuming that Kamala Harris becomes the Democratic nominee in the event of President Biden withdrawing from the race, should Biden simply decline the nomination, or would it be beneficial for him to actually retire from office immediately—enabling Harris to run as an incumbent president? I think the latter may be the better move; nothing would benefit Harris as a candidate more than a few months of actually demonstrating that she can be President. I can't see Biden resigning from the presidency. The only President that has resigned is Nixon, he does not want to be associated with him. Biden wants to end his career with "dignity" 1
Achilles. Posted July 2 Posted July 2 Internal Dem polling has Buttigieg and Whitmer polling best in swing states, with Buttigieg polling best in 5 states, tied for best in 1 state, and in second place by .1% in 1 state. The only place he's a distant second is Michigan, but he's also the only person but Whitmer who gets past 50% there. 1
If U Seek Amy Posted July 2 Posted July 2 6 minutes ago, GhostBox said: they have started tripping themselves lately though so who knows. I thought people learned a little more media literacy by now but clearly not. People will call the media so many names for being idiots. Then blindly believe and follow them when it suits them regardless of truth and it's so funny. Their primary goal is money people. Not truth 😂
GhostBox Posted July 2 Posted July 2 Ok I think I'm done playing along with the what if's for today. The truth is that it's more than likely Biden stays the nominee and that's it. Biden vs trump. 🤷 1
sunbathinganimal Posted July 2 Posted July 2 4 minutes ago, Vroom Vroom said: Biden wants to end his career with "dignity" 2
Achilles. Posted July 2 Posted July 2 It would be so fun to have a gay President from a red state in the Oval Office when SCOTUS overturns Obergefell. 1
ClashAndBurn Posted July 2 Posted July 2 One of Biden's closest advisors is a convicted felon. But yeah, he's bringing dignity to the White House
Blade Posted July 2 Posted July 2 21 minutes ago, Achilles. said: If Biden steps aside, I can't see anyone but Kamala being the nominee. Aside from the fact that the DNC will push it, I'm afraid it may just be logistically necessary. As part of the Biden campaign, she probably "inherits" all of his fundraising, mailing lists, donor lists, etc. Anybody else basically has to start from scratch I think. So the question is: Assuming that Kamala Harris becomes the Democratic nominee in the event of President Biden withdrawing from the race, should Biden simply decline the nomination, or would it be beneficial for him to actually retire from office immediately—enabling Harris to run as an incumbent president? I think the latter may be the better move; nothing would benefit Harris as a candidate more than a few months of actually demonstrating that she can be President. Not the plot of Veep
GhostBox Posted July 2 Posted July 2 (edited) 16 minutes ago, ClashAndBurn said: One of Biden's closest advisors is a convicted felon. But yeah, he's bringing dignity to the White House This sounds and reads like another fake story. they (the WhiteHouse) did say however say he helped Biden prep/write his speech he gave last night. I don't see how that would be anything bad. 😂 Edited July 2 by GhostBox
Redstreak Posted July 2 Posted July 2 9 minutes ago, ClashAndBurn said: One of Biden's closest advisors is a convicted felon. But yeah, he's bringing dignity to the White House We might really need to discuss if Jill and Hunter are risking our country for their own personal gains 1 1
GraceRandolph Posted July 2 Posted July 2 6 minutes ago, Redstreak said: We might really need to discuss if Jill and Hunter are risking our country for their own personal gains Shame on the Biden family. Bunch of enablers.
ClashAndBurn Posted July 2 Posted July 2 9 minutes ago, GhostBox said: This sounds and reads like another fake story. they did say he helped Biden write his speech he gave last night. I don't see how that would be anything bad. 😂 How? This sounds exactly like something Biden would do At this point it seems like he has retreated to only trusting his family for advice, and they're all elder abuse enablers
ClashAndBurn Posted July 2 Posted July 2 Wait. He did this AGAIN?! And EmptyBox still thinks he's fit for the presidency?????
Vermillion Posted July 2 Posted July 2 there goes the entire Democrats talking point that Hunter isn't being elected. If he's now de facto part of this administration this is a huge ****ing problem. 1
Vermillion Posted July 2 Posted July 2 17 minutes ago, Redstreak said: We might really need to discuss if Jill and Hunter are risking our country for their own personal gains of course they are certainly with the latter not sure there's much to discuss
GhostBox Posted July 2 Posted July 2 (edited) 8 minutes ago, ClashAndBurn said: Wait. He did this AGAIN?! And EmptyBox still thinks he's fit for the presidency????? That's literally what you are supposed to do when quoting someone else 💀 this isn't the dunk you think it is 😂 Edited July 2 by GhostBox 4 1 1 1
Tovitov Posted July 2 Posted July 2 2 minutes ago, GhostBox said: That's literally what you are supposed to do when quoting someone else 💀 this isn't the dunk you think it is 😂 I dont know why they downvoted you, using "end of quote" is a common way to emphasize said quote. 3 1
ClashAndBurn Posted July 2 Posted July 2 2 minutes ago, GhostBox said: That's literally what you are supposed to do when quoting someone 💀 this isn't the dunk you think it is 😂 Your dude's brain is cooked. Seriously, give it up deelishis God they need to 25 amendment this old ****, or impeach him or SOMETHING. ANYTHING. The fact that he's allowing his crackhead failson anywhere near the Oval Office is disqualifying.
Tovitov Posted July 2 Posted July 2 I'll say this, Biden's campaign has been a tightly run ship. That is, until now. Constant leaks, constant negative press. It truely feels like the wheels have come off. If we start seeing multiple democrats come out in support of another candidate, Im not sure how Biden can remain in the race.
Vermillion Posted July 2 Posted July 2 This revisionist history on Pete I'm seeing here is wild to me. He barely won Iowa and on a technicality amidst the caucus chaos. This immediate transfer of primary voters to the general electorate here also needs to stop. White blue collar older men are not voting for a gay man. Neither are Latino or older black voters. Point blank. 2
GhostBox Posted July 2 Posted July 2 2 minutes ago, Espresso said: This revisionist history on Pete I'm seeing here is wild to me. He barely won Iowa and on a technicality amidst the caucus chaos. This immediate transfer of primary voters to the general electorate here also needs to stop. White blue collar older men are not voting for a gay man. Neither are Latino or older black voters. Point blank. I agree. that's why I mentioned a Roy Cooper, Andy Beshear type of guy.
Recommended Posts