Communion Posted January 11 Posted January 11 1 hour ago, ClashAndBurn said: Not Orb Mother thinking she can still get a foot in the door. NOBODY wants you. You have a constituency of ZERO. You have never been elected to anything in your entire career and you NEVER will be. Not me reading this over and over thinking its the DNC Ethics Council, only to realize it's the DNC... Ethnic Council? It's a such a shame identity politics and standpoint theory have basically become a joke by virtue of liberal ratfucking making these concepts seem laughable and fraudulent. 2
dman4life Posted January 11 Posted January 11 All of this complying in advance before Trump takes over is kinda scary. The first Trump presidency was digestible because it atleast felt like the media and corporations still wanted to keep him accountable. It feels completely different now. 1
CandyCoatedClouds Posted January 11 Posted January 11 (edited) Do you think if things are as terrible as we think they will be, that some of the states will threaten to secede from the union? Just as a way to get Trump or congress to listen to them or stop any potential tariff and or invasion plans? Usually that's in the Republican playbook but if California (the fourth largest economy in the world) or Illinois (which holds the third largest city in the U.S.) were to say that if Trump tries anything, they'd leave the union, I feel like that would hold a lot of water. I just wonder how bad it would have to be for one of them to declare that or even threaten it. No one in the Democratic party has any fangs or any gaul, except to the more progressive members or their own party. Edited January 11 by CandyCoatedClouds
Thuggin Posted January 11 Posted January 11 50 minutes ago, Vermillion said: Don't forget the endless texts. I'm still getting donation texts 7 times a day from whatever PACs ActBlue provided my phone number to. Seriously, why would I ever want to donate through ActBlue again if they're just going to punish me by selling my data to whatever scam companies they can find? 1
ClashAndBurn Posted January 12 Posted January 12 2 hours ago, Vermillion said: Arguably, Garland was chosen for the very reason that he WOULD go soft on Republicans. He was meant to be an argument for the depoliticization of DOJ due to the fact that he was Obama's "compromise" pick for SCOTUS. He was literally A COMPROMISE from the beginning. It's very clear that they were quietly hoping that Trump would step quietly out of the political limelight so they'd never have to worry about pursuing him criminally. The documents issue and the raid on Mar-a-Lago meant they couldn't avoid it anymore even though they desperately didn't want to prosecute him for anything at all. That's the thing about Democrats. They always try to present olive branches to the other side and promote bipartisanship and they ALWAYS get bitten on the hand while doing so. They are absolutely ******* stupid for continuing to do this over and over, but that's just what they truly want. Which is why they are caving en masse on the Laken Riley Act as we speak. 1
Blankspace2010 Posted January 12 Posted January 12 6 hours ago, CandyCoatedClouds said: Do you think if things are as terrible as we think they will be, that some of the states will threaten to secede from the union? Just as a way to get Trump or congress to listen to them or stop any potential tariff and or invasion plans? Usually that's in the Republican playbook but if California (the fourth largest economy in the world) or Illinois (which holds the third largest city in the U.S.) were to say that if Trump tries anything, they'd leave the union, I feel like that would hold a lot of water. I just wonder how bad it would have to be for one of them to declare that or even threaten it. No one in the Democratic party has any fangs or any gaul, except to the more progressive members or their own party. No. Everybody will do nothing as always.
Blankspace2010 Posted January 12 Posted January 12 6 hours ago, CandyCoatedClouds said: Do you think if things are as terrible as we think they will be, that some of the states will threaten to secede from the union? Just as a way to get Trump or congress to listen to them or stop any potential tariff and or invasion plans? Usually that's in the Republican playbook but if California (the fourth largest economy in the world) or Illinois (which holds the third largest city in the U.S.) were to say that if Trump tries anything, they'd leave the union, I feel like that would hold a lot of water. I just wonder how bad it would have to be for one of them to declare that or even threaten it. No one in the Democratic party has any fangs or any gaul, except to the more progressive members or their own party. No. Everybody will do nothing as always. 2
Vermillion Posted January 12 Posted January 12 Kinzinger resurfaced this, apparently got lost in the shuffle. 2 2
CandyCoatedClouds Posted January 12 Posted January 12 18 hours ago, Blankspace2010 said: No. Everybody will do nothing as always. A country of wimps. I hate it here sometimes.
Thuggin Posted January 13 Posted January 13 Right wing Christians saying LA is paying for its sins. But when Florida and other southern states had the hurricanes it was Democrats with their weather machines. 4
ClashAndBurn Posted January 13 Posted January 13 Insufferable piece of human garbage. His view on how to win elections was proven completely wrong and was utterly rejected, and he still finds a way to heap the blame entirely on progressives 1
ClashAndBurn Posted January 13 Posted January 13 There's also just the fact that people didn't hate Biden because he was progressive (because he wasn't - he was a ******* moderate that served platitudes to the progressive portion of the base to keep them in line, but never planned on following through with anything they actually wanted to see). He was hated because he was extremely old and senile. And his administration AND his entire party knowingly lied to everyone about his ability to serve. Kamala was complicit in the coverup and was never ever going to be deemed trustworthy as a result. 2
Dera Posted January 13 Posted January 13 On 1/11/2025 at 2:28 PM, dman4life said: All of this complying in advance before Trump takes over is kinda scary. The first Trump presidency was digestible because it atleast felt like the media and corporations still wanted to keep him accountable. It feels completely different now. just how I feel. it's so eerie how even public-facing institutions are falling in line for a transparently corrupt government. like there is no panic anymore, no urge to fight. and most importantly, no sense of privacy or safety on this data-scrubbed internet. makes me think it's going to be so easy for the state to silence opposition in this climate.
hoax Posted January 13 Posted January 13 (edited) 3 hours ago, VOSS said: 2026 governor 2028 POTUS? He'd get a 1972/1984 nuclear wipeout Maybe the girls who have given up on the Democratic Party altogether ought to throw some support behind a prospective campaign in a kamikaze tactic, cause he might just very well kill the party off Edited January 13 by wastedpotential 1
Recommended Posts