Lil Mistee Posted October 5 Posted October 5 Idk anyone who watches late night like Kimmel who is the viewers of these shows ?
Lightbringer007 Posted October 5 Posted October 5 2 hours ago, Armani? said: my god clintons favorables ... this shouldve been a sign for whats to come-
Blade Posted October 5 Posted October 5 1 minute ago, Lightbringer007 said: my god clintons favorables ... this shouldve been a sign for whats to come- That + the primaries showing a mess 1
shelven Posted October 5 Posted October 5 12 minutes ago, Lightbringer007 said: my god clintons favorables ... this shouldve been a sign for whats to come- 10 minutes ago, Blade said: That + the primaries showing a mess A lot of people retroactively have a hard time remembering just how deeply unseriously the idea that Trump could actually win a general election was taken by Dems in 2016. I think a lot of people knew that Hillary was unlikeable and a bad nominee in any other election, but everyone was so solidly convinced that someone like Trump could never possibly win that nobody really cared about Hillary's flaws. In hindsight, everyone now knows that Trump successfully tapped into people's growing frustration with "political correctness" and desire for someone to "say the things everyone else is too afraid to say" or whatever, but at the time, there was truly no precedent for someone as unhinged and crass as Trump being capable of winning. 3
Lil Mistee Posted October 5 Posted October 5 2 minutes ago, dabunique said: Another hurricane on its way to Florida 😞 Trust me, us floridians dont care 1
GhostBox Posted October 5 Posted October 5 (edited) 19 minutes ago, Lightbringer007 said: This is good 👏🏼 but nothing on her schedule tomorrow is not good 💀 I have complained she should campaign more but these articles comparing her to Clinton are over exaggerating it 💀 like Clinton was convinced she was gonna win and barely visited the 3 big states. Edited October 5 by GhostBox 1
Blade Posted October 5 Posted October 5 34 minutes ago, shelven said: A lot of people retroactively have a hard time remembering just how deeply unseriously the idea that Trump could actually win a general election was taken by Dems in 2016. I think a lot of people knew that Hillary was unlikeable and a bad nominee in any other election, but everyone was so solidly convinced that someone like Trump could never possibly win that nobody really cared about Hillary's flaws. In hindsight, everyone now knows that Trump successfully tapped into people's growing frustration with "political correctness" and desire for someone to "say the things everyone else is too afraid to say" or whatever, but at the time, there was truly no precedent for someone as unhinged and crass as Trump being capable of winning. Yup. I remember it clearly. Those of us who were into politics at the time just remember how shocking it was and people forget that. People also forget, that with how much Hillary was hated clearly shown on her terrible favorability numbers, she still came within 77,000 votes of the presidency. I wonder how the narrative would have changed if Hillary did just *BARELY* win. Would people have viewed it as "of course Hillary won, everyone expected that" or "Trump was so close to being president". Back to my point above, people don't view the 2016 election as "close" despite it being extremely close. 4
GhostBox Posted October 5 Posted October 5 3 minutes ago, Blade said: Yup. I remember it clearly. Those of us who were into politics at the time just remember how shocking it was and people forget that. People also forget, that with how much Hillary was hated clearly shown on her terrible favorability numbers, she still came within 77,000 votes of the presidency. I wonder how the narrative would have changed if Hillary did just *BARELY* win. Would people have viewed it as "of course Hillary won, everyone expected that" or "Trump was so close to being president". Back to my point above, people don't view the 2016 election as "close" despite it being extremely close. Yup she barely lost even with running a horrible campaign
GhostBox Posted October 5 Posted October 5 The fact trumps back in Butler PA talking about getting shot (for the millionth time) and bringing Elon musk with him to make himself feel better about his rallies and assassination attempts being old news 💀😂
Sannie Posted October 5 Posted October 5 3 hours ago, Blade said: Their focus on very specific pockets of the electorate is important and should not be overlooked just because they're ignoring the national electorate. I do really like their strategy with this. I think there are a lot of people in this country who feel like they're not being paid attention to because they don't live in big cities or areas that are typically campaigned in, so giving them a little bit of attention will go a long way. States are winter takes off so if you can pull in a few thousand votes from areas that may typically not vote for you, that will add up. 1 hour ago, GhostBox said: 1 hour ago, dabunique said: Another hurricane on its way to Florida 😞 Democrats yet again using their big old weather machine to hurt the Republicans. 4
Sannie Posted October 5 Posted October 5 16 minutes ago, GhostBox said: Wow 👏🏼 People have been criticizing the campaign for not letting Tim shine, but I think it's been deliberate this entire time. They're now releasing him to the media right before the election so everything will be fresh in people's minds. 2
ClashAndBurn Posted October 5 Posted October 5 1 hour ago, Blade said: I can't take people seriously when valid critique of the Biden admin's foreign policy turns into things like "Holocaust Harris" or now "[Harris] is a genocidal zionist rape queen" And when her policy approach to Israel ultimately amounts to zero material difference between her approach and Biden's, will this still be the case? this is what working tirelessly for a ceasefire looks like 1 1
State of Grace. Posted October 5 Posted October 5 2 hours ago, Blade said: can't take people seriously when valid critique of the Biden admin's foreign policy turns into things like "Holocaust Harris" or now "[Harris] is a genocidal zionist rape queen" ....because that's wrong? She continuously entertains zionist propaganda and lies about "mass rape" happening on Oct 7th yet she has not said a single word about the documented rape and sexual assault happening in Israeli torture camps that everyone from women to children to men are subjected to. Kamala has made it clear that her stance and policy won't be that different from Biden's. You guys are truly only lying to yourselves. 2 2 5
Blade Posted October 5 Posted October 5 1 minute ago, State of Grace. said: ....because that's wrong? Yes 3
Blade Posted October 5 Posted October 5 8 minutes ago, ClashAndBurn said: And when her policy approach to Israel ultimately amounts to zero material difference between her approach and Biden's, will this still be the case? this is what working tirelessly for a ceasefire looks like Sorry, you're right. This is clear evidence that Kamala is in fact a Zionist Rape Queen.
State of Grace. Posted October 5 Posted October 5 Just now, Blade said: Kamala is in fact a Zionist Rape Queen. 2 3
Sannie Posted October 5 Posted October 5 If Kamala is a "rape queen," then by the very same stretched logic, the leftists in this thread are racist, xenophobic, transphobic misogynists since their ideals and actions will lead to a trump administration. If yall wanna admit to that, then I'll admit to your idea of what Kamala is. but you guys don't ever apply your own shaky logic to yourselves. 5 2
ClashAndBurn Posted October 5 Posted October 5 1 minute ago, Blade said: Sorry, you're right. This is clear evidence that Kamala is in fact a Zionist Rape Queen. I will agree with you to say it's not fair to describe her that way right now, since she's not President right this second. All I'm asking is, does that change when she does become President and carries out the exact same policy agenda that Joe Biden is right now? The way she's campaigning, leaning on the "Israel has a right to defend itself" platitudes certainly leads one to believe that yes, there will in fact be zero difference. 1
Recommended Posts