ClashAndBurn Posted yesterday at 03:17 PM Posted yesterday at 03:17 PM 10 minutes ago, Armani? said: The problem is turnout is not good with Black voters right now, the Democratic base is apathetic But Ossoff should do better with the Black vote margin wise than Kamala Maybe, but last time he was carried over the finish line by Warnock. He doesn't have that luxury this time, and Kemp is also an extremely popular governor. Ossoff's main hope of having even the slightest chance of staying in office comes from Kemp pulling a Sununu and not running, leaving the nomination open for Buddy Carter, Mike Collins, or Marjorie Taylor Greene to run for it. And even then, I'm not convinced he'd win. 1
MAKSIM Posted yesterday at 03:18 PM Posted yesterday at 03:18 PM (edited) 14 minutes ago, Armani? said: Only because they dragged it out, I was expecting a more split vote, although still to keep the ban No dem-appointed justice would be able to reasonably argue that this is against free speech, because it goes against basically every single Supreme Court precedent and how free speech has been interpreted in the past. Im surprised it even went to the Supreme Court because it's such a non-question. The opinion itself reads like a con law 1 hypo. Edited yesterday at 03:19 PM by MAKSIM 2
FameFatale Posted yesterday at 04:20 PM Posted yesterday at 04:20 PM B b but I thought republicans were pro family. I actually agree with Rep Luna for once. 1 1
FameFatale Posted yesterday at 04:22 PM Posted yesterday at 04:22 PM Wild this isn't getting as much attention 1 1
anti-bitch Posted yesterday at 05:03 PM Posted yesterday at 05:03 PM 1 hour ago, on the line said: That's assuming any of them put their phones down long enough to show up at the polls. Phone addiction is real, but it's not fair to single out one app causing it. And Tiktok's not getting banned because of that. If the app really has 170 million users, tomorrow could be chaotic with people trying to find an alternative app. 1
VOSS Posted yesterday at 05:21 PM Posted yesterday at 05:21 PM This 28th amendment stuff is not serious and frankly just embarrassing
ClashAndBurn Posted yesterday at 05:55 PM Posted yesterday at 05:55 PM 31 minutes ago, VOSS said: This 28th amendment stuff is not serious and frankly just embarrassing It's basically a last gasp of desperation because they know that they've damaged the party so badly that if they somehow fail to win in 2028 when they force Josh Shapiro down our throats, they won't be winning any more presidencies until 2044.
Bears01 Posted yesterday at 06:56 PM Posted yesterday at 06:56 PM 15 minutes ago, FameFatale said: I don't mean to sound apathetic, but: I don't see the point in protesting Trump. He was democratically elected this time. He's the most popular he's ever been. You think he has any reason to listen to these people protesting him? 4
ClashAndBurn Posted yesterday at 07:28 PM Posted yesterday at 07:28 PM (edited) 32 minutes ago, Bears01 said: I don't mean to sound apathetic, but: I don't see the point in protesting Trump. He was democratically elected this time. He's the most popular he's ever been. You think he has any reason to listen to these people protesting him? He was democratically elected last time, according to the system we have. He won a plurality of votes this time, sure, but that doesn't mean anything when a sizeable portion of the voting population chooses the couch over either of the viable candidates. And a minority of swing voters even chooses who wins when the rest of the country is pretty locked in at 48-48% split, no matter how badly the party in charge has governed. Which is to say, protesting him last time also meant absolutely nothing. It was performative and only served to make liberals feel good about themselves, as though they were part of some righteous resistance. This time, it's just as performative, but it's also less impactful because resistance liberalism has once and for all proven to be a massive, unmitigated failure. All it gave us in the end was Joe Biden, the most worthless puppet President ever elected to office, and his even more worthless ***** of a VP. And they both turned out to be not just MORE UNPOPULAR, but also MORE HATED than Trump ever was, even after he attempted his failed coup. Edited yesterday at 07:30 PM by ClashAndBurn 3 1
Virgos Groove Posted yesterday at 08:41 PM Posted yesterday at 08:41 PM Bringing back the classics, I see… 1
GhostBox Posted 22 hours ago Posted 22 hours ago Speaking of the right lying all the time and getting rewarded for it 1
Communion Posted 16 hours ago Posted 16 hours ago If we're finally breaking our silence and speaking our truth on the eve of Trump's 2nd term... "Holocaust Harris" was extremely effective messaging and probably just as effective as "Kamala is for They/Them". 1
Recommended Posts