Jump to content

Recommended Posts

  • ATRL Moderator
Posted
1 minute ago, NausAllien said:

They're actually having a blast because they think this is the mistake that will cost Kamala the election!

 

Tell me you don't interact with Conservatives and MAGA without telling me you don't interact with them... :ace:

They think calling him progressive will alienate moderates when really it just gives him a chance to defend his record and explain why providing free tuition and reducing child poverty are good policies :clap3:

  • Like 7
  • Thanks 2

  • Replies 79.6k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Vermillion

    12278

  • GhostBox

    5763

  • ClashAndBurn

    3339

  • Communion

    3047

Posted
1 minute ago, NausAllien said:

Wow... you are completely delusional. Maybe talking to people outside of this echo chamber will do you good!

 

YOU ARE NOT AMERICAN. Dont tell Americans who interact and know republicans in real life anything about their "echo chambers" 

 

And this is a massive apology to any non American on here who enjoys talking American politics (seriously I love all of you). My issues specifically are with this user 

  • Like 7
  • Thanks 6
Posted

Oh! A rural veteran with little actual appetite to see the cycle of war continue and perpetuate!

 

 

 

 

 

  • Like 4
Posted
Just now, NausAllien said:

They're actually having a blast because they think this is the mistake that will cost Kamala the election!

 

Tell me you don't interact with Conservatives and MAGA without telling me you don't interact with them... :ace:

I live in one of the reddest states in the US, and thus I have to interact with them on a daily basis. You're yapping on about interacting with the other side when you don't even live here :rip: 

 

These same conservatives thought that the greater US public wouldn't care about abortion (wrong), would broadly support Project 2025 (wrong), and JD Vance was a good vp pick (wrong again). I have yet to see any evidence that their or your political opinions are in tune with the average American's :sistrens:

  • Like 7
  • Thanks 2
Posted
3 minutes ago, NausAllien said:

Wow... you are completely delusional. Maybe talking to people outside of this echo chamber will do you good!

 

If I whispered in your ear I'm sure I could hear it echo in your skull 

  • Haha 12
Posted
2 minutes ago, NausAllien said:

Wow... you are completely delusional. Maybe talking to people outside of this echo chamber will do you good!

 

dddd sister I live in a county that went for Trump by 15 points and about 75% of the people I work with are ardent Republicans, who I've been having conversations with about Tim Walz all morning. I can (and have) literally just call up my Trump voting parents and ask them what they think about Tim Walz that's not ending up on Twitter  :deadbanana4:

 

I know it's hard for you to get an accurate read of American politics from 5000 miles away but please don't make assumptions about my echo chamber :deadbanana4:

  • Like 8
Posted
7 minutes ago, Bears01 said:

"For what it's worth republicans ecstatic about the pick". They were going to be "ecstatic" no matter who she picked, dawg. They were going to taint anyone she picked as a "radical left socialist" and were already blatantly prepared to divide the left if they chose Shapiro. 
 

What do you not get about republicans and how they operate by now? Oh, you're a non American cos playing as a conservative troll, that's what you don't get 

dddd right? Like, are we supposed to be surprised the right-wing echo chamber is excited and thinks a man who gave kids free school meals is going to lose the election for Kamala? Just more proof of how out-of-touch they are.

 

7 minutes ago, NausAllien said:

They're actually having a blast because they think this is the mistake that will cost Kamala the election!

 

Tell me you don't interact with Conservatives and MAGA without telling me you don't interact with them... :ace:

Yeah, no, we don't interact with people who believe in eugenics, race science, and think trans people should be eradicated from the planet. It says a lot about you that you do. :rip:

 

Posted

I can't wait to get my Harris/Walz flag and make da Cubans seethe in my neighborhood 

 

i'm also gettin a Cubans for Kamala shirt lol

  • Like 4
Posted

:ahh:

 

 

 

  • Haha 6
Posted
10 minutes ago, NausAllien said:

They're actually having a blast because they think this is the mistake that will cost Kamala the election!

 

Tell me you don't interact with Conservatives and MAGA without telling me you don't interact with them... :ace:

and where do you live, Miss Naus??

  • Thanks 1
  • Haha 5
Posted
6 minutes ago, Newt said:

I see folks highlighting aspects of Walz' record, and he appears to be progressive in his political ambitions. At the same time, I see folks indicating that prior to this point, they saw him as a moderate, not a progressive. 

 

What is driving this disconnect? Is this an example of progressives on the left playing purity politics and not claiming him because of a few specific incidents that don't necessarily represent his overall political inclinations (i.e. the article I just saw about building pipes on indigenous land). 

 

OR are people just excited and selectively highlighting the progressive aspects of his politics, when in actuality he's demonstrated that he's far more moderate than what people are currently presenting him as?

Being progressive in the US means not supporting genocide and making sure children can be fed at school

 

This is like… the bare minimum in many industrialized countries. He would be moderate in more progressive countries but he's the second coming of Che Guevara in the US.

  • Like 2
Posted
2 minutes ago, Aston Martin said:

I live in one of the reddest states in the US, and thus I have to interact with them on a daily basis. You're yapping on about interacting with the other side when you don't even live here :rip: 

 

These same conservatives thought that the greater US public wouldn't care about abortion (wrong), would broadly support Project 2025 (wrong), and JD Vance was a good vp pick (wrong again). I have yet to see any evidence that their or your political opinions are in tune with the average American's :sistrens:

This. The median American may be generally politically independent/centered but with the increasing diversification of American demographics, American is inevitably going to shift left even if to a small extent. This is why people have gotten things like the impact of Roe wrong.

 

Most Americans want to mind their own business. They're simply not as hungry for things like culture wars, restricting rights, Project 2025, or other punitive bullsh*t. I just know they're completely over politics being an unhinged zoo and because of that fact, Trump has a HUGE uphill battle.

  • Like 3
Posted

The Trump campaign has Trump doing live streams with an out-of-touch, racist streamers who appeal to the dredges of American society while Kamala just chose a working-class educator, veteran, and genuinely kind man to be her running mate. The two parties couldn't be any more different.

  • Like 5
  • Thanks 3
Posted

 

  • Like 8
Posted

 

Posted
2 hours ago, Vroom Vroom said:

@ClashAndBurn get ready to vote for Kamala!! #HelpMoveGeorgiaForward 

I'm an *** of my word. Was always planning to with any VP pick other than Shapiro :gaycat: 

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 3
  • Haha 2
Posted
2 minutes ago, Newt said:

I see folks highlighting aspects of Walz' record, and he appears to be progressive in his political ambitions. At the same time, I see folks indicating that prior to this point, they saw him as a moderate, not a progressive. 

 

What is driving this disconnect? Is this an example of progressives on the left playing purity politics and not claiming him because of a few specific incidents that don't necessarily represent his overall political inclinations (i.e. the article I just saw about building pipes on indigenous land). 

 

OR are people just excited and selectively highlighting the progressive aspects of his politics, when in actuality he's demonstrated that he's far more moderate than what people are currently presenting him as?

He was a center left Dem in his time in the House and basically decided to work with progressives instead of against them when the strongest opponent he had was a progressive in his original primary for governor and basically worked with the progressive legislature to pass a slew of policies that progressives in the state had been fighting for now that they finally had a (1-seat) majority. 

 

His weaknesses to progressives would be that he's a normie at the end of the day and not a revolutionary. So when he has tried to play his hand and gets out-played, he ends up towing to political pressures. See: Him using his veto for the first time to cancel a minimum wage bill for rideshare drivers after Uber actually called the state's bluff and said they'd be removing the service from the entire state if passed. Also him calling in the national guard during the 2020 George Floyd protests after political pressure mounted. 

 

He was the most progressive pick out of the options and Minnesota will now get a new governor who is more of an ideological progressive than Walz. 

  • Like 5
Posted

 

  • Like 1
Posted
10 minutes ago, Newt said:

I see folks highlighting aspects of Walz' record, and he appears to be progressive in his political ambitions. At the same time, I see folks indicating that prior to this point, they saw him as a moderate, not a progressive. 

 

What is driving this disconnect? Is this an example of progressives on the left playing purity politics and not claiming him because of a few specific incidents that don't necessarily represent his overall political inclinations (i.e. the article I just saw about building pipes on indigenous land). 

 

OR are people just excited and selectively highlighting the progressive aspects of his politics, when in actuality he's demonstrated that he's far more moderate than what people are currently presenting him as?

The latter plus people see something written in print and take it as the gods honest truth.

 

He is very much a moderate who supports common sense policy, many which are values for progressives too. My MN friends are very confused by this progressive label. 

Posted

People just live streaming and staked out at The Walz home is sending me :deadbanana2:

Posted

 

  • Like 5
Posted
22 minutes ago, NausAllien said:

She picked Walz. It seems she realized Shapiro was tainted goods.

 

This is a risky bet for progressives. They have a progressive candidate on the ticket, but if he loses, no mainstream politician will want to touch another progressive with a ten-foot pole. He'll be blamed for the defeat. If he wins, it will signal a change in the tide for mainstream politicians, and you'll see more progressive policies being pushed in Congress.

 

For what it's worth, Republicans and MAGA are ecstatic about this pick. There's even a video of Walz talking about being a socialist, and that video is spreading like wildfire. Socialism has always been the boogeyman of the Right, and this might turn independents off the ticket. Not to mention, never-Trump Republicans.

 

were you not here every single day saying shapiro was a done deal per the betting market and that he would be a campaign ender?

  • Haha 8
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.