Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
7 hours ago, TheMusicProphet said:

Can a John Fetterman 2024 happen?

No. He’s too ugly 

  • Replies 81.9k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Vermillion

    13165

  • GhostBox

    5820

  • ClashAndBurn

    3572

  • Communion

    3146

Posted

Not "King Biden" :deadvision: stanning Trump teas

 

 

 

 

Posted
18 hours ago, Kassi said:

Speaking of Nancy’s birth chart, her transit patterns going into 2023 are quite telling. 
 

With Saturn moving into Aquarius around Q1 of 2022, we saw how work intensive this year was for Nancy with Roe overturned, inflation, soaring gas prices, and Taiwan. But Jupiter entering Pisces at the top of the year, trining her moon and sextiling her Taurus placements, offered a counterbalance to Saturn’s contraction and rigidity.
 

Then, around May, Jupiter entered Aries, Nancy’s sun sign, and will continue its transit into Taurus (her strongest placement) through the rest of 2022. This clues us in to the fact that post Nov 2022, she should be riding high in abundance. :chick2:

 

 

 

I didn’t wanna be THAT astrology gay in here, but erhm, yeah, this combined with the way the polls are unexpectedly shifting… I’m quite optimistic, but cautious, in saying that Dems keep the House. 
 

 

What's her rising sign?

Posted

 

Posted

 

Posted

 

Posted

 

Posted

 

Posted

Cross Roe thread /////

 

 

Posted

 

Posted

 

Posted

Cross Roe thread ////

 

 

Posted

 

Posted
5 hours ago, Kassi said:

No. He’s too ugly 

Not when Trump was easily one of the ugliest motherfuckers alive in politics :ahh: 

 

Fetterman is a CHAD and you will deal with the fact that he’s more electable in every way than either of Biden’s chosen successors (Pete/Kamala) are :ahh: 

Posted

I suppose when the backbench situation is this dire we have to go to these hypotheticals, but can Fetterman win PA first? 

 

Let alone have a term or two please? And before anyone makes DeSantis comparisons on not having enough time in office, the parties candidates are held to different standards in that department, imho. Obama for several reasons including a recession pre-(most) social media is an exception to that rule and doesn't count. 

Posted

 

Posted

 

Posted
4 hours ago, lawmak said:

What's her rising sign?

Leo, I fear. A natural born leader :gaycat6:

 

She was born on 3-26-1940 @ 3:10 pm (in Baltimore, MD)

Posted

 

Posted
23 minutes ago, Espresso said:

I suppose when the backbench situation is this dire we have to go to these hypotheticals, but can Fetterman win PA first? 

 

Let alone have a term or two please? And before anyone makes DeSantis comparisons on not having enough time in office, the parties candidates are held to different standards in that department, imho. Obama for several reasons including a recession pre-(most) social media is an exception to that rule and doesn't count. 

Sorry, but even if Fetterman somehow loses (as a result of Biden being so unpopular that no Democrat could have possibly won in any purple state), he’d be more electable than either of those two Walking Mondales.

Posted (edited)

Not a Biden stan calling someone other than Biden ugly :rip: the irony

 

mB7igJD.jpg

 

 

8PAHbvJ.jpg

 

And Biden's ugliness aside, imagine supporting someone for president based on their looks over their policy :rip: :rip: only a cultist would do that. The KHive cult of personality teas

 

 

And I also ratioed that neolib trash :cm:

 

 

Edited by rihannabiggestfan
Posted
3 hours ago, ClashAndBurn said:

Sorry, but even if Fetterman somehow loses (as a result of Biden being so unpopular that no Democrat could have possibly won in any purple state), he’d be more electable than either of those two Walking Mondales.

I'm not implying he isn't, but my point still stands on the ideal situation being more time in office prior. 

 

But obviously we're not in the ideal situation on multiple fronts in politics now and won't ever be again I think. 

Posted

 

Posted
1 minute ago, Espresso said:

I'm not implying he isn't, but my point still stands on the ideal situation being more time in office prior. 

 

But obviously we're not in the ideal situation on multiple fronts in politics now and won't ever be again I think. 

Indeed. I don't believe Fetterman 2024 is really on the table anyway. Earliest he could possibly run is 2032, since we can all pretty much assume at this point that Kamala's going to have the path cleared for her and any "primary" that takes place is simply going to be a useless clown show.

 

Bold predictions:

 

2024: Joe runs, probably loses to Trump because people have misplaced anger and resentment over inflation/recession, and the Ukraine war will probably still be grinding on like it has since 2014.

 

2028: Kamala's the nominee, loses to DeSantis in a massive landslide.

 

2032: DeSantis is the incumbent and will probably be super popular to normies/independents since he'll have Trump's policies without the idiocy.

Posted

 

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.