Armani? Posted September 28 Posted September 28 Finally, since Trump came here I was tired of looking at the signs propped up 1
shelven Posted September 28 Posted September 28 So accordingly to NYT's polls, Pennsylvania is the bluest of the three Rust Belt swing states and Arizona and Ohio are equally red I'm honestly kinda over trying to figure out what their polls are saying. Clearly at least some of them will end up being wrong (at least we know they're not herding!) but we have no way of knowing which ones are right and which ones are wrong, so it's getting hard to do anything with them. Most useful thing to come out of their latest polls is further confirming that NE-02 is in the likely Harris column. 3
nadiamendell Posted September 28 Posted September 28 Yeah, this has definitely been a ... choice. 3 1
Marianah Adkins Posted September 28 Posted September 28 Hillary Hens are something else After almost a decade since her stunning loss, they still blame everyone but the candidate herself lmao. The revisionism they have been doing in X has pissed me off mostly because it shows that they never learned from her loss. 3 2
Communion Posted September 28 Posted September 28 On 9/26/2024 at 11:09 PM, Blade said: Finding out Nate Silver is a hunty Now wait a minute... Not the additional context of why this is recently a topic on political twitter making it even... funnier?? 2
Tovitov Posted September 28 Posted September 28 Nate Silver and Steve Kornaki are both huntys. Alot of election nerds are apparently
shelven Posted September 28 Posted September 28 13 minutes ago, Tovitov said: Alot of election nerds are apparently I mean we're on page 2000 of an election thread on one of the gayest websites on the Internet, this shouldn't be surprising. 6
Communion Posted September 28 Posted September 28 3 minutes ago, nooniebao said: Oh look, another conservative Democratic senator who doesn't support policies most Democratic voters want despite being in a deep state blue. I don't know what's worse. A geriatric Rhode Island senator being so "moderate" and reactionary or that the current and much younger senator from California votes even more conservatively than he does.
nooniebao Posted September 28 Posted September 28 6 minutes ago, Communion said: Oh look, another conservative Democratic senator who doesn't support policies most Democratic voters want despite being in a deep state blue. I don't know what's worse. A geriatric Rhode Island senator being so "moderate" and reactionary or that the current and much younger senator from California votes even more conservatively than he does. The fact that she's being replaced by Schiff 💀💀💀 Insane that a state so progressive never gets to have progressive Senators. 1
GhostBox Posted September 28 Posted September 28 https://x.com/kamalahq/status/1840075663874646129?s=46&t=royz6Xk8Y2goDXUVqAWj1g
Lil Mistee Posted September 28 Posted September 28 Okay yall imma need you guys to stop talking when we hit page 2024 until the election 5
ClashAndBurn Posted September 28 Posted September 28 23 minutes ago, nooniebao said: Genuinely it doesn't matter that they're claiming to support filibuster reform now, since the Senate is cooked for the rest of the decade. Thats why they can comfortably say these things. So they can go "well we would be willing to do all these progressive things for you, but you all didn't even vote hard enough to give us 50 senators!" And there's always going to be a rotating villain. Now that Manchin is stepping aside and Sinema has been shown the door, it's someone else's turn. If it wasn't Jack Reed, it would have been Bob Casey, Jeanne Shaheen, Maggie Hassan, or Elissa Slotkin. 1
GhostBox Posted September 28 Posted September 28 So she has a fundraiser today, a rally tomorrow, then the next scheduled event is Wednesday and then Friday. I'm gonna need them to step up their campaigning. It's been slacking a little lately. 3
Ashley Banks Posted September 28 Posted September 28 Dems are losing the Senate this year so the filibuster talk doesn't even matter Hopefully Thom Tillis and Susan Collins retire in 2026. Can you imagine how screwed we'd be if Republicans put up decent candidates in places like Arizona, Georgia, and Michigan? They'd probably have 60 Senate votes in a couple of cycles.
woohoo Posted September 28 Posted September 28 Can they carve out the filibuster only for certain issues like abortion rights and other things and leave it for the rest of legislation?
VOSS Posted September 28 Posted September 28 14 minutes ago, woohoo said: Can they carve out the filibuster only for certain issues like abortion rights and other things and leave it for the rest of legislation? They could. That was already done for judicial appointments and a couple of other things I believe. But doing it for something like abortion would definitely open the floodgates. I don't think Rs would use it to ban abortion when they took power in the senate but we could see right to work nationwide and **** like that 2
Recommended Posts