Vermillion Posted November 9 Posted November 9 9 minutes ago, Relampago. said: Went to my boyfriend's friend's party tonight and everyone was talking about how much they think Gavin Newsom should run. They're all college educated, $100k + salary makers. 1
GraceRandolph Posted November 9 Posted November 9 19 minutes ago, Relampago. said: Went to my boyfriend's friend's party tonight and everyone was talking about how much they think Gavin Newsom should run. They're all college educated, $100k + salary makers.
Armani? Posted November 9 Posted November 9 Do we think Trump will go through with the nationwide abortion ban? Seems like something he'll do at the last minute.
Komet Posted November 9 Posted November 9 1 hour ago, GraceRandolph said: I mean we need a charismatic figure, but it's not 2008. We need to focus on economic populism. I agree, but the kii is that economic populist is likely to come with um... patriotic aesthetics that I don't think are gonna be appreciated much by the lefties who are currently loudest about Dems being centrist ot: the only thing Newsom can run is me into a mattress. And Ossoff can be VP 5
Vermillion Posted November 9 Posted November 9 Loudoun County, VA again being THE early national election arbiter. Really not looking forward to next year 1
Armani? Posted November 9 Posted November 9 5 hours ago, Bloo said: Now there's the Nancy Pelosi I know and loathe. We're doomed.
Leppie Posted November 9 Posted November 9 1 hour ago, Relampago. said: Went to my boyfriend's friend's party tonight and everyone was talking about how much they think Gavin Newsom should run. They're all college educated, $100k + salary makers. My Twitter feed is full of people wanting Gavin to run while calling him a sociopath at the same time 1 1
JustHoran Posted November 9 Posted November 9 (edited) There needs to be a recount in the swing states and an investigation just to make sure Elon and Trump didn't rig the election. We did it for the MAGATs in 2020, let's do it now just to make sure. We have WAY more reasons than we did in 2020 to do this. If nothing is found and Kamala truly lost the election, then fine. We let it go but something doesn't smell right. Edited November 9 by JustHoran 4
Armani? Posted November 9 Posted November 9 9 minutes ago, JustHoran said: There needs to be a recount in the swing states and an investigation just to make sure Elon and Trump didn't rig the election. We did it for the MAGATs in 2020, let's do it now just to make sure. We have WAY more reasons than we did in 2020 to do this. If nothing is found and Kamala truly lost the election, then fine. We let it go but something doesn't smell right. We lost, y'all gotta heal. 2
GraceRandolph Posted November 9 Posted November 9 26 minutes ago, JustHoran said: There needs to be a recount in the swing states and an investigation just to make sure Elon and Trump didn't rig the election. We did it for the MAGATs in 2020, let's do it now just to make sure. We have WAY more reasons than we did in 2020 to do this. If nothing is found and Kamala truly lost the election, then fine. We let it go but something doesn't smell right. She lost fair and square
Lose My Breath Posted November 9 Posted November 9 (edited) 15 hours ago, anti-***** said: If you look at the lost margins in the swing states, Kamala could have won this with just a million more votes, or less, placed strategically in those places. She didn't need a million more votes if strategically placed, she only needed 260k more votes between Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, and Michigan Edited November 9 by Lose My Breath 1
Wonderland Posted November 9 Posted November 9 42 minutes ago, JustHoran said: There needs to be a recount in the swing states and an investigation just to make sure Elon and Trump didn't rig the election. We did it for the MAGATs in 2020, let's do it now just to make sure. We have WAY more reasons than we did in 2020 to do this. If nothing is found and Kamala truly lost the election, then fine. We let it go but something doesn't smell right. Do you also think they decided not to swing the senate races to avoid suspicion? 1
Lose My Breath Posted November 9 Posted November 9 11 hours ago, Communion said: Almost like centrist Dems wanted Trump to win so they can perpetually fundraise off of this suffering The centrist dems voted, and voted for Kamala. Who didn't vote was the far left, they stayed home. 1 1
anti-bitch Posted November 9 Posted November 9 49 minutes ago, Lose My Breath said: She didn't need a million more votes if strategically placed, she only needed 260k more votes between Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, and Michigan Right. So... dooming canceled? Lol.
Armani? Posted November 9 Posted November 9 2 hours ago, Vermillion said: Yeah, I don't know how we're going to fix this quick enough. Regardless of their incredibly stupid choice to vote Trump, I don't think it's enough suburban White women to account for Latino men swinging 20 pts, they have to get Latinos back And now Democrats largest & only male base now is just there in the open like a sitting duck for Republicans to attempt to complete their coalition. And Democrats suck at messaging 3 2
Wonderland Posted November 9 Posted November 9 2 minutes ago, Armani? said: Yeah, I don't know how we're going to fix this quick enough And now Democrats largest & only male base is just there in the open like a sitting duck for Republicans to attempt to complete their coalition. And Democrats suck at messaging White men will start to get pissed off when republicans start catering more of their ads and media to Latino and Black men. And thus, the circle of life continues 1 3
Armani? Posted November 9 Posted November 9 Like I'm sure Trump will pardon some rappers when he's elected like he did before I see Lil Durk is facing a life sentence The pandering is obvious, but maybe he'll actually do stop & frisk/ increasing police immunity somehow and it cancels out. 1 1 3
Armani? Posted November 9 Posted November 9 15 minutes ago, Wonderland said: White men will start to get pissed off when republicans start catering more of their ads and media to Latino and Black men. And thus, the circle of life continues I think they can deal with Latinos and White Latinos in their "movement" but trying to incorporate Black men in a White Supremacist movement is extremely hard to do, which is why they can only make minimum gains every election 3 2
Recommended Posts