GhostBox Posted August 27 Posted August 27 It's hilarious watching Trump bring out people who already supported him as some breaking news that they are now "officially" endorsing him (Tulsi, ect)💀 nothing reeks of desperation to manufacture good headlines than that
shelven Posted August 27 Posted August 27 18 minutes ago, GhostBox said: It's hilarious watching Trump bring out people who already supported him as some breaking news that they are now "officially" endorsing him (Tulsi, ect)💀 nothing reeks of desperation to manufacture good headlines than that To be fair, this is kind of similar to what that "Kamala's Wins" Twitter account does whenever it tweets "Kamala just got endorsed by [insert very liberal A-list Hollywood celebrity who's been aggressively anti-Trump for 9 years]. This is a HUGE WIN!" Thankfully her official team is smart enough not to actually engage with that corny account. 1
Wonderland Posted August 27 Posted August 27 58 minutes ago, GhostBox said: It's hilarious watching Trump bring out people who already supported him as some breaking news that they are now "officially" endorsing him (Tulsi, ect)💀 nothing reeks of desperation to manufacture good headlines than that I don't disagree; but isn't that just what happened all week at the DNC? 4
VOSS Posted August 27 Posted August 27 Kari Lake has been such a massive gift to the dems. I hope she runs again in 2026 5 1
Wonderland Posted August 27 Posted August 27 Why did I just listen to Brave and Fight Song Hillary, ha IMPACT 6
Musicmajor Posted August 27 Posted August 27 7 hours ago, Wonderland said: I don't disagree; but isn't that just what happened all week at the DNC? The DNC had the usual suspects endorse and make the case for Kamala BUT, they also had a lot of republicans come on the stage and endorse Kamala, too. I think that is more effective to have actual republicans on the other side, saying they're for Kamala. As opposed to RFK and Tulsi, they're not swaying any independents over. I saw a poll that said 50% say RFK's endorsement made no difference, 25% said they're more likely to vote for Trump and 25% said they're less likely. Essentially a total wash and zero net gain for Trump.
WildAmerican Posted August 27 Posted August 27 ohhhh Florida The thing is, if she's winning FL she's likely already won the election so it's really not worth putting a lot of money there. It won't get her over 270, it would get to like 330 or 340 lol 1
dabunique Posted August 27 Posted August 27 11 minutes ago, WildAmerican said: ohhhh Florida The thing is, if she's winning FL she's likely already won the election so it's really not worth putting a lot of money there. It won't get her over 270, it would get to like 330 or 340 lol if she were to flip Florida it would be so over for Trump and it would be an early night for us lol 5
Wonderland Posted August 27 Posted August 27 It's interesting to see Rick Scott polling that much worse than Trump in Florida. It was such a close race in 2018 when he beat Bill Nelson
dabunique Posted August 27 Posted August 27 2 minutes ago, Wonderland said: It's interesting to see Rick Scott polling that much worse than Trump in Florida. It was such a close race in 2018 when he beat Bill Nelson Bill Nelson was trash so dat upset was brewing we will see what happens so many people hate Rick Scott here but still vote for him .. make it make sense lol
Wonderland Posted August 27 Posted August 27 (edited) 12 minutes ago, dabunique said: Bill Nelson was trash so dat upset was brewing we will see what happens so many people hate Rick Scott here but still vote for him .. make it make sense lol He was definitely giving off Biden age vibes even in 2018 10,000 votes and the senate could have been so different these last 6 years. Not only in terms of Democratic votes, but Rick Scott wouldn't be lined up as Mitch's likely successor. Edited August 27 by Wonderland 1
Armani? Posted August 27 Posted August 27 I almost misread this as being for Florida and rolled my eyee 1
Sannie Posted August 27 Posted August 27 11 hours ago, shelven said: To be fair, this is kind of similar to what that "Kamala's Wins" Twitter account does whenever it tweets "Kamala just got endorsed by [insert very liberal A-list Hollywood celebrity who's been aggressively anti-Trump for 9 years]. This is a HUGE WIN!" Thankfully her official team is smart enough not to actually engage with that corny account. 11 hours ago, Wonderland said: I don't disagree; but isn't that just what happened all week at the DNC? No, it's not what happened. The people Trump is pulling in, including his own VP, are all people who have been railing against him since 2016 and only changed their tune once they realized they could gain some power by doing so. The people Kamala is pulling in, are not people who have public statements calling her a fraud, a racist, "Hitler", etc. 4
Communion Posted August 27 Posted August 27 3 hours ago, Musicmajor said: I think that is more effective to have actual republicans on the other side, saying they're for Kamala. Maybe the Democrats shouldn't pander and try to woo over people belonging to a fascist political party.
Musicmajor Posted August 27 Posted August 27 22 minutes ago, Communion said: Maybe the Democrats shouldn't pander and try to woo over people belonging to a fascist political party. To be fair, they're courting the old school McCain/Romney types of republicans that are looking for a return to form for their party, not Trump's fascist extremist party.
Sannie Posted August 27 Posted August 27 Yet another poll showing Kamala inching closer to 50% and Trump failing to get past his ceiling. 4
Relampago. Posted August 27 Posted August 27 One of the most disgusting things I've seen said about Kamala.. on national TV anyways. These people have no shame. 2
FameFatale Posted August 27 Posted August 27 (edited) 39 minutes ago, VOSS said: Says the man who wandered around the DNC in a disguise Edited August 27 by FameFatale 2
Recommended Posts