Jump to content

2024 US Election Megathread πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡ΈπŸ›οΈ


Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)
18 minutes ago, storminthedark said:

Some of these discussions are teetering further into straight up xenophobia at anyone who isn't American adding their perspective.

Forgive me for not taking the preaching of an Australian about the importance of giving empathy and grace to an election loser running off on vacation when she should be doing her job at a time where it matters the most with the utmost seriousness it deserves! Or their ramblings about how American trans people need to accept that their mere existence is unpopular and they need to just accept that they need to take L after L after L when they are inevitably abandoned by the Democrats for being seen as electoral poison.

Β 

Her throwing away judicial appointments that Trump gets to immediately fill in less than two months shows a severe lack of care after months of campaigning that the country would slide into fascism with a Trump victory.

Β 

Now liberals are throwing out every excuse in the book, crowing about how she deserves to take a vacay after the complete and total repudiation she just earned? It's actually preposterous. And they honestly are showing just how unserious their entire world view is :bibliahh:

Edited by ClashAndBurn
  • Thanks 2

  • Replies 79.4k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Vermillion

    12273

  • GhostBox

    5755

  • ClashAndBurn

    3325

  • Communion

    3036

Posted

Now this reporting I believe, but not for Mike Rogers but Kash Patel :coffee2:Β 

Β 

Β 

Posted
3 minutes ago, Vermillion said:

Now this reporting I believe, but not for Mike Rogers but Kash Patel :coffee2:Β 

Β 

Β 

Oh yeah. MAGA talking heads have been saying this for weeks now. Charlie Kirk had a full segment on it earlier this week saying the new FBI director will make heads explode. He's been camped out at Mar-a-Lago for 2 weeks now advising Trump and their team :rip:Β I've learned if you listen to the MAGA talking head shows and watch their socials they blabber out than plans before it's out there but people don't take them seriously.Β 

Posted
15 minutes ago, ClashAndBurn said:

Forgive me for not taking the preaching of an Australian about the importance of giving empathy and grace to an election loser running off on vacation when she should be doing her job at a time where it matters the most with the utmost seriousness it deserves! Or their ramblings about how American trans people need to accept that their mere existence is unpopular and they need to just accept that they need to take L after L after L when they are inevitably abandoned by the Democrats for being seen as electoral poison.

Β 

Her throwing away judicial appointments that Trump gets to immediately fill in less than two months shows a severe lack of care after months of campaigning that the country would slide into fascism with a Trump victory.

Β 

Now liberals are throwing out every excuse in the book, crowing about how she deserves to take a vacay after the complete and total repudiation she just earned? It's actually preposterous. And they honestly are showing just how unserious their entire world view is :bibliahh:

She is not taking 6 weeks she's gone for a few daysΒ :deadbanana2:Yall are being hyberbolic and using this as an excuse to score political points against a woman you dont like.

She will be back on MondayΒ :rip:Β Nevermind the fact that her aides said she would be available to break ties if she was needed. The outrage is purely optics based, there is nothing substantive here to melt down over and that's obvious unless you are consumed by seething resentment towards this woman

Posted

Β 

Posted
10 minutes ago, Harrier said:

She is not taking 6 weeks she's gone for a few daysΒ :deadbanana2:Yall are being hyberbolic and using this as an excuse to score political points against a woman you dont like.

She will be back on MondayΒ :rip:Β Nevermind the fact that her aides said she would be available to break ties if she was needed. The outrage is purely optics based, there is nothing substantive here to melt down over and that's obvious unless you are consumed by seething resentment towards this woman

Any amount of time is significant, and she's wasted a full week of the lame duck session when a lot of the other weeks left in the year are also blacked out due to holidays. Holidays that she could have waited for instead of squandering valuable borrowed time.

Β 

Schumer has also already surrendered four appointments to Trump thanks to Kamala sipping mimosas and martinis on the beach. "Optics based" indeed :rofl:Β 

Posted

Β 

Posted

:rip:Β 

Β 

  • Haha 1
Posted
5 minutes ago, Vermillion said:

Β 

His mandate is still powerful even with a relatively thin plurality… considering no other Republican that wasn't already in either of the top two executive positions has won the popular vote since Reagan beat Carter 44 years ago. Downplaying this is just silly season with liberals huffing copium over their most significant defeat in almost half a century.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Posted

Β 

Posted

Β 

:ahh:Β 

  • Haha 3
Posted
48 minutes ago, ClashAndBurn said:

His mandate is still powerful even with a relatively thin plurality… considering no other Republican that wasn't already in either of the top two executive positions has won the popular vote since Reagan beat Carter 44 years ago. Downplaying this is just silly season with liberals huffing copium over their most significant defeat in almost half a century.

Trump cares.

Β 

Posted

Β 

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Posted

I don't know why everyone is acting as if Vance has just vanished into thin air. Just because he's not front and center doesn't mean he isn't in the background plotting something. He's the one who scares me the most honestly. Because he's actually competent.

  • Like 3
Posted

Β 

Posted

Β 

Posted

Β 

  • Haha 1
Posted

Megyn Kelly is off the rails :deadbanana2: That's another case study I need.Β 

Posted
4 hours ago, Harrier said:

The suggestion that I can't understand or comprehend American issues just because I'm Australian - and thus supposedly wildly more privleged than all Americans

This is just now dabbling in fallacies.Β 

Β 

No one said you're somehow more privileged than *every* American nor argued that the average Australian is more privileged or richer than *every* American. You know that's not a serious argument nor what was said.Β 

Β 

Of course affluent and rich Americans have far more riches than those in other Western nations. America is a rich nation. But most Western nations have a basic guarantee and floor of provided protections and services for a minimum standard of living that many poor Americans don't experience. Referencing labor protections and guaranteed time off as enjoyed elsewhere while not by for tens of millions in America was to that point.Β 

Β 

You say you can be deeply empathetic to Americans and thus aren't alien to the conversation, but your instinct to protect and defend what are to you just foreign diplomats and leaders and talk down to Americans questions that.

Β 

You're suggesting anyone having a negative sentiment to Harris venturing off on vacation is just a disgruntled extremist yet the average American is fueled by a deep-seeded mistrust of politicians as elitists and legislation as a thing of affluent academics and the highly educated.Β 

Β 

And instead of feeling snark towards these issues - as your posts often come across, othering yourself as an Australian by making it clear you obviously feel smarter or wiser as an Australian on how to exist in a nation than the average American - someone empathetic would question what conditions and circumstances create a population so wary of elites and resentful of elected officials as posh and privilege as opposed to viewing them as just a nation of innately conservative beasts.Β 

Posted
4 hours ago, storminthedark said:

Some of these discussions are teetering further into straight up xenophobia at anyone who isn't American adding their perspective.

Someone's nationality shouldn't somehow exclude them from discussing American politics. Obviously American politics impacts countless portions of the world.Β 

Β 

The issue of intent just comes into question when someone's sole engagement with American politics is scolding and claiming American people are regressive by nature - "Oh, you silly poor dumb progressives. Don't you know you're in a nation of uncivilized, uneducated beasts? Better things aren't possible in America so accept centrist pragmatism as the only way forward".

Β 

It's like when European try parroting that "of course universal progressive policies aren't going to work in such a country of so many races....". Like...oh; that's already iffy of a statement but worse when non-Americans try to say it. Like let's back up a bit here and realize what we're suggesting...

Posted


the big mumu wearing Karens ain't gonna like thisΒ 

  • Thanks 1
  • Haha 1
Posted

Like I don't think Americans are inherently by nature craving barbarism. Sometimes centrist politicking and campaign strategy is just...bad, even if it means the leftists you hate online end up getting to feel right:

Β 

Β 

Β 

  • Like 1
Posted

:ahh:

Β 

Β 

Β 

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Posted

Β 

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Posted

Until Bluesky delivers unhinged takes anywhere near this level, I'm not moving to that app. :hoetenks:

  • Haha 2
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.