on the line Posted October 2 Posted October 2 1 hour ago, Vermillion said: What's the point of this one? Your obessession with the hurricane and posting negative, bad faith info on Biden/Harris is fascinating.
Redstreak Posted October 2 Posted October 2 12 minutes ago, on the line said: What's the point of this one? Your obessession with the hurricane and posting negative, bad faith info on Biden/Harris is fascinating. The tweet says "I hate this"? 1
Vermillion Posted October 2 Posted October 2 15 minutes ago, on the line said: What's the point of this one? Your obessession with the hurricane and posting negative, bad faith info on Biden/Harris is fascinating. Obsession? Hundreds missing and likely death roll to pass 200 at latest count? Is an obsession? Asheville, NC being likely never able to recover is an obsession? The Atlantic editor who I've had a lot of problems with is properly addressing the racist and bad faith talking point that is rightfully framed as populist nationalism given what's already been discussed as coming from different funding sources - there's an inherent problem for swaying say, independents to distinguish between the two but that's a separate conversation. You keep attributing the opinion of the original post to my viewpoint instead of the person actually retweeting it. You've done it three times now and I find that more fascinating. I'm not sure if it's in bad faith or you're just actively ignoring that context. Do you have an argument to present or you're just interested in debating everything I post in bad faith yourself? 3
Vermillion Posted October 2 Posted October 2 3 minutes ago, Redstreak said: The tweet says "I hate this"? I'm trying to understand what's not clicking. I'd be much more interested in unpacking how Dems will attempt to transcend voting blocks that don't want to distinguish between different funding sources for overseas allies and domestic natural disasters but I can't start if people keep engaging from this starting point.
on the line Posted October 2 Posted October 2 5 minutes ago, Redstreak said: The tweet says "I hate this"? Thank you for reaffirming what I read. My point is.... What's the point? Is it adding to the conversation? It's not even a viral tweet or by anyone or any account worth following. Just curious what the angle and reasoning behind posting that in this thread? 1
on the line Posted October 2 Posted October 2 2 minutes ago, on the line said: Thank you for reaffirming what I read. My point is.... What's the point? Is it adding to the conversation? It's not even a viral tweet or by anyone or any account worth following. Just curious what the angle and reasoning behind posting that in this thread? ^ @Vermin 1
Vermillion Posted October 2 Posted October 2 4 minutes ago, on the line said: Thank you for reaffirming what I read. My point is.... What's the point? Is it adding to the conversation? It's not even a viral tweet or by anyone or any account worth following. Just curious what the angle and reasoning behind posting that in this thread? If you want to tone police this thread please take it up with the mods in HQ. Not sure you'll get much consensus here seeing as you've already been banned several times. Kassi who had legions of fans here was mass reported and perma-banned for implying the Palestinians had it coming so I'm not sure what you're attempting to do here but it's not working. *Also reported your last for flamebait. You're on a roll.
on the line Posted October 2 Posted October 2 2 minutes ago, Vermillion said: If you want to tone police this thread please take it up with the mods in HQ. Not sure you'll get much consensus here seeing as you've already been banned several times. Kassi who had legions of fans here was mass reported and perma-banned for implying the Palestinians had it coming so I'm not sure what you're attempting to do here but it's not working. *Also reported your last for flamebait. You're on a roll. I could report ^ for being off topic too. So whoop dee doo! Tone? Lol. What goes on in your head? I didn't mention that at all! BUT - Why don't you just answer my question? I was genuinely asking you why someone with a teenage petulance name of "I hate flags" (for the record, I detest flags) is worthy of posting that random meme? 1
Vermillion Posted October 2 Posted October 2 Just now, on the line said: I could report ^ for being off topic too. So whoop dee doo! Tone? Lol. What goes on in your head? I didn't mention that at all! BUT - Why don't you just answer my question? I was genuinely asking you why someone with a teenage petulance name of "I hate flags" (for the record, I detest flags) is worthy of posting that random meme? Again, determining and creating a separate debate on the worthiness of a post is tone policing this thread. What's our criteria - the number of subscribers they have? I suppose that'd be a fascinating thing to unpack. That you expected everyone to ignore that you proudly don't care about properly reading retweets is not my problem. If you don't like what I have to post you're welcome to put me on ignore. 1
on the line Posted October 2 Posted October 2 1 minute ago, Vermillion said: Again, determining and creating a separate debate on the worthiness of a post is tone policing this thread. What's our criteria - the number of subscribers they have? I suppose that'd be a fascinating thing to unpack. That you expected everyone to ignore that you proudly don't care about properly reading retweets is not my problem. If you don't like what I have to post you're welcome to put me on ignore. I thought the point of this thread was to share information and educate users on the election since it's a very consequential one. MY BAD. this forum does have a viral tweet rule so it's not out of line for me to question it. you don't need to get so personally offended. 2
Vermillion Posted October 2 Posted October 2 1 minute ago, on the line said: this forum does have a viral tweet rule so it's not out of line for me to question it. you don't need to get so personally offended. that literally applies to only thread titles, how you're trying to apply that concept here is beyond me.
on the line Posted October 2 Posted October 2 4 minutes ago, Vermillion said: To be fair, I have lived in the hills, and inversions ARE real (and ******* weird), but they can very much happen during the day in the right weather conditions. 1
Marianah Adkins Posted October 2 Posted October 2 42 minutes ago, on the line said: What's the point of this one? Your obessession with the hurricane and posting negative, bad faith info on Biden/Harris is fascinating. I'm sorry but you are being an a-hole rn. The retweet is actually in favor of Biden and Harris People are allowed to post in this election thread, good and bad. 3 1
on the line Posted October 2 Posted October 2 2 minutes ago, Marianah Adkins said: I'm sorry but you are being an a-hole rn. The retweet is actually in favor of Biden and Harris People are allowed to post in this election thread, good and bad. It just felt like "i found this slightly interesting, random meme on my cousin's twitter." That user posts a lot of good info, so I was literally asking why it was posted and what I was missing as to why it was relevant. I already explained myself 5 times bc the user, again, wouldn't answer the question lol 2
Vermillion Posted October 2 Posted October 2 Tech fascism and Vance's idols getting renewed scrutiny in the last couple weeks from these earlier pieces…. 2
ATRL Moderator Bloo Posted October 2 ATRL Moderator Posted October 2 5 hours ago, Distantconstellation said: The one clip that is blowing up though is jd vance not being able to say that trump lost the election. It overshadows everything else. Trump, the one at the top of the Republican ticket, is unable to say he lost the election for years and the race is a complete toss up. That’s not going to move the needle at all. 2 1
Recommended Posts