justin. Posted August 3 Posted August 3 35 minutes ago, shelven said: "Each briefing is expected to last about 60 to 90 minutes, but some could be shorter or longer depending on what needs to be discussed" Oh they better have 3 hours set aside for Shapiro Nah. They only need 20 minutes to show her how horrible he is.
Redstreak Posted August 3 Posted August 3 https://x.com/writcertiorari/status/1819386395858768303 💀 I still think about this proposal every now and then 1
Eat The Acid Posted August 3 Posted August 3 When the vetting team promptly begin and end their 90 minute presentation on Shapiro with the following; 1 3
Communion Posted August 3 Posted August 3 10 hours ago, Harriser said: All this Shapiro talk is getting hyperbolic. Nothing has actually happened. Yet we have an increasingly overblown bandwagon, yapping to each other seeing who can get the next most outlandish doomer take about how Shapiro brings the whole operation down single handedly. I don't mind pressuring the campaign to not pick him, but if they do, it's gonna be really frustrating to see all the disproportionate breakdowns about it being 'over' VP Shapiro falls firmly into the 'not ideal' category, not the 'disaster' category. In the end it is Kamala's positions that actually matter and he will fall in line with them. The man is not really that meaningfully different to someone like Mark Kelly but yall have convinced each other he is satanspwan. And he somehow gets framed as worse every day. Keep yourselves together Ah, yes. Kamala Harris. Famously known for being a politician with clear and consistent views and positions on things like issues and policies. 2 1 1
Eat The Acid Posted August 3 Posted August 3 Kamala and Shapiro being confirmed at her rally on Monday evening 2
Bamboo Posted August 3 Posted August 3 There's so much pushback on Shapiro right now I know I live in a lot of left wing circles but when the controversies start hitting the front page of Reddit, I know they're starting to seep into the mainstream. It would be misguided to pick him at this point. 1 1
justin. Posted August 3 Posted August 3 God, I don't want Kamala to give in to his demands, but we desperately need a debate. I hate him so much.
WildAmerican Posted August 3 Posted August 3 1 hour ago, nadiamendell said: miss ilovetimwalz, @WalzWins was right there c'mon 2 2
Bears01 Posted August 3 Posted August 3 1 hour ago, Communion said: So basically the grade she'll get from the elected left depending on who she chooses: A = Tim Walz B = Andy Beshear C+ = JB Pritzker C- = Mark Kelly D = Pete Buttigieg F = Josh Shapiro I would tweak these a little bit. I'd give Shapiro a "D" just for the fact that he probably would help in PA but that's about it. I'd give Pete an F. He brings NOTHING. I'd give pritzker a B-, he's been relatively ok as governor of IL. Beshear an A. Mark Kelly is too anti union to fall below a D+ for me personally but I can see the arguments about him being a C 1
Armani? Posted August 3 Posted August 3 1 hour ago, nadiamendell said: Ew. It's only because of Pennsylvania but it alienates Unions, Progressives, Young Voters, Arab voters and possibly even women I doubt all that **** gets swept under the rug about him 4 2
Armani? Posted August 3 Posted August 3 1 hour ago, FameFatale said: Oh Trump is holding a rally today in Atlanta at the same arena Kamala did Tuesday People traveling from the suburbs and hours out in rural GA just to come to that I see
Armani? Posted August 3 Posted August 3 Just now, FameFatale said: This isn't the route to go Who said she was the savior of Black people
justin. Posted August 3 Posted August 3 5 minutes ago, FameFatale said: This isn't the route to go The crowd barely cheering gives me slight hope tbh
Lightbringer007 Posted August 3 Posted August 3 walz being endorsed by everyone ... truly the unifier that this election truly needs 9
ATRL Moderator Azulito Posted August 3 ATRL Moderator Posted August 3 Is there any reason why Walz is getting more support vs Beshear? Both would be great but I'm leaning towards Beshear tbh 1
Armani? Posted August 3 Posted August 3 2 minutes ago, Azulito said: Is there any reason why Walz is getting more support vs Beshear? Both would be great but I'm leaning towards Beshear tbh He has more clout in government already for being a Congressman prior I guess, plus he's given them great attack messaging I'm surprised though tbh, I would think Beshear would be easier to settle on
Communion Posted August 3 Posted August 3 11 minutes ago, Azulito said: Is there any reason why Walz is getting more support vs Beshear? Both would be great but I'm leaning towards Beshear tbh For progressives, probably just policy record. Walz is a liberal who had a progressive legislature that passed a bunch of legislation; Beshear is a liberal with a conservative legislature and whom only has on his resume - in terms of what progressives would like - vetos of bad legislation. I think progressives are just trying to push for what may appear as the most leftward option. I know one or two users who would say they aren't really ideologically driven themselves moved from Beshear to Walz based on their TV appearances. 1 1
Sannie Posted August 3 Posted August 3 Does anybody know enough about Eric Holder to tell me what we think he would want as a vice president?
Recommended Posts