Jump to content

2024 US Election Megathread ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ›๏ธ


Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)
49 minutes ago, Mariah4life said:

Are the Republicans calling Kamala, Karma-La? They are so terrible omg. Watching the clown and that's what he's calling herย 

I hope Kamala shades him back and calls him T-rump or Troompย :ahh:ย 

Edited by Wonderland

  • Replies 80k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Vermillion

    12471

  • GhostBox

    5773

  • ClashAndBurn

    3354

  • Communion

    3059

Posted

ย 

  • Haha 7
Posted

ย 

  • Like 2
Posted

ย 

Posted

ย 

  • Haha 1
Posted

ย 

Posted

@Communionย :grump:

ย 

ย 

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
47 minutes ago, GhostBox said:

Another close poll. And this is before she picks her vp, the dnc convention, and before any debates.ย 

ย 

I love seeing her take support from third party candidates.

ย 

The dynamics of this race changed so much. It is no longer a lesser of two evils election like 2016. Kamala is the future and Trump is the past. It is extremely clear. I have so much hope nowย 

  • Like 5
Posted

ย 

ย 

  • Like 3
  • Thanks 1
Posted

ย 

Average today: Trump +1.75

ย 

Maybe she'll get a bump after the Convention!

Posted
1 minute ago, NausAllien said:

ย 

Average today: Trump +1.75

ย 

Maybe she'll get a bump after the Convention!

Dude you're exhausting ๐Ÿ’€

ย 

her campaign is only 3 days old and it's already basically a tied race.ย 

Posted
2 hours ago, Sannie said:

I'm watching clips of Trump at his North Carolina rally trying to attack Kamala and it's so, so, so, so clear they have nothing on her.ย 

Don't worry, they will dig some dirt on her after Convention. I bet russian propaganda machine is working 24/7 on that matter, same like they did it with Hillary, so just wait and prepare your popcornย :fan:

Posted
6 minutes ago, GhostBox said:

Dude you're exhausting ๐Ÿ’€

ย 

her campaign is only 3 days old and it's already basically a tied race.ย 

At this time, Hillary was 2% up in 2016 and lost the EC. Biden was up 9% up and won by 4.5.ย 

ย 

The race is NOT tied. Trump is up by 2%, and Kamala SHOULD be up by at least 2-3% to win the EC.

ย 

These are FACTS. Sorry if they annoy you or burst this bubble you have created...

ย 

  • Thumbs Down 8
Posted
13 minutes ago, NausAllien said:

ย 

Average today: Trump +1.75

ย 

Maybe she'll get a bump after the Convention!

Are you so dim that you think a statistical tie is a good thing for Trump post RNC, assassination attempt, and with Kamala being three days out? :ahh:ย 

  • Like 8
  • Thanks 1
  • Thumbs Down 1
Posted
Just now, Sannie said:

Are you so dim that you think a statistical tie is a good thing for Trump post RNC, assassination attempt, and with Kamala being three days out? :ahh:ย 

I guess that when you run out of arguments, you have to resort to ad hominems.

ย 

I'm not dim; I'm REALISTIC. Unlike most of you.

ย 

Kamala is her honeymoon period getting A TON of good media coverage, has a ton of money to spend on ads and billboards, has endorsements from huge celebrities posting her on their huge social media accounts, has the entire world watching to see who she's gonna pick as running mate... And yet, the best she can get is an average of Trump + 1.75?

ย 

Biden in April was STRONGER than Kamala now:

5jJwYHX.jpeg

ย 

So congrats, Kamala is doing slightly better than a barely cognisant Biden post-debate...ย :michael:

ย 

  • Like 1
  • Thumbs Down 1
  • ATRL Moderator
Posted
7 minutes ago, NausAllien said:

At this time, Hillary was 2% up in 2016 and lost the EC. Biden was up 9% up and won by 4.5.ย 

Hillary also was the established presidential candidate. Kamala justย became the presumptive nominee after the top of the ticket dropping out of the race and her needing to swap places with him very quickly.ย 

ย 

I'm usually the most vocally defensive people in this thread when it comes to the polls. I think too many people undercut their relevance and fail to correctly remember their accuracy in several election years. But, we need to wait a while until the polls stabilize for Kamala. Sheย justย started campaigning whereas Hillary had been campaigning for a year at this point in 2016. The polls are changing rapidly right now and there's a lot of variability at the moment. We need to wait a bit for them to settle down before we can actually rely on them too much at this point.

ย 

I'm not saying ignore them completely. But, we need to look at all them with 10 pounds of salt because too many things are changing right now for us to rely on them too much at this point.

  • Like 12
  • ATRL Moderator
Posted
2 minutes ago, NausAllien said:

Kamala is her honeymoon period getting A TON of good media coverage

No, the honeymoon will likely be the convention.

ย 

I'm all happy to entertain criticisms of Kamala. But, hyper-fixating on polls forย thisย candidate with these historic circumstances makes no sense. We gotta wait a bit before we read too much into them because this circumstance is unprecedented.

  • Like 9
Posted
2 minutes ago, Bloo said:

I'm not saying ignore them completely. But, we need to look at all them with 10 pounds of salt because too many things are changing right now for us to rely on them too much at this point.

I'm not saying the polls RIGHT now are the end of the story. They are a snapshot. I get that. But I would have expected a bigger bump considering all the reasons I mentioned in my other comment (tons of good media coverage, articles everywhere, tons of money to spend on ads, celebrity endorsements, etc). This is supposed to be her honeymoon period but she's barely doing better than the disaster that was Biden post-debate and nowhere near close as Biden pre-debate.

ย 

I still think giving Kamala theย candidacy on a silver plater rather than having a selection of possible candidates and letting people decide was a bad idea. It might have been messy until the convention, but it would have resulted in Dems picking a far better candidate.

  • ATRL Moderator
Posted
3 minutes ago, NausAllien said:

I'm not saying the polls RIGHT now are the end of the story. They are a snapshot. I get that. But I would have expected a bigger bump considering all the reasons I mentioned in my other comment (tons of good media coverage, articles everywhere, tons of money to spend on ads, celebrity endorsements, etc). This is supposed to be her honeymoon period but she's barely doing better than the disaster that was Biden post-debate and nowhere near close as Biden pre-debate.

ย 

I still think giving Kamala theย candidacy on a silver plater rather than having a selection of possible candidates and letting people decide was a bad idea. It might have been messy until the convention, but it would have resulted in Dems picking a far better candidate.

Donald Trump just narrowly survived being assassinated just over a week ago. There's aย lotย going on and undecided voters still barely know Kamala. Sure, Kamala is the VP. But she's the VP of one of the most unpopular presidents in history. She needs to develop her own branding that is removed from Biden to gain traction. That does not happen over night. Give it time.

ย 

So, again, this is not the honeymoon phase. This is the phase to build up hype and momentum and lay the groundwork to win over undecided voters. That's happening now. The week following the convention will be a better vibe check to see how the GP is feeling about her. Now is too indecisive to know much of anything.

  • Like 14
Posted
1 minute ago, Rotunda said:

No shade but do you genuinely think you're the smartest person in this thread? You've been getting whacked for days by most users in this thread regardless of political ideology.ย 

I never claimed to be the smartest, and I most definitely am not. However, I believe I am more objective and realistic than many of you. You all are simply too close to be impartial. You see everything through a particular lens. But my lens isn't tainted by fanaticism toward any political party or ideology.

ย 

The fact that most of you are so overtly ANTAGONISTIC towards someone who has different ideas, opinions, and perspectives speaks really poorly of you.

ย 

@Bloo disagreed with my interpretation of the poll, but they weren't rude like most of you are.

  • Like 1
  • ATRL Moderator
Posted
4 minutes ago, NausAllien said:

I never claimed to be the smartest, and I most definitely am not. However, I believe I am more objective and realistic than many of you. You all are simply too close to be impartial. You see everything through a particular lens. But my lens isn't tainted by fanaticism toward any political party or ideology.

I criticize the Democrats all the time and dunk on them more than I do the GOP, as do a lot of people in this thread. I'm also not a Democrat or a Republican, so frankly, the presumption on your end is not well founded. Plenty of us can be objective about the politics in our country. Are some of us super partisan? Sure. But, I wouldn't project that onto all of us. It's a pretty weak assumption. Additionally, not being an American does not make you more objective; it generally makes you less wary to how things play out in American politics.

  • Thanks 4
Posted

ย 

Posted

Can we just agree that an average of the very minimal polls that have been conducted since Sunday shows a Trump lead within the MOE during his convention bump and a gain for Harris compared to Biden among young, minority, and independent voters?

ย 

That's literally ALL we know about the state of this new 4 day old race.

  • Like 4
  • Thanks 1
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.